Open Access

Arima hot spring waters as a deep-seated brine from subducting slab

  • Chiho Kusuda1,
  • Hikaru Iwamori2, 3Email author,
  • Hitomi Nakamura2, 3,
  • Kohei Kazahaya4 and
  • Noritoshi Morikawa4
Earth, Planets and Space201466:119

DOI: 10.1186/1880-5981-66-119

Received: 3 June 2014

Accepted: 19 August 2014

Published: 19 September 2014


Non-volcanic hot springs are generally believed to originate through circulation of meteoric or buried sea water heated at depth. In this study, we report the geochemical characteristics of the Arima and Takarazuka hot spring waters, known as Arima-type deep brine, in a forearc region of southwestern Japan. We examine 14 water samples to determine the levels of 12 solute elements or components and the isotopic ratios of H, He, C, O, and Sr, and we perform correlation analysis of the data to deduce the source materials and origin of the deep brine. Moreover, we perform numerical modeling of oxygen and hydrogen isotopic fractionation along subducting slabs to examine the composition of slab-derived fluid as a possible candidate of the deep brine. The results suggest that the high salinity and solute concentrations with characteristic oxygen, hydrogen, carbon, and strontium isotope compositions, as well as high 3He/4He ratios, can be explained by a dehydrated component of the subducted Philippine Sea slab. Hence, this study may provide an invaluable understanding of geofluid processes over a significant depth range.


Subduction Geofluid Slab-fluid Hot spring Arima


Various geophysical and geochemical studies suggest that within the mantle wedge and crust in subduction zones, fluid fluxes may trigger seismicity and magmatism throughout the system (e.g., Iwamori 2007; Hasegawa et al. 2008). The term 'fluid' in this case includes a variety of physical substances such as aqueous fluid, supercritical fluid, and melt (or magma), which are often referred to as 'geofluids.' Studies on geofluids may provide a clue to understanding the hydrological budget in subduction zones, as well as the global water and element cycling, since subduction zones are the major injection sites of water and chemical elements existing at the surface into the Earth's interior (Jarrard 2003; Fischer 2008; Iwamori and Albarède 2008; Shinohara 2013).

With its distinct geochemical signatures, the Arima-type brine is known as a possible candidate of deep-seated geofluid. Despite its presence in non-volcanic regions in the forearc domain, in which Quaternary volcanoes do not appear (Figure 1), the oxygen and hydrogen isotope compositions have affinities to magmatic/metamorphic fluids; thus, the presence of a deep brine distinct from near-surface water, including meteoric water and seawater, has been long argued for the origin of Arima hot springs (e.g., Matsubaya et al. 1973; Tanaka et al. 1984; Masuda et al. 1985 and the references therein; overview presented in Sakai and Matsuhisa 1996). Although a precise definition of Arima-type brine has not been presented, non-volcanic hot springs with high chlorine (approximately 40,000 ppm) and other solute contents, as well as the distinct oxygen and hydrogen isotopic ratios, occur in the Osaka to Kii areas, southwestern Japan, along large fault zones (Matsubaya 1981; Nishimura 2000), where high 3He/4He of gases occur associated with spring waters (Nagao et al. 1981; Sano and Wakita 1985; Okada et al. 1994; Matsumoto et al. 2003; Umeda et al. 2006; Morikawa et al. 2008).
Figure 1

Locality and tectonic setting of the Arima hot springs (small red circle), modified from Hirose et al. (2008). The pink area involving Arima shows the arbitrary boundary of the ‘Kinki Spot,’ where anomalously high 3He/4He ratios have been observed (Sano and Wakita 1985; Sano et al. 2009). Contour lines indicate the upper surface of the subducted Philippine Sea Plate, and the triangles denote Quaternary volcanoes.

On the contrary, the nature and composition of such deep geofluids have been studied through high-pressure experiments on element partitioning (e.g., Brenan et al. 1995; Keppler 1996; Kogiso et al. 1997; Kessel et al. 2005), geochemical constraints on subducting materials and arc magmas (e.g., Ishikawa and Nakamura 1992; Plank and Langmuir 1998; Pearce et al. 2005; Nakamura et al. 2008; Kimura et al. 2009), and fluid inclusions in mantle-derived xenoliths (e.g., Schiano et al. 1995; Ishimaru and Arai 2008; Ionov 2010; Kawamoto et al. 2013), constraining elemental abundances and isotopic ratios of these geofluids.

In this study, we discuss the relationship between Arima-type brine and deep geofluids in a definitive manner. In particular, we examine multiple element and isotopes of the hot spring waters, including the oxygen and hydrogen isotopic composition of the slab-derived fluid, and we determine whether the characteristic O-H isotopic compositions of the Arima-type brine are explained by the slab fluid.

Multiple elemental and isotopic characterization

Sample and analytical methods

The samples and localities are listed in Table 1. In December 2007, water and gas samples were collected from hot mineral springs and artesian wells at 14 sites in the Arima area, located on the northern slope of the Rokko Mountains where basement rocks are composed mainly of Paleozoic to Mesozoic sedimentary rocks; upper Cretaceous to Paleogene volcanic rocks, including mostly rhyolites and andesites; and Cretaceous to Paleogene granitic rocks (Arai 2007). The Arima-Takatsuki Tectonic Line and the associated faults are distributed in the studied area, along which the Arima hot spring waters flow from the surface (Kozuki 1962).
Table 1

Sample and locality list

Sample No.

Name of springs



Sampling date

TW-1, TG-1

Takarazuka Tibori

34° 47′51.66″

135° 22′01.32″

12 December 2007


Takarazuka Spa

34° 48′20.22″

135° 20′13.56″

12 December 2007

AW-1, AG-1


34° 48′12.42″

135° 12′51.60″

13 December 2007



34° 47′41.94″

135° 15′02.04″

13 December 2007



34° 47′46.08″

135° 14′57.12″

13 December 2007



34° 47′45.96″

135° 14′57.12″

13 December 2007

AW-5, AG-5


34° 47′47.34″

135° 14′52.80″

13 December 2007



34° 47′49.32″

135° 14′54.42″

13 December 2007



34° 47′55.86″

135° 14′50.28″

13 December 2007


Mint Resort Inn

34° 48′11.28″

135° 14′59.28″

14 December 2007


Ginsuiso Ginsen south

34° 48′03.48″

135° 14′47.94″

14 December 2007


Ginsuiso Ginsen north

34° 48′06.66″

135° 14′51.18″

14 December 2007


Ginsuiso Kinsen

34° 48′06.42″

135° 14′50.88″

14 December 2007


Choraku Kinsen

34° 48′12.72″

135° 14′49.62″

14 December 2007

The studied area is within 600 m zonally and 900 m meridionally in Arima. In addition, two samples were obtained in Takarazuka, about 10 km east of Arima, where most of the springs flow naturally from shallow (40 m in depth) to deep (1500 m) reservoirs or flow paths along the faults (e.g., Kozuki 1962), with a temperature range of 19°C to 96°C (Table 1).

