Tsunami source of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake
© The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS); The Seismological Society of Japan; The Volcanological Society of Japan; The Geodetic Society of Japan; The Japanese Society for Planetary Sciences; TERRAPUB. 2011
Received: 9 April 2011
Accepted: 7 June 2011
Published: 27 September 2011
Tsunami waveform inversion for the 11 March, 2011, off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake (M 9.0) indicates that the source of the largest tsunami was located near the axis of the Japan trench. Ocean-bottom pressure, and GPS wave, gauges recorded two-step tsunami waveforms: a gradual increase of sea level (~2 m) followed by an impulsive tsunami wave (3 to 5 m). The slip distribution estimated from 33 coastal tide gauges, offshore GPS wave gauges and bottom-pressure gauges show that the large slip, more than 40 m, was located along the trench axis. This offshore slip, similar but much larger than the 1896 Sanriku “tsunami earthquake,” is responsible for the recorded large impulsive peak. Large slip on the plate interface at southern Sanriku-oki (~30 m) and Miyagi-oki (~17 m) around the epicenter, a similar location with larger slip than the previously proposed fault model of the 869 Jogan earthquake, is responsible for the initial water-level rise and, presumably, the large tsunami inundation in Sendai plain. The interplate slip is ~10 m in Fukushima-oki, and less than 3 m in the Ibaraki-oki region. The total seismic moment is estimated as 3.8 × 1022 N m (Mw = 9.0).
Key words2011 Tohoku Earthquake slip distribution tsunami waveform inversion ocean-bottom pressure gauge GPS wave gauge
The Pacific coasts of Tohoku have suffered from large tsunamis in the past. The 1896 Sanriku earthquake caused large (up to 38 m of run-up height) tsunamis on the Sanriku coast with 22,000 casualties, although the seismic shaking was not very strong. The source of the tsunami of this “tsunami earthquake” (Kanamori, 1972) was located near the trench axis (Tanioka and Satake, 1996b). The 1933 Sanriku earthquake, a large normal-fault earthquake (Kanamori, 1971) also caused a large (up to 29 m) tsunami with about 3,000 casualties. The tsunami heights from these Sanriku earthquakes were less than a few meters in the Sendai plain. However, the 869 Jogan earthquake produced a large tsunami inundation up to a few kilometers (Minoura and Nakaya, 1991), which was modeled by an interplate earthquake (Satake et al., 2008).
On the basis of large historical earthquakes, The Earthquake Research Committee (ERC) (2009) made long-term forecasts in northern, central, and southern Sanriku-oki, Miyagi-oki, Fukushima-oki and Ibaraki-oki regions, as well as tsunami earthquakes near the trench axis. The estimated earthquake size was M ~ 7.7 for southern Sanriku-oki, M ~ 7.5 for Miyagi-oki, M ~ 7.4 for Fukushima-oki, M ~ 6.7–7.2 for Ibaraki-oki, and M ~ 8.2 for offshore tsunami earthquakes. The ERC also considered a multiple segment rupture of the Miyagi-oki and southern Sanriku-oki regions with an estimated size of M ~ 8.0.
In this paper, we estimate the tsunami source of the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake by inverting tsunami waveforms recorded at tide and wave gauges, GPS wave gauges and ocean-bottom tsunami sensors.
2. Tsunami Data
Because of the severity and wide extent of the tsunami damage, tsunami field surveys are still ongoing. Preliminary surveys reported tsunami run-up heights exceeding 30 m (The 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami Joint Survey Group, 2011).
We use tsunami waveforms recorded at coastal tide and wave gauges, and offshore GPS wave gauges, deep-ocean bottom-pressure gauges (Fig. 1). While most of the coastal tide gauge stations went off-scale and did not record the tsunami peak, the arrival time and the initial slope recorded provide information on the tsunami source, hence we include them in the inversion. In order to retrieve a tsunami signal, we first approximate a tidal component by fitting a polynomial function, and then remove it from the original record.
3. Waveform Inversion
Slip distributions estimated by tsunami waveform inversion.
Slip and error (m)
To calculate tsunami propagation from each subfault to gauge stations, the linear shallow-water, or longwave, equations are numerically solved by using a finite-difference method (Fujii and Satake, 2007). Whilst the non-linearity becomes important around coastal tide gauge stations, we have confirmed, by comparing the nonlinear and linear computations, that they produce similar arrival times and initial slopes, while the peak amplitudes (not observed) are different. We use two sets of bathymetric data for calculating tsunami waveforms or Green’s functions. For the DART stations in the Pacific ocean, a 2′-interval grid for 125°–175°E and 15°–55°N is resampled from GEBCO_08 30″-grid data. For stations around Japan, a 30″-interval grid of JTOPO30, provided by the Marine Information Research Center, is used for 128°–150°E and 25°–45°N. Time steps of 3 s and 1 s are used to satisfy the stability condition for the finite-difference method in the far-field and near-field computations, respectively.
For the inversion, we use a non-negative least-square method (Lawson and Hanson, 1974) and a delete-half jack-knife method (Tichelaar and Ruff, 1989) to estimate slips and errors, respectively. The observed tsunami waveforms were resampled at 1 min intervals, hence synthetic waveforms are also computed at 1 min intervals. The total number of data points used for the inversion is 2818. Considering the different amplitude and signal durations of tsunami waveforms recorded on DART gauges, GPS gauges, and coastal tide gauge data, we use variable weights so that the relative powers become similar. We weight nearby GPS gauge and bottom-pressure data 10, 20, or 30 times, and near-source tide gauge data 2 times or 10 times, because the duration of these data are shorter than the far-field stations. We also weight the DART data ten times, because the amplitudes are much smaller.
