Special Issue: Great Subduction Zone Earthquakes
- Article
- Published:
Northward migration of the Cascadia forearc in the northwestern U.S. and implications for subduction deformation
Earth, Planets and Space volume 53, pages 275–283 (2001)
Abstract
Geologic and paleomagnetic data from the Cascadia forearc indicate long-term northward migration and clockwise rotation of an Oregon coastal block with respect to North America. Paleomagnetic rotation of coastal Oregon is linked by a Klamath Mountains pole to geodetically and geologically determined motion of the Sierra Nevada block to derive a new Oregon Coast—North America (OC-NA) pole of rotation and velocity field. This long-term velocity field, which is independent of Pacific Northwest GPS data, is interpreted to be the result of Basin-Range extension and Pacific-North America dextral shear. The resulting Oregon Coast pole compares favorably to those derived solely from GPS data, although uncertainties are large. Subtracting the long-term motion from forearc GPS velocities reveals ENE motion with respect to an OC reference frame that is parallel to the direction of Juan de Fuca-OC convergence and decreases inland. We interpret this to be largely the result of subduction-related deformation. The adjusted mean GPS velocities are generally subparallel to those predicted from elastic dislocation models for Cascadia, but more definitive interpretations await refinement of the present large uncertainty in the Sierra Nevada block motion.
References
Argus, D. F. and R. G. Gordon, Current Sierra Nevada-North America motion from very long baseline interferometry: Implications for the kinematics of the western United States, Geology, 19, 1085–1088, 1991.
Argus, D. F. and R. G. Gordon, Tests of the rigid-plate hypothesis and bounds on intraplate deformation using geodetic data from very long baseline interferometry, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 13,555–13,572, 1996.
Beck, M. E., Jr., R. F. Burmester, D. E. Craig, C. S. Gromme, and R. E. Wells, Paleomagnetism of middle Tertiary volcanic rocks from the western Cascade series, northern California, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 8219–8230, 1986.
Blake, M. C., Jr., D. S. Harwood, E. A. Helley, P. Irwin, A. S. Jayko, and D. L. Jones, Geologic Map of the Red Bluff 30′ Ă— 60′ Quadrangle, California, U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Map I-2542, scale 1:100,000, 1999.
Bucknam, R. C., E. Hemphill-Haley, and E. B. Leopold, Abrupt uplift within the past 1700 years at southern Puget Sound, Washington, Science, 258, 1611–1614, 1992.
DeMets, C. and T. H. Dixon, New kinematic models for Pacific-North America motion from 3 Ma to present, I: Evidence for steady motion and biases in the NUVEL-1A model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 1921–1924, 1999.
DeMets, C., R. G. Gordon, D. F. Argus, and S. Stein, Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 2191–2194, 1994.
Dixon, T. H., M. Miller, F. Farina, H. Wang, and D. Johnson, Present-day motion of the Sierra Nevada block and some tectonic implications for the Basin and Range province, North American Cordillera, Tectonics, 19, 1–24, 2000.
Dragert, H. and R. D. Hyndman, Continuous GPS monitoring of elastic strain in the northern Cascadia subduction zone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 755–758, 1995.
England, P. C. and R. E. Wells, Neogene rotations and continuum deformation of the Pacific Northwest convergent margin, Geology, 19, 978–981, 1991.
FlĂ¼ck, P., R. D. Hyndman, and K. Wang, Three-dimensional dislocation model for great earthquakes of the Cascadia subduction zone, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 20,539–20,550, 1997.
Frei, L. S., J. R. Magill, and A. V. Cox, Paleomagnetic results from the central Sierra Nevada: constraints on reconstructions of the western United States, Tectonics, 3, 157–178, 1984.
Globerman, B. R. and E. Irving, Mid-Cretaceous paleomagnetic reference field for North America; restudy of 100 Ma intrusive rocks from Arkansas, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 11,721–11,733, 1988.
Gromme, C. S., M. E. Beck, Jr., D. C. Engebretson, and R. E. Wells, Paleomagnetism of the Tertiary Clarno Formation of central Oregon and its significance for the tectonic history of the Pacific Northwest, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 14,089–14,103, 1986.