In order to acquire a multi-element and multi-isotope dataset for each sample, the following measurements and analyses were performed for the sampled solutions and gases: (1) Temperature, pH, and electrical conductivity (EC; Table 2) of waters were conducted in situ at sampling sites. (2) Concentrations of cations and anions of water samples were determined with ion chromatography (DXi-500; Thermo Scientific Dionex, CA, USA). (3) Alkalinity, in reference to the concentration of total dissolved HCO3, was determined by titrating with H2SO4 up to a pH of 4.8. (4) Hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes were measured by mass spectrometric analysis (Delta V advantage and Delta plus, Thermo-Fisher Scientific Inc., Bremen, Germany). H2 generated by the H2O-H2 reduction method by 800°C metal chromium was applied for δD analyses, and CO2 generated by the automated H2O-CO2 equilibration method was applied for δ18O analyses. (5) The stable carbon isotopic ratio (δ13C) of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), which was conventionally represented with respect to Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB), was measured by continuous flow isotope-ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) with a gas chromatography system (Delta-V Advantage and GasBench II, Thermo-Fisher Scientific Inc.). The detailed procedures have been described by Takahashi et al. (2013). (6) Helium and neon concentrations and the helium isotope ratios were measured with a noble gas mass spectrometer, model MM5400 (Micromass UK Ltd., Manchester, UK). Technical details of the extraction of dissolved noble gases and the mass spectrometry, including the purification procedures, have been described by Morikawa et al. (2008). (7) Sr concentrations were measured with an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICPMS; ELAN DRC II, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) after dilution of the sample with HNO3 containing the indium internal standard. (8) Sr isotope ratios were determined with a thermal ionization mass spectrometer (TIMS; TRITON, Thermo Finnigan, Thermo-Fisher Scientific Co. Ltd., Hudson, NH, USA) after chemical separation of Sr using a 0.3-mL DCTA-pyridine cation-exchange column with a procedure modified after Birck (1986). Laboratory analyses (2) to (6) were performed at the Geological Survey of Japan, AIST; (7) and (8) were performed at the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology.
Table 2

Analytical results of the Arima and Takarazuka hot spring waters and gases


TW-1 [TG-1]


AW-1 [AG-1]




AW-5 [AG-5]








Temperature (°C)






























EC (mS/cm)















Depth (m)















δ 180SMOW (‰)















δ DSMOW (‰)















δ 13CPDB (‰)















F (mg/L)















C1 (mg/L)















Br (mg/L)















SO4 (mg/L)















Li (mg/L)















Na (mg/L)















NH4 (mg/L)















K (mg/L)















Mg (mg/L)















Ca (mg/L)















HCO3 (mg/L)















3He/4He (10-6)

7.11 [8.92]


8.98 [9.42]




3.84 [10.51]








3He/4He (Ra)

5.08 [6.37]


6.41 [6.73]




2.75 [7.51]








4He (10-8)

13.87 [11.51]


499.7 [646.9]




4.08 [3.35]








20Ne (10-7)

0.79 [0.58]


0.44 [2.83]




0.98 [0.042]









1.75 [19.90]


113.9 [228.3]




0.42 [79.5]








Sr (mg/L)






























nk, not known; na, not analyzed. The concentrations of noble gases are shown in [cm3 STP (noble gas)/g (sampled water)]. TG-1, AG-1, and AG-5 are the gas samples for which the He and Ne data shown in square brackets are available.

Elemental and isotopic composition

The results are listed in Table 2. Both the solute concentrations and the isotopic ratios of hydrogen, helium, carbon, oxygen, and strontium exhibited wide variations. The chlorine concentration ranges from 14 to approximately 40,000 ppm (up to twice that of seawater), the lithium concentration ranges from 0.02 to 51.90 ppm (0.2 to 300 times that of seawater), and the air-normalized 3He/4He ratio ranges from 2.33 to 7.51 (close to that of the upper mantle represented by mid-ocean ridge basalt). In order to discuss origin of the brines that may potentially involve multiple source materials and processes, analyses based on multiple element/isotope data, as shown in Table 2, are useful for clarifying, for example, the association of elements/isotopes derived from individual sources. Such multiple element/isotope studies, including hydrocarbon species, on brine or gas from various tectonic settings such as subduction zones (e.g., Mutnovsky Volcano, Kamchatka; Zelenski et al. 2012), ocean islands (e.g., Socorro Island, Mexico; Taran et al. 2010), and continental-oceanic rifts (Salton Sea, USA; Mazzini et al. 2011) have been successfully used to identify various sources. These sources include altered basaltic oceanic crust (AOC), oceanic sediment, and continental and mantle sources, and their modification by chemical and thermal processes such as mixing, serpentinization, and near-surface cooling.

The correlation matrix, in which correlation coefficients are arranged in a matrix consisting of individual elements/isotopes to be correlated to show the correlation coefficient at their intersection cell (Figure 2), shows an overall data structure. Many of the major solute elements/ions such as Cl, Na, Li, Br, Ca, Sr, NH4, and K have sharp positive correlations with δ18O and δD, resulting in a strong correlation with the electrical conductivity (EC indicated by asterisk in Figure 2). On the contrary, 3He/4He and SO4 are broadly and negatively correlated with δ18O, δD, and other solute elements, whereas 87Sr/86Sr, δ13C, HCO3, and F, as well as temperature and pH, are poorly correlated with the major solute elements. The sharp positive correlation among δ18O, δD, and the major solute elements is detailed below.
Figure 2

Correlation matrix among the major solute concentrations and physical–chemical properties. Color coding represents the correlation coefficient: large positive values (0.5) are red, intermediate values (0.5 to -0.5) are white, and small values ( - 0.5) are blue. EC*, electrical conductivity; T*, temperature; pH*, hydrogen ion exponent.

Figure 3 presents the δ18O-δD diagram, in which the data form a linear trend toward a magmatic water composition distinct from the meteoric water line or seawater. Figure 4 presents the selected major element and δD diagrams, again showing linear trends of least squares regression with high coefficients of determination (R2 = 0.84 to 0.99). In Figure 3 and in the bottom two subpanels of Figure 4, each data point is labeled with the (abbreviated) sample number as in Tables 1 and 2, indicating a consistent sample array from AW-2, which is closer to or almost on the meteoric water line, to AW-11, which is closer to magmatic water. It should be noted that the same symbols are used in Figures 2 and 3; light blue diamonds represent the samples from Arima, and dark blue diamonds represent the samples from Takarazuka.
Figure 3

δ 18 O versus δD diagram of the Arima hot spring waters and the predicted δ 18 O-δD evolution lines of slab-derived fluids. Red and green lines represent the evolution lines as a function of depth for the Philippine Sea slab (beneath southwestern Japan) and the Pacific slab (beneath northeastern Japan), respectively. The solid circles along the evolution lines indicate depth with intervals of 10 km. Red open star represents δ18O and δD of seawater, which is defined as 0‰ standard mean ocean water (SMOW). Blue open star at δ18O and δD ~ (+8,-40) represents the initial values of altered oceanic crust (AOC) just before subduction (Muehlenbachs 1986; Kawahata et al. 1987). Solid black line in the negative δ18O field represents the average meteoric water line in Japan (Masuda et al.1985). Large purple circle labeled ‘Magmatic water’ represents the reported range of the worldwide δ18O and δD of magmatic fluids, fumarolic gases, and andesitic waters after White (1957), Matsuo et al. (1974), Sakai and Matsubaya (1977), Mizutani (1978), and Giggenbach (1992).

