- Article
- Published:
Shift of the mean magnetic field values: Effect of scatter due to secular variation and errors
Earth, Planets and Space volume 53, pages 31–44 (2001)
Abstract
Paleomagnetic data are mostly given in the form of field directions (inclinations and declinations) which depend nonlinearly on the model parameters (Gauss coefficients). Because of this nonlinearity, the means of the data are affected not only by the means of the parameters but also by their fluctuations. Defining the mean directions by the Fisher method decreases this effect but does not completely eliminate it. For various mean fields, we evaluate the effect of secular variation on the means of Fisher-averaged directions by the analytical (Taylor expansion to the second order) as well as by the numerical (Monte Carlo) method. It was shown that a significant amount of offset occurs in the field values because of the fluctuation caused by secular variation. In the case of an inclination anomaly, the effect of secular variation as a function of latitude is antisymmetric about the equator, similar to that of the axial octupole term (g 03 ). We also show that the measurement errors do not induce biases in the mean field data, provided that they are random and isotropic.
References
Barton, C. E., International Geomagnetic Reference Field: The seventh generation, J. Geomag. Geoelectr,49, 123–148, 1997.
Benkova, N. P., N. V. Adam, and T. N. Cherevko, Application of spherical harmonic analysis to magnetic declination data, Geomagn. Aeron., 10, 673 (Engl. Trans. 527–532), 1970 (in Russian).
Constable, C. G. and C. L. Johnson, Anisotropic paleosecular variation models: implications for geomagnetic field observables, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 115, 35–51, 1999.
Constable, C. G. and R. L. Parker, Statistics of the geomagnetic secular variation for the past 5 m.y., J. Geophys. Res., 93, 11569–11581, 1988.
Cox, A. V, Latitude dependence of the angular dispersion of the geomagnetic field, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc, 20, 253–269, 1970.
Creer, K. M., D. T. Georgi, and W. Lowrie, On the representation of the Quaternary and late tertiary geomagnetic fields in terms of dipoles and quadrupoles, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 33, 323–345, 1973.
Fisher, R. A., Dispersion on a sphere, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., A217, 295–305, 1953.
Glatzmaier, G. A. and P. H. Roberts, A three-dimensional self-consistent computer simulation of a geomagnetic field reversal, Nature, 377, 203–209, 1995.
Gubbins, D., Geomagnetic field analysis—I. stochastic inversion, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 73, 641–652, 1983.
Gubbins, D. and J. Bloxham, Geomagnetic field analysis—III. Magnetic fields on the core-mantle boundary, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 80, 695–713, 1985.
Gubbins, D. and P. Kelly, Persistent patterns in the geomagnetic field over the past 2.5 Myr, Nature, 365, 829–832, 1993.
Hoffman, K. A., Dipolar reversal states of the geomagnetic field and core-mantle dynamics, Nature, 359, 789–794, 1992.
Hulot, G., A. Khokholov, and J.-L. Le Mouël, Uniqueness of mainly dipolar magnetic fields recovered from directional data, Geophys. J. Int., 129, 347–354, 1997.
Jackson, D. D., The use of a priori data to resolve non-uniqueness in linear inversion, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 57, 137–157, 1979.
Johnson, C. L. and C. G. Constable, The time-averaged geomagnetic field as recorded by lava flows over the past 5 Myr, Geophys. J. Int., 122, 488–519, 1995.
Johnson, C. L. and C. G. Constable, The time-averaged geomagnetic field: global and regional biases for 0-5 Ma, Geophys. J. Int., 131, 643–666, 1997.
Kelly, P. and D. Gubbins, The geomagnetic field over the past 5 Myr, Geophys. J. Int., 128, 315–330, 1997.
Kono, M., Uniqueness problems in their spherical harmonic analysis of the geomagnetic field direction data, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 28, 11–29, 1976.
Kono, M. Paleosecular variation in field directions due to randomly varying Gauss coefficients, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 49, 615–631, 1997a.
Kono, M. Distributions of paleomagnetic directions and poles, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 103, 313–327, 1997b.
Kono, M. and O. Hiroi, Paleosecular variation of field intensities and dipole moments, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 139, 251–262, 1996.
Kono, M. and H. Tanaka, Mapping the Gauss coefficients to the pole and the models of paleosecular variation, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 47, 115–130, 1995.
Kono, M., H. Tanaka, and H. Tsunakawa, Spherical harmonic analysis of paleomagnetic data: the case of linear mapping, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 5817–5833, 2000a.
Kono, M., A. Sakuraba, and M. Ishida, Dynamo simulation and paleosecular variation models, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., A358, 1123–1139, 2000b.
Langel, R. A., The main field, in Geomagnetism, vol. 1, edited by J. A. Jacobs, pp. 249–512, Academic Press, London, 1987.
Langel, R. A. and R. H. Estes, A geomagnetic field spectrum, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 250–253, 1982.
McElhinny, M. W., P. L. McFadden, and R. T. Merrill, The time-averaged paleomagnetic field 0-5 Ma, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 25007–25027, 1996.
McFadden, P. L., R. T. Merrill, and M. W. McElhinny, Dipole/quadrupole family modeling of paleosecular variation, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 11583–11588, 1988.
Proctor, M. R. E. and D. Gubbins, Analysis of geomagnetic directional data, Geophys. J. Int., 100, 69–77, 1990.
Shure, L., R. L. Parker, and G. E. Backus, Harmonic splines for geomagnetic modelling, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 28, 215–229, 1982.
Tanaka, H., Circular asymmetry of the paleomagnetic directions observed at low latitude volcanic sites, Earth Planets Space, 51, 1279–1286, 1999.
Wilson, R. L., Permanent aspects of the Earth’s non-dipole magnetic field over upper tertiary times, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 19, 417–437, 1970.
Wilson, R. L., Dipole offset—The time average palaeomagnetic field over the past 25 million years, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 22, 491–504, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hatakeyama, T., Kono, M. Shift of the mean magnetic field values: Effect of scatter due to secular variation and errors. Earth Planet Sp 53, 31–44 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352360
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352360