4. The Slip Distribution
The inversion results are shown in Fig. 3(a) and Table 1. The result shows a tsunami source length (with >2 m slip) of about 350 km, extending from over southern Sanriku-oki, Miyagi-oki, Fukushima-oki as well as near the trench axis. The largest slips of more than 40 m are estimated along the Japan trench axis off southern Sanriku-oki (subfaults 4 and 5). Around the epicenter, in the southern Sanriku region (subfaults 14 and 15), the estimated slip is 28–34 m. On the deeper subfault in the Miyagi-oki region (subfaults 24, 25, 34 and 35), the slip is 9–23 m. To the north of the epicenter, 5–11 m slip is estimated in a part of central Sanriku region (subfault 13 and 23). To the south, the slip is ~ 10 m in the Fukushima-oki region (subfaults 27 and 28), and <3 m in the Ibaraki-oki region (subfaults 29 and 30). The total seismic moment is calculated from these slip distributions as 3.8 × 1021 N m (Mw = 9.0) by assuming a rigidity of 5.0 × 1010 N/m2 for all the subfaults. The slip distribution and the size clearly indicate that multiple segments of the ERC’s long-term forecast ruptured simultaneously.
Seafloor deformation calculated from the estimated slip distribution (Fig. 3(b)) shows a very large uplift (>10 m) near the trench axis and about 5-m uplift near the epicenter. Near the coast, subsidence up to 2 m, as observed by the GPS data (GSI, 2011) is predicted.
5. Discussions and Conclusions
The large slip estimated near the trench axis is similar to the 1896 Sanriku earthquake (Tanioka and Satake, 1996b), although the 2011 slip was much larger. Large offshore slip is responsible for the very large and destructive tsunami on the Sanriku coast. To confirm this, we computed tsunami waveforms from the large slip near the trench axis, and compared it with the tsunami waveforms at selected offshore stations (Fig. 2). The computed tsunami waveforms show later arrivals than the observed initial tsunami arrivals, but reproduce the large impulsive tsunamis.
Unlike the 1896 earthquake, large slip was also estimated on the plate interface at a deeper depth in the southern Sanriku-oki and Miyagi-oki regions. The initial gradual rise of sea level observed at some stations is due to interplate slip (Fig. 2). Large tsunami inundation (>5 km) in the Sendai plain may be due to such a nearshore, deeper slip on the plate interface. For the 869 Jogan tsunami, a similar large inundation (a few km) estimated from the tsunami deposits was reproduced only by an interplate model. A narrow fault near the trench axis (“tsunami earthquake” model) or an outer-rise normal fault model could not produce a large inundation, because of the shorter wavelength of seafloor deformation (Satake et al., 2008).
The inversion of available tsunami waveforms showed that the large tsunami from the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake was produced by both a very large displacement near the trench axis and a deeper interplate slip in the southern Sanriku-oki, Miyagi-oki, and Fukushima-oki regions. The former explains the largest and impulsive tsunami waveforms, while the latter reproduces the initial part of the tsunami waveforms, as well as the large inundation on the Sendai plain. The survey results of coastal tsunami run-up, for example >30 m near the central Sanriku-oki region, may require additional tsunami source(s), not revealed by available tsunami waveform data.
JCG and JMA provided tide gauge data. Ports and Harbors Bureau (PHB) under the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) and Port and Airport Research Institute (PARI) provided tide gauge, wave gauge and GPS wave gauge data. The data of ocean-bottom tsunami sensors of JAMSTEC and DART of NOAA were downloaded from their web sites. Most of the figures were generated using Generic Mapping Tools (Wessel and Smith, 1998). This research was partially supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (No. 21310113), Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT).
- Earthquake Research Committee, Long-term forecast of earthquakes from Sanriku-oki to Boso-oki (revised), Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion, 80 pp, 2009 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
- Fujii, Y. and K. Satake, Tsunami source of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake inferred from tide gauge and satellite data, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97, S192–S207, 2007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Geospatial Information Authority of Japan, The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake: Crustal deformation and fault model (preliminary), http://www.gsi.go.jp/cais/topic110313-index-e.html, 2011.
- Kanamori, H., Seismological evidence for a lithospheric normal faulting— The Sanriku earthquake of 1933, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 4, 289–300, 1971.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kanamori, H., Mechanism of tsunami earthquake, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 6, 346–359, 1972.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lawson, C. L. and R. J. Hanson, Solving Least Squares Problems, 340 pp., Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1974.Google Scholar
- Minoura, K. and S. Nakaya, Traces of tsunami preserved in inter-tidal lacustrine and marsh deposits: some examples from northeast Japan, J. Geol., 99, 265–287, 1991.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Okada, Y., Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a halfspace, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 75, 1135–1154, 1985.Google Scholar
- Satake, K., Y. Namegaya, and S. Yamaki, Numerical simulation of the AD 869 Jogan tsunami in Ishinomaki and Sendai plains, Ann. Rep. Active Fault Paleoearthq. Res., 8, 71–89, 2008 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
- Tanioka, Y. and K. Satake, Tsunami generation by horizontal displacement of ocean bottom, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 861–864, 1996a.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tanioka, Y. and K. Satake, Fault parameters of the 1896 Sanriku tsunami earthquake estimated from numerical modeling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 1549–1552, 1996b.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- The 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami Joint Survey Group, The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake Tsunami Information, http://www.coastal.