Figure 4

Variation diagrams for chlorine versus major elements and δD for Arima hot spring waters. The least squares fitting line expressed by the equation in each subpanel is shown with the coefficient of determination (R2).

The new dataset and the linear trends confirm the previous results, which suggest mixing of local meteoric water in the Arima area (δD approximately -50‰ with nearly zero for all the solute concentrations, Masuda et al. 1985) and a deep-seated brine (e.g., Matsubaya et al. 1973; Tanaka et al. 1984; Masuda et al. 1985). Based on the new data, we quantitatively estimated the deep brine composition. The previously observed relationship between 3H and δD of the Arima hot spring waters, δD of the tritium-free water, i.e., a pure deep brine, is inferred to be -30‰ to -35‰ (Tanaka et al. 1984). Then, the least squares regression lines at δD = -30‰ to -35‰ provide the estimate on the brine composition: Cl- = 42,000 mg/L, Na+ = 21,000 mg/L, Li+ = 55 mg/L, Br- = 84 mg/L, Ca2+ = 3,100 mg/L, Sr2+ = 86 mg/L, NH4+ = 8.8 mg/L, K+ = 3,700 mg/L, and δ18O = +6‰ at δD = -33‰, which are similar to but slightly more diluted than the previous estimates by Masuda et al. (1985).

Oxygen and hydrogen isotopes of slab-derived fluid

In order to test the origin of the deep brine, a numerical model was developed to estimate the oxygen and hydrogen isotope compositions of the slab-derived fluid. The model considers the thermal structure along the subducting slab in a 2D across-arc section, stability and dehydration reaction of hydrous mineral phases, and the resultant partitioning of oxygen and hydrogen isotopes between the fluid and the residual mineral phases.

First, the thermal structure of the subduction zone was calculated because dehydration from subducting slabs is controlled thermodynamically and hence chiefly by temperature and pressure. Since dehydration mainly occurs within hydrated oceanic crusts consisting of both sediment and AOC rather than the underlying oceanic mantle (e.g., Iwamori 2007), the temperature distribution along the surface of a slab is calculated as a function of subduction velocity (V), slab age (a), and subduction angle (θ), using an analytical expression based on that reported by England and Wilkins (2004). As a result, we estimated the thermal profile along the slab surface for the subducting Philippine Sea slab (V = 4 cm/year, a = 15 Ma, θ = 20°) beneath the southwestern Japan arc, as well as that for the Pacific slab (V = 10 cm/year, a = 120 Ma, θ = 30°) beneath the northeastern Japan arc. These thermal profiles, shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1, are similar to those obtained in 2D numerical simulation (e.g., approximately 600°C at 3 GPa; Iwamori 2007).

Next, slab dehydration and the isotopic fractionation of oxygen and hydrogen were calculated, based on the phase relation of the subducted materials. Although oceanic sediments initially contain 10 to 30 wt% H2O (Plank and Langmuir 1998), most of water is liberated, decreasing to 2 to 4 wt% by extensive compaction and dehydration of minerals at depths shallower than 30 km (You et al. 1996; Hyndman and Peacock 2003; Kasahara 2003). The sedimentary column currently delivered to deep sea trenches is typically 50 to 500-m thick, and sediment 350-m-thick subducts from the Nankai Trough (Plank and Langmuir 1998). These values are 1/100 to 1/10 thinner than the AOC thickness, limiting its impact on the water budget in subduction zones. Considering these factors, although oceanic sediments still contain 1 to 2 wt% of H2O at depths greater than 100 km, the AOC-derived fluids are thought to be a major source that supplies deep-seated fluids to the overlying mantle wedge and the arc crust over the slab depth ranging from 30 to 100 km (Iwamori 2007), including the Arima area (Figure 1). Therefore, to simplify the model, we considered only dehydration of AOC and its phase relations for dehydration reaction (Schmidt and Poli 1998). It should be noted, however, that several key elements/isotopes such as carbon and lead, which are particularly concentrated in sediments, may have significant impacts on the fluid compositions (e.g., Sano and Marty 1995; Aizawa et al. 1999; Nakamura et al. 2008), as will be subsequently discussed.

A model was then designed to estimate the isotopic characteristics of slab-derived fluids for the hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopic ratios that constitute the characteristic features of Arima-type brine. The major constituent minerals of AOC at the pressure-temperature condition beneath the Arima area (i.e., 1.5 to 2.4 GPa and 400°C to 500°C, including uncertainty in the estimates), where major dehydration of AOC occurs, are amphibole (22% to 48% in modal composition), lawsonite (22% to 36%), chlorite (0% to 13%), and epidote (9% to 22%; Schmidt and Poli 1998). Accordingly, the following water/mineral isotopic fractionation factors (α) for the major constituent minerals of AOC are used.

Amphibole: The hydrogen isotopic fractionation factor (Graham et al. 1984) is expressed with
10 3 ln α = + 23 T < 750 ° C , or = 26 10 6 T - 2 3 T > 750 ° C
and the oxygen isotopic fractionation factor (Zheng et al. 1994) follows
1 0 3 ln α = - 0.42 10 6 T - 2 + 2.4
Lawsonite: The hydrogen isotopic fractionation factor (Suzuoki and Epstein 1976) is expressed with
10 3 ln α = + 26.4 T < 350 ° C , or = 22.4 10 6 T - 2 - 28.2 - 2 10 3 T - 1 T > 350 ° C
and the oxygen isotopic fractionation factor (Wenner and Taylor 1971) follows
1 0 3 ln α = - 2.3 10 6 T - 2 + 3.8
Chlorite: The hydrogen isotopic fractionation factor (O’Neil 1986) is expressed with
10 3 ln α = + 32.7 T < 350 ° C , or = 2.67 10 6 T - 2 + 25.3 T > 350 ° C
and the oxygen isotopic fractionation factor (Wenner and Taylor 1971) follows
1 0 3 ln α = - 1.56 10 6 T - 2 + 4.70

where T is the absolute temperature. Epidote is one of the major constituent minerals in AOC at up to 22 wt% (Schmidt and Poli 1998) for the P-T range of interest up to 3 GPa and 600°C in this study, respectively. Matthews et al. (1983) reported that below 600°C, the oxygen exchange reaction is very slow between water and zoisite, the Fe-free end-member of epidote group minerals; therefore, no isotopic fractionation occurs. Instead, dissolution-precipitation appears to occur. In addition, the zoisite-water fractionation factor constrained by mineral-pair equations is around unity (Matthews et al. 1983), causing no 18O/16O fractionation. For these reasons, we ignored epidote in our estimates.