Hyndman, R. D. and K. Wang, The rupture zone of Cascadia great earthquakes from current deformation and the thermal regime, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 22,133–22,154, 1995.
Jennings, C., Geologic Map of California, California Division of Mines and Geology Geologic Map Data Series, scale 1:750,000, 1977.
Khazaradze, G., A. Qamar, and H. Dragert, Tectonic deformation in western Washington from continuous GPS measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3153–3156, 1999.
Magill, J. R., R. E. Wells, R. W. Simpson, and A. V. Cox, Post-12 m.y. rotation of southwest Washington, J. Geophys. Res., 87, 3761–3776, 1982.
McCaffrey, R., M. D. Long, C. Goldfinger, P. C. Zwick, J. L. Nabelek, C. K. Johnson, and C. Smith, Rotation and plate locking along the southern Cascadia subduction zone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 3117–3120, 2000.
Pezzopane, S. K. and R. J. Weldon, II, Tectonic role of active faulting in central Oregon, Tectonics, 12, 1140–1169, 1993.
Satake, K., K. Shimazaki, Y. Tsuji, and K. Ueda, Time and size of a giant earthquake in Cascadia inferred from Japanese tsunami records of January 1700, Nature, 379, 246–249, 1996.
Savage, J. C., J. L. Svarc, W. H. Prescott, and M. H. Murray, Deformation across the forearc of the Cascadia subduction zone at Cape Blanco, Oregon, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 3095–3102, 2000.
Sheriff, S. D., Paleomagnetic evidence for spatially distributed post-Miocene rotation of western Washington and Oregon, Tectonics, 3, 397–408, 1984.
Snavely, P. D., Jr. and R. E. Wells, Cenozoic evolution of the continental margin of Oregon and Washington, in Assessing Earthquake Hazards and Reducing Risk in the Pacific Northwest, edited by A. M. Rogers, T. J. Walsh, W. J. Kockelman, and G. R. Priest, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1560, pp. 161–182, 1996.
Thatcher, W., G. R. Foulger, B. R. Julian, J. Svarc, E. Quilty, and G. W. Bawden, Present-day deformation across the Basin and Range Province, Western United States, Science, 283, 1714–1718, 1999.
Walcott, D., Neogene kinematics of western North America, Tectonics, 12, 326–333, 1993.
Wang, K., Simplified analysis of horizontal stresses in a buttressed fore-arc sliver at an oblique subduction zone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 2021–2024, 1996.
Wang, K., J. He, H. Dragert, and T. James, Three-dimensional viscoelastic interseismic deformation model for the Cascadia subduction zone, Earth Planets Space, 53, this volume, 295–306, 2001.
Wells, R. E., R. W. Simpson, R. D. Bentley, M. H. Beeson, M. T. Mangan, and T. L. Wright, Correlation of Miocene flows of the Columbia River Basalt Group from the central Columbia River Plateau to the coast of Oregon and Washington, in Volcanism and Tectonism in the Columbia River Flood Basalt Province, edited by P. Hooper and S. Reidel, Geol. Soc. Amer. Special. Paper 239, 113–130, 1989.
Wells, R. E. and R. S. Coe, Paleomagnetism and geology of Eocene volcanic rocks of southwest Washington, implications for mechanisms of tectonic rotation, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 1925–1947, 1985.
Wells, R. E., C. S. Weaver, and R. J. Blakely, Fore-arc migration in Cascadia and its neotectonic significance, Geology, 26, 759–762, 1998.
Wernicke, B. and J. K. Snow, Cenozoic tectonism in the central Basin and Range: motion of the Sierran-Great Valley block, in Intergrated Earth and Environmental Evolution of the Southwestern United States, edited by W. G. Ernst and C. A. Nelson, pp. 111–118, Bellwether Publishing, Ltd., 1998.
Yamaguchi, D. K., B. F. Atwater, D. E. Bunker, B. E. Benson, and M. S. Reid, Tree-ring dating the 1700 Cascadia earthquake, Nature, 389, 922–923, 1997.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wells, R.E., Simpson, R.W. Northward migration of the Cascadia forearc in the northwestern U.S. and implications for subduction deformation. Earth Planet Sp 53, 275–283 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352384
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352384