The Rayleigh fractionation of oxygen and hydrogen isotopes was calculated by numerically integrating the following equation along the calculated P-T path for the Philippine Sea slab to obtain the compositional path in Figure 3: Δδf /1,000 = -(1-F)/Ff/r - 1) × ln (1 - F) (Equation 7), where Δδf is the change in isotopic ratio of the fluid corresponding to the infinitesimal change in P-T (‰), F is the extent of dehydration reaction constrained from the phase diagram as a function of P-T (weight fraction), and αf/r is the isotopic fractionation coefficient between the fluid and the bulk rock calculated as ΣXi αi, where Xi represents the weight fraction of mineral i, and αi is the fractionation factor derived from Equation 1 to 6.

The calculation starts with an average composition of AOC (δD = -40‰, δ18O = +8‰) obtained from a DSDP Hole 504B drill core >1,000-m long that includes fine-grained basalt to dolerite (Muehlenbachs 1986; Kawahata et al. 1987), as shown by the open star labeled ‘0 km’ in Figure 3. The δD value used (i.e., -40‰) is within the range reported from ODP/IODP Hole 1256D (-64‰ to -25‰, Shilobreeva et al. 2011). A shallow dehydration of this AOC produces relatively light oxygen isotopes (δ18O of approximately 0‰) and heavy hydrogen isotopes (δD of approximately -15‰) compared with those estimated in the Arima deep brine, which evolves toward the bottom right of the diagram. The results, showing larger δ18O and smaller δD values as the subduction progresses, reflect continuous dehydration and Rayleigh isotopic fractionation. The subducted young Shikoku Basin and its extinct spreading center (approximately 15 Ma; Okino et al. 1994; Sano et al. 2009) beneath the Arima area may share thermal and hydration conditions with a young oceanic crust at the 504B site off the Costa Rica Rift (approximately 6 Ma), partly justifying the assumed isotopic composition in Figure 3. Nevertheless, subducting slabs exhibit significant compositional variability, e.g., δD = -30‰ to -60‰, including sediment, AOC, and serpentinite (Kawahata et al. 1987; Giggenbach 1992; Matsuhisa 1992; Shaw et al. 2008), and causes significant uncertainty in the quantitative results of our model. As a consequence, the slab dehydration depth estimated for the Arima deep brine ranges from 45 to 70 km, as shown by the pink circle in Figure 3).

Beneath the Arima area, the depth of the Philippine Sea slab surface is estimated to be 50 to 70 km with relatively large uncertainty (Figure 1; Nakajima and Hasegawa 2007; Hirose et al. 2008). Our numerical model suggests that the slab-derived fluid at such depth has an isotopic composition similar to that of geochemically estimated deep brine within the uncertainty, as shown in Figure 3.

The estimated brine composition of δD at approximately -30‰ is similar to that estimated from analysis on back-arc basin basalts or melt inclusions from the Mariana subduction zone such as -25‰ (Poreda 1985) and -32‰ (Shaw et al. 2008), respectively, and the mass balance of subduction zone-scale material cycling at δD = -27‰ (Kazahaya 1997). The compositional range resembles magmatic fluids, although Arima is far from the volcanoes and is located in the forearc region in terms of northwestward subduction of the Philippine Sea Plate from the Nankai Trough. Westward subduction of the Pacific Plate causes magmatism in central Japan (e.g., Nakamura et al. 2008); Arima is located approximately 300 km west in the backarc region of the magmatism (Figure 1). The current understanding of the magma genesis, including the regional understanding along the entire Japan arcs (Iwamori 2007), indicates no magmatic production or supply beneath the Arima area.

Discussion and conclusions

The 3He/4He ratio may provide crucial information of whether the observed geochemical features reflect the slab-derived fluid directly or if they are affected significantly by arc crust during ascent because the incorporation of crustal components significantly reduces the ratio. Figure 5a shows the 3He/4He ratios for the brine samples as well as the gas samples from the three gas-rich brines. Almost all of the sample plots within the two mixing curves including one between air-saturated water (ASW) and the upper mantle component (8 Ra) and the other between ASW and a component having 3He/4He ratios of 8 × 10-6 (5.7 Ra), indicating high contribution of the mantle component with minor crustal contamination (Figure 5a). Masuda et al. (1985) argued that the high 3He/4He ratios of the Arima hot spring brines are attributed to deep-lying magma and its interaction with the crustal rocks, together with diluted carbonated waters from the basement Paleozoic sedimentary rocks and the Cretaceous to Paleogene acidic igneous rocks that account for the overall δ18O-δD and solute variations of the Arima hot spring waters. Magmatic activity is certainly important for the origin of deep brines in some geothermal fields such as Salton Sea and Cerro Prieto with high Cl content and high 3He/4He ratios, where heat and material input (particularly gas in this case) from subaerial but mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB)-type magmatism at depth interacts with the overlying thick sedimentary basin (Mazzini et al. 2011; Schmitt et al. 2013).
Figure 5

Helium and carbon systematics of the sampled waters and gases. (a) 4He/20He versus 3He/4Ne diagram of the sampled waters and gases. Light blue diamonds represent samples from Arima; dark blue diamonds (TW-1 and TW-2) represent samples from Takarazuka. Red circles represent gas samples. Two mixing curves are drawn, one between air-saturated water (ASW) and the upper mantle component and the other between ASW and a component having 3He/4He ratio of 8 × 10-6, considering possible but slight crustal contamination. (b) δ13C versus CO2/3He diagram of the sampled waters. Yellow, pink, and purple boxes represent the three end-members of sediment-, limestone-, and mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB)-derived carbon, respectively (Sano and Marty 1995). Solid curves represent mixing between MORB and limestone and MORB and sediment. Open gray box represents the compositional range for arc volcanic gases (Sano and Marty 1995).

However, as discussed in the previous section, the Arima hot spring is different in that no magmatic activity is expected beneath the area and no thick sedimentary basin exists (Kozuki 1962). Since the absolute concentrations of 3He in AOC, oceanic sediment, and ASW are four to six orders of magnitude lower than those in MORB (Zelenski et al. 2012), the high 3He/4He ratios found in the Arima hot springs are attributed to mantle helium incorporated in the fluid upon its ascent in the mantle. Arima is located in an area with hot springs of relatively high 3He/4He ratios (greater than 2.5 Ra) known as the Kinki Spot (Sano and Wakita 1985; Figure 1). The Philippine Sea slab subducted beneath the Kinki Spot is young and hot because it is associated with the former spreading ridge (Sano et al. 2009), which may have enhanced the degassing of the mantle.

The 3He/4He ratios are along the mixing line between the air and the mantle component, although the proportions of mixing differ from those identified from the solute concentrations (Figure 4). It is argued that shallow reservoirs exist beneath Arima (e.g., Masuda et al. 1985), where the meteoric water saturated with air mixes with both the deep brine and the exsolved gas and may cause variable mixing of the solutes and the gases. The broad negative correlation between the major solute elements and 3He/4He (Figure 2; Figure 5a) suggests that the spring waters diluted significantly by meteoric water in the shallow reservoir (e.g., AW-1, AW-2, and AW-9, Figures 2 and 3) have been fluxed by high 3He/4He gases (e.g., AG-1 and AG-5, Table 2 and Figure 5a) possibly derived from the deep brine (e.g., AW-3, AW-4, and AW-5) that ascends to the surface without being re-gassed.

Carbon dioxide is one of the dominant volatiles in magmatic fluids and gases in subduction zones, which is also one of the distinguishing characteristics of Arima-type brine, and could have originated from slab fluids (Jarrard 2003; Fischer 2008). The plausible sources of carbon are (1) organic carbon in sediments, which are mainly in the continental crust although subducted oceanic sediments are reported to have similar values, (2) carbonate in subducted MORB (AOC), and (3) inorganic carbonate in subducted marine limestones (Nissenbaum et al. 1972; Marty and Jambon 1987; Sano and Marty 1995). In order to identify the origin of carbon, the correlation between δ13C and CO2/3He ratios is useful; in fact, hot spring gases in subduction zones can be explained by three-component mixing, as shown in Figure 5b (Sano and Marty 1995). Within this context, the observed carbon isotopic compositions of the Arima hot spring waters also suggest possible involvement of deep-seated slab materials such as subducted MORB and limestone rather than organic carbon from a shallow sedimentary reservoir (Figure 5b). The poor correlation between the major solute, mostly derived from subducted MORB, and the carbon isotopic ratios, mostly buffered by subducted limestone, may reflect decoupled processes of different lithologies in a subducted slab such as dehydration versus decarbonation.

The CO2/3He ratios vary significantly over four orders of magnitude with broadly constant δ13C (Figure 5b). Low CO2/3He samples (AW-1, AW-2, and AW-9; Figure 5b) exhibited relatively high 3He/4He (Figure 5a) and low solute concentrations (Figure 4), when compared with the high CO2/3He samples (AW-3, AW-4, and AW-5) with low 3He/4He and high solute concentrations. Sano and Marty (1995) argued that the CO2/3He ratio of bubbling gas is lower than that of volcanic hydrothermal water which exsolves the gas because CO2 is much more soluble to water than He. They suggested that significant CO2/3He fractionation occurs during the ascent of deep hydrothermal fluids associated with decompressional degassing. Such a fractionation mechanism may consistently explain the lower CO2/3He samples (AW-1, AW-2, AW-9) that have been fluxed by the gas with low CO2/3He and high 3He/4He ratios in a meteoric water-dominated shallow reservoir, in addition to the high CO2/3He samples (AW-3, AW-4, AW-5) that contain more of the deep brine component from which the gas has been exsolved.

It has been argued that a high concentration of Cl- indicates an extensive water-rock interaction either at depth of a high temperature or with the granitic basement rocks at a relatively shallow depth (Edmunds et al. 1985). In the latter case, Cl- is derived from granitic rocks by acid hydrolysis of biotite and plagioclase. Since hydrolysis of biotite could generate Cl-, Li+, K+, and other species in the groundwater, Cl- and Li+ can be considered as conservative products of biotite alteration. On the contrary, the acid hydrolysis of plagioclase may contribute to the principal sources of Na+ and Ca2+ in the groundwater without supplying Cl- or Li+. Molar Cl-/Li+ and Na+/Ca2+ ratios of the sampled waters, however, reach up to about 150 and 12, respectively, which are significantly larger than the stoichiometry deduced from the above reactions. Although the possibility of such an excess of Na+ and Cl- owing to decreases in Ca2+, K+, and Mg2+ through the formation of clay minerals in the aquifer cannot be entirely ruled out, it appears difficult to attain the high salinity (approximately 42,000 ppm Cl) solely by chemical interactions between the basement granites and water (Edmunds et al. 1985).

The concentrations and isotopic ratios of Sr support binary mixing between diluted near-surface water (approximately represented by sample AW-2) and high-Sr deep brine (represented by AW-12; Figure 6). The estimated 87Sr/86Sr ratio of the deep brine is close to the estimated ratio of the Philippine Sea slab-derived fluid at 0.71087 and is distinct from the Pacific slab-derived fluid at 0.70538, possibly because the former has more terrigenous components subducted from the Nankai Trough (Plank and Langmuir 1998; Nakamura et al. 2008). The brine composition is also close to the lowermost range of the basement rocks including Rokko granite and the Arima group (approximately 0.707 to 0.710; Terakado and Nohda 1993). The interactions between the solutions and the basement rocks may have, to some extent, perturbed the 87Sr/86Sr ratios of the brine, which could have caused the poor correlation between the major solute concentrations (including Sr) and 87Sr/86Sr. However, the arguments above in terms of helium, carbon, and major solute stoichiometry suggest that the one end-member of the trend is likely to be deep brine originating from the subducted Philippine Sea slab, rather than the host country rocks.
Figure 6

Analyzed Sr concentration expressed by 1/Sr (ppm -1 ) versus 87 Sr/ 86 Sr of the Arima-type brine. Sr concentration expressed by 1/Sr (ppm-1) versus 87Sr/86Sr of the Arima-type brine analyzed in this study, together with the data of the Rokko granitoids and the Arima group consisting mainly of rhyolitic welded tuffs (Terakado and Nohda 1993). Large red and green stars represent slab fluid compositions derived from the subducted Philippine Sea Plate and Pacific Plate, respectively (Nakamura and Iwamori 2009). The analytical errors of 87Sr/86Sr ratio in this study are approximately 3 × 10-6.

Numerical forward modeling in this study suggests that slab fluids with δ18O-δD values similar to the Arima-type brine are produced along the subducted Pacific slab beneath the northeastern Japan arc (Figure 3). However, the produced fluid reacts with the mantle wedge just above the slab to form serpentinite due to the cold geotherm along the slab (Iwamori 2007). Therefore, the fluid is absorbed by the mantle and subducted to the deeper part along the slab, which may explain the absence of the Arima-type brine, to our knowledge, in the non-volcanic forearc region of northeastern Japan arc. On the contrary, in a warmer environment beneath the southwestern Japan arc, such an ‘absorption’ effect by serpentinite is greatly reduced (Iwamori 2007), and the slab fluid may escape to the surface without significant reaction with the country rocks, possibly guided by large faults at crustal levels.

It is also noted that the amount of fluid generated from the slab is maximum at depths of 30 to 80 km and is greatly reduced deeper than 100 km in most subduction zones (Iwamori 1998). Instead, beneath the northeastern Japan arc, the subducted serpentinite along the slab undergoes dehydration and supplies fluids upward beneath the arc volcanic zones, causing melting in a high-temperature region of the central part of the mantle wedge (Iwamori 1998). Then, hydrous magma is fed to a shallow chamber, where degassing may create volcanic waters and gases. Therefore, δ18O-δD compositions of the volcanic thermal waters, widely known as ‘andesitic water’ having δ18O = +5‰ to +10‰ and δD = -10‰ to -30‰ (Taran et al. 1989; Giggenbach 1992), integrate and reflect these processes of slab dehydration, sepentinite formation-dehydration, reaction with the mantle to cause melting, and degassing, as discussed by Matsuhisa (1992). In this context, andesitic water and the Arima-type brine as suggested in this study are believed to reflect different origins, although their δ18O-δD ranges overlap.

The estimated solute concentrations in the Arima deep brine (e.g., 42,000 ppm Cl; 3,700 ppm K; 84 ppm Br; Br/Cl ~ 2.0 × 10-3) are consistent with the recent knowledge on slab-derived fluids, e.g., 12,000 to 240,000 ppm Cl, 600 to 3,700 ppm for K, Br/Cl ~ 1.0 to 3.7 × 10-3 for fluids derived from subducted serpentinite (Kendrick et al. 2011), and 5.1 wt% NaCl (approximately 30,000 ppm Cl) for fluid inclusions in the mantle xenoliths (Kawamoto et al. 2013). On the contrary, the Philippine Sea slab-derived fluid compositions estimated from volcanic rocks in central Japan (Nakamura and Iwamori 2013) have higher concentrations for K and Sr (64,000 and 268 ppm, respectively), possibly reflecting different dehydration conditions of higher pressure and temperature beneath the volcanic region compared with those in the forearc region in southwestern Japan (Nakamura et al. 2014). It is also noted that during deep processes of dehydration and melting in subduction zones, Cl and F are reported to behave very differently (Straub and Layne 2003), which may explain the poor correlation between the major solute including Cl and F (Figure 2).

In any case, the composition of the Arima brine appears to retain the deep fluid signatures derived from multiple sources such as the subducted Philippine Sea slab and the overlying mantle, including (i) AOC for most water and hence hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in addition to associated elements such as Cl, Na, Li, Br, Ca, and Sr (Figure 2), (ii) subducted sediment, particularly limestone, for carbon, and (iii) mantle wedge for a high 3He/4He component. These signatures indicate that deep-seated fluid may reach the surface without significant interaction during its ascent, such as through channel flow from depth, as also suggested from the seismic velocity variations (Iwamori and Nakakuki 2013) and trace element transport in subduction zones (Ikemoto and Iwamori 2014). However, only a small amount of contamination by the basement granitic rocks with very high 87Sr/86Sr may have affected the Sr isotopic ratio of the fluid, and some crustal helium with low 3He/4He could have affected the degassed water samples such as AW-3, AW-4, and AW-5 with relatively low He content (Table 2). If such a fracture system is a dominant mode of fluid transport, the Arima-type brine may put direct constraints on both the compositions and processes of slab fluid at depth.



The authors would like to thank HA Takahashi, M Takahashi, M Tanimizu, and T Ishikawa for their help in elemental and isotopic analyses, M Totani for his kind arrangement and assistance in sampling hot spring waters in the Arima area, and the two anonymous referees for constructive review that greatly improved the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

26-1 Yamanokuchi Chitosecho-chitose
Department of Solid Earth Geochemistry, Japan Agency for Marine–Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC)
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology
Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)


  1. Aizawa Y, Tatsumi Y, Yamada H: Element transport by dehydration of subducted sediments: implication for arc and ocean island magmatism. Island Arc 1999, 8: 38–46. 10.1046/j.1440-1738.1999.00217.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Arai T: Geochemical characteristics of whole rock and minerals from the Late Cretaceous granitic rocks of the Rokko Mountains. J Mineral Petrol Sci 2007, 102: 12–23. 10.2465/jmps.041120View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Birck JL: Precision K–Rb–Sr isotopic analysis: application to Rb–Sr chronology. Chem Geol 1986, 56: 73–83. 10.1016/0009-2541(86)90111-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Brenan JM, Shaw HF, Ryerson FJ, Phinney DL: Mineral-aqueous fluid partitioning of trace elements at 900_C and 2.0 GPa: constraints on the trace element chemistry of mantle and deep crustal fluids. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 1995, 59: 3331–3350. 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00215-LView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Edmunds WM, Kay RLF, McCartney RA: Origin of saline groundwaters in the Carnmenellis granite (Cornwall, England): natural processes and reaction during hot dry rock reservoir circulation. Chem Geol 1985, 49: 287–301. 10.1016/0009-2541(85)90162-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. England P, Wilkins C: A simple analytical approximation to the temperature structure in subduction zones. Geophys J Int 2004, 159: 1138–1154. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02419.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Fischer TP: Fluxes of volatiles (H2O, CO2, N2, Cl, F) from arc volcanoes. Geochem J 2008, 42: 21–38. 10.2343/geochemj.42.21View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Giggenbach WF: Isotopic shifts in waters from geothermal and volcanic systems along convergent plate boundaries and their origin. Earth Planet Sci Lett 1992, 113: 495–510. 10.1016/0012-821X(92)90127-HView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Graham CM, Harmon RS, Sheppard SMF: Experimental hydrogen isotope studies—hydrogen isotope exchange between amphibole and water. Am Miner 1984, 69: 128–138.Google Scholar
  10. Hasegawa A, Nakajima J, Kita S, Tsuji Y, Nii K, Okada T, Matsuzawa T, Zhao D: Transportation of H2O in the NE Japan subduction zone as inferred from seismic observations. J Geophys Res 2008, 117: 59–75. (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  11. Hirose F, Nakajima JI, Hasegawa A: Three-dimensional seismic velocity structure and configuration of the Philippine Sea slab in southwestern Japan estimated by double-difference tomography. J Geophys Res 2008., 113: B09315, doi: 10.1029/2007JB005274Google Scholar
  12. Hyndman RD, Peacock SM: Serpentinization of the forearc mantle. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2003, 212: 417–432. 10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00263-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Ikemoto A, Iwamori H: Numerical modeling of trace element transportation in subduction zones: implications for geofluid processes. Earth Planets Space 2014, 66: 26. 10.1186/1880-5981-66-26View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ionov DA: Petrology of mantle wedge lithosphere: new data on supra-subduction zone peridotite xenoliths from the Andesitic Avacha Volcano, Kamchatka. J Petrol 2010, 51: 327–361. 10.1093/petrology/egp090View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ishikawa T, Nakamura E: Origin of the slab component in arc lavas from across-arc variation of B and Pb isotopes. Nature 1992, 370: 205–208.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Ishimaru S, Arai S: Arsenide in a metasomatized peridotite xenolith as a constraint on arsenic behavior in the mantle wedge. Am Mineral 2008, 93: 1061–1065. 10.2138/am.2008.2746View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Iwamori H: Transportation of H2O and melting in subduction zones. Earth Planet Sci Lett 1998, 160: 65–80. 10.1016/S0012-821X(98)00080-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Iwamori H: Transportation of H2O beneath the Japan arcs and its implications for global water circulation. Chem Geol 2007, 239: 182–198. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2006.08.011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Iwamori H, Albarède F: Decoupled isotopic record of ridge and subduction zone processes in oceanic basalts by independent component analysis. Geochem Geophys Geosys 2008., 9: doi: 10. 2007GC001753Google Scholar
  20. Iwamori H, Nakakuki T: Fluid processes in subduction zones and water transport to the deep mantle. In Physics and chemistry of the deep earth. Edited by: Karato S. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2013:446–468.Google Scholar
  21. Jarrard RD: Subduction fluxes of water, carbon dioxide, and potassium. Geochem Geophys Geosys 2003, 4: 8905. doi: 10.1029/2002GC000392View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kasahara J: The role of water in earthquake generation. In Toriumi M. Edited by: Kawamura K, Kasahara J. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  23. Kawahata H, Kusakabe M, Kikuchi Y: Strontium, oxygen, and hydrogen isotope geochemistry of hydrothermally altered and weathered rocks in DSDP Hole 504B, Costa Rica Rift. Earth Planet Sci Lett 1987, 85: 343–355. 10.1016/0012-821X(87)90132-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Kawamoto T, Yoshikawa M, Kumagai Y, Mirabueno MHT, Okuno M, Kobayashi T: Mantle wedge infiltrated with saline fluids from dehydration and decarbonation of subducting slab. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110: 9663–9668. 10.1073/pnas.1302040110View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kazahaya K: Discharged H2O from active island arc volcanoes: origin and flux. J Jpn Assoc Hydrol Sci 1997, 27: 105–116.Google Scholar
  26. Kendrick MA, Scambelluri M, Honda M, Phillips D: High abundances of noble gas and chlorine delivered to the mantle by serpentinite subduction. Nature Geo 2011., 4: doi: 10.1038/NGEO1270Google Scholar
  27. Keppler H: Constraints from partitioning experiments on the composition of subduction-zone fluids. Nature 1996, 380: 237–240. 10.1038/380237a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kessel R, Schmidt MW, Ulmer P, Pettke T: Trace element signature of subduction-zone fluids, melts and supercritical liquids at 120–180 km depth. Nature 2005, 437: 724–727. doi: 10.1038/nature03971 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kimura JI, Hacker BR, van Keken PE, Kawabata H, Yoshida T, Stern RJ: Arc Basalt Simulator version 2, a simulation for slab dehydration and fluid-fluxed mantle melting for arc basalts: modeling scheme and application. Geochem Geophys Geosys 2009., 10: Q09004, doi: 10.1029/2008GC002217Google Scholar
  30. Kogiso T, Tatsumi Y, Nakano S: Trace element transport during dehydration processes in the subducted oceanic crust: 1. Experiments and implications for the origin of ocean island basalts. Earth Planet Sci Lett 1997, 148: 193–205. 10.1016/S0012-821X(97)00018-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Kozuki J: Studies of Arima Spa. Nippon Shoin, Tokyo; 1962. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  32. Marty B, Jambon A: C/3He in volatile fluxes from the solid Earth: implications for carbon geodynamics. Earth Planet Sci Lett 1987, 83: 16–26. 10.1016/0012-821X(87)90047-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Masuda H, Sakai H, Chiba H, Tsurumaki M: Geochemical characteristics of Na–Ca–Cl–HCO3 type waters in Arima and its vicinity in the western Kinki district, Japan. Geochem J 1985, 19: 149–162. 10.2343/geochemj.19.149View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Matsubaya O: Origin of hot spring waters based on hydrogen and oxygen isotopic ratios. Hot Spring Sci 1981, 31: 47–56. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  35. Matsubaya O, Sakai H, Kusachi I, Satake H: Hydrogen and oxygen isotopic ratios and major element chemistry of Japanese thermal water systems. Geochem J 1973, 7: 123–151. 10.2343/geochemj.7.123View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Matsuhisa Y: Origin of magmatic waters in subduction zones: stable isotopic constraints. Rept Geol Surv Japan 1992, 279: 104–109.Google Scholar
  37. Matsumoto T, Kawabata T, Matsuda J, Yamamoto K, Mimura K: 3He/4He ratios in well gases in the Kinki district, SW Japan: surface appearance of slab-derived fluids in a non-volcanic area in Kii Peninsula. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2003, 216: 211–230.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Matsuo S, Suzuoki T, Kusakabe M, Wada H, Suzuki M: Isotopic and chemical compositions of volcanic gases from Satsuma-Iwojima, Japan. Geochem J 1974, 8: 165–173. 10.2343/geochemj.8.165View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Matthews A, Goldsmith JR, Clayton RN: Oxygen isotope fractionation between zoisite and water. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 1983, 47: 645–654. 10.1016/0016-7037(83)90285-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Mazzini A, Svensen H, Etiope G, Onderdonk N, Banks D: Fluid origin, gas fluxes and plumbing system in the sediment-hosted Salton Sea Geothermal System (California, USA). J Volcanol Geotherm Res 2011, 205: 67–83. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2011.05.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Mizutani Y: Isotopic composition of volcanic steam from Showashinzan Volcano, Hokkaido, Japan. Geochem J 1978, 12: 57–63. 10.2343/geochemj.12.57View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Morikawa N, Kazahaya K, Masuda H, Ohwada M, Nakama A, Nagao K, Sumino H: Relationship between geological structure and helium isotopes in deep groundwater from the Osaka Basin: application to deep groundwater hydrology. Geochem J 2008, 42: 61–74. 10.2343/geochemj.42.61View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Muehlenbachs K: Alternation of the oceanic crust and the 18O history of seawater. Rev Mineral 1986, 16: 425–444.Google Scholar
  44. Nagao K, Takaoka N, Matsubayashi O: Rare gas isotopic compositions in natural gases in Japan. Earth Planet Sci Lett 1981, 53: 175–188. 10.1016/0012-821X(81)90152-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Nakajima JI, Hasegawa A: Subduction of the Philippine Sea slab beneath southwestern Japan: slab geometry and its relationship to arc magmatism. J Geophys Res 2007., 112: B08306, doi: 10.1029/2006JB004770Google Scholar
  46. Nakamura H, Iwamori H: Contribution of slab fluid in arc magmas beneath the Japan arcs. Gondwana Res 2009, 16: 431–445. doi: 10.1016/ ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Nakamura H, Iwamori H: Generation of adakites in a cold subduction zone due to double subducting plates. Contrib Mineral Petrol 2013, 165: 1107–1134. doi: 10.1007/s00410-013-0850-0 10.1007/s00410-013-0850-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Nakamura H, Iwamori H, Kimura JI: Geochemical evidence for enhanced fluid flux due to overlapping subducting plates. Nature Geo 2008, 1: 380–384. 10.1038/ngeo200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Nakamura H, Fujita Y, Nakai S, Yokoyama T, Iwamori H: Rare earth elements and Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic analyses of the Arima hot spring waters, Southwest Japan: implications for origin of the Arima-type brine. J Geol Geosci 2014, 3: 161. doi: 10.4172/2329-6755.1000161Google Scholar
  50. Nishimura S: Forearc volcanism and hot-springs in Kii Peninsula, Southwest Japan. Hot Spring Sci 2000, 49: 207–216. (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  51. Nissenbaum A, Presley BJ, Kaplan IR: Early diagenesis in a reducing fjord, Saanich Inlet, British Columbia - I. Chemical and isotopic changes in major components of interstitial water. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 1972, 36: 1007–1104. 10.1016/0016-7037(72)90018-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. O’Neil JR: Stable isotopes in high temperature geological processes. Rev Mineral 1986, 16: 1–40.Google Scholar
  53. Okada T, Itaya T, Sato M, Nagao K: Noble gas isotopic composition of deep underground water in Osaka plain, central Japan: evidence for mantle He and model for new volcanism. Island Arc 1994, 3: 221–231. 10.1111/j.1440-1738.1994.tb00108.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Okino K, Shimakawa Y, Nagaoka S: Evolution of the Shikoku Basin. J Geomagn Geoelectr 1994, 46: 463–479. 10.5636/jgg.46.463View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Pearce JA, Stern RJ, Bloomer SH, Fryer P: Geochemical mapping of the Mariana arc-basin system: implications for the nature and distribution of subduction components. Geochem Geophys Geosys 2005., 6: Q07006, doi: 10.1029/2004GC000895Google Scholar
  56. Plank T, Langmuir CH: The chemical composition of subducting sediment and its consequences for the crust and mantle. Chem Geol 1998, 145: 325–394. 10.1016/S0009-2541(97)00150-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Poreda R: Herium-3 and deuterium in back-arc basalts: Lau Basin and the Mariana Trough. Earth Planet Sci Lett 1985, 73: 244–254. 10.1016/0012-821X(85)90073-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Sakai H, Matsubaya O: Stable isotopic studies of Japanese geothermal systems. Geothermics 1977, 5: 97–124. 10.1016/0375-6505(77)90014-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Sakai H, Matsuhisa Y: Stable isotope geochemistry. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo; 1996. 403 pp; (in Japanese) 403 pp; (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  60. Sano Y, Marty B: Origin of carbon in fumarolic gas from island arcs. Chem Geol 1995, 119: 265–274. 10.1016/0009-2541(94)00097-RView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Sano Y, Wakita H: Geographical distribution of 3He/4He ratios in Japan - implications for arc tectonics and incipient magmatism. J Geophys Res 1985, 90: 8729–8741. 10.1029/JB090iB10p08729View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Sano Y, Kameda A, Takahata N, Yamamoto J, Nakajima J: Tracing extinct spreading center in SW Japan by helium-3 emanation. Chem Geol 2009, 266: 50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.10.020View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Schiano P, Clocchiatti R, Shimizu N, Maury RC, Jochum KP, Hofmann AW: Hydrous silica-rich melts in the sub-arc mantle and their relationship with erupted arc lavas. Nature 1995, 377: 595–600. 10.1038/377595a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Schmidt MW, Poli S: Experimentally based water budgets for dehydrating slabs and consequences for arc magma generation. Earth Planet Sci Lett 1998, 163: 361–379. 10.1016/S0012-821X(98)00142-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Schmitt AK, Martín A, Weber B, Stockli DF, Zou H, Shen C-C: Oceanic magmatism in sedimentary basins of the northern Gulf of California rift. Geol Soc Am Bull 2013, 125: 1833–1850. doi: 10.1130/B30787.1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Shaw AM, Hauri EH, Fischer TP, Hilton DR, Kelley KA: Hydrogen isotopes in Mariana arc melt inclusions: implications for subduction dehydration and the deep-Earth water cycle. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2008, 275: 138–145. 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.08.015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Shilobreeva S, Martinez I, Busigny V, Agrinier P, Laverne C: Insights into C and H storage in the altered oceanic crust: results from ODP/IODP Hole 1256D. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 2011, 75: 2237–2255. 10.1016/j.gca.2010.11.027View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Shinohara H: Volatile flux from subduction zone volcanoes: insights from a detailed evaluation of the fluxes from volcanoes in Japan. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 2013, 268: 46–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Straub SM, Layne GD: The systematics of chlorine, fluorine, and water in Izu arc front volcanic rocks: implications for volatile recycling in subduction zones. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 2003, 67: 4179–4203. 10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00307-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Suzuoki T, Epstein S: Hydrogen isotope fractionation between OH-bearing minerals and water. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 1976, 40: 1229–1240. 10.1016/0016-7037(76)90158-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Takahashi HA, Nakamura T, Tsukamoto H, Kazahaya K, Handa H, Hirota A: Radio carbon dating of groundwater in granite fractures in Abukuma Province, northeast Japan. Radio Carbon 2013, 55: 894–904.Google Scholar
  72. Tanaka K, Koizumi M, Seki R, Ikeda N: Geochemical study of Arima hot-spring waters, Hyogo, Japan, by means of tritium and deuterium. Geochem J 1984, 18: 173–180. 10.2343/geochemj.18.173View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Taran YA, Pokrovsky BG, Dubik YM: Isotopic composition and the origin of water from andesitic magmas. Trans Acad Sci USSR 1989, 304: 440–443.Google Scholar
  74. Taran YA, Varley NR, Inguaggiato S, Cienfuegos E: Geochemistry of H2- and CH4-enriched hydrothermal fluids of Socorro Island, Revillagigedo Archipelago, Mexico. Evidence for serpentinization and abiogenic methane. Geofluids 2010, 10: 542–555. doi: 10.1111/j.1468–8123.2010.00314.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Terakado Y, Nohda S: Rb-Sr dating of acidic rocks from the middle part of the Inner Zone of southwest Japan: tectonic implications for the migration of the Cretaceous to Paleogene igneous activity. Chem Geol 1993, 109: 69–87. 10.1016/0009-2541(93)90062-NView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Umeda K, Ogawa Y, Asamori K, Oikawa T: Aqueous fluids derived from a subducting slab: observed high 3He emanation and conductive anomaly in a nonvolcanic region, Kii Peninsula southwest Japan. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 2006, 149: 47–61. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2005.06.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Wenner DB, Taylor HP: Temperatures of serpentinization of ultramafic rocks based on O18/O16 fractionation between coexisting serpentine and magnetite. Contrib Mineral Petrol 1971, 32: 165–185. 10.1007/BF00643332View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. White DE: Magmatic, connate, and metamorphic waters. Geol Soc Am Bull 1957, 68: 1659–1682. 10.1130/0016-7606(1957)68[1659:MCAMW]2.0.CO;2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. You CF, Castillo PR, Gieskes JM, Chan LH, Spivack AJ: Trace element behavior in hydrothermal experiments: implications for fluid processes at shallow depths in subduction zones. Earth Planet Sci Lett 1996, 140: 41–52. 10.1016/0012-821X(96)00049-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Zelenski ME, Taran YA, Dubinina EO, Shapar VN, Polyntseva EA: Sources of volatiles for a subduction zone volcano: Mutnovsky Volcano, Kamchatka. Geochem Int 2012, 50: 502–521. 10.1134/S001670291204009XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Zheng YF, Metz P, Satir M: Oxygen-isotope fractionation between calcite and tremolite—an experimental study. Contrib Mineral Petrol 1994, 118: 249–255. 10.1007/BF00306646View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Kusuda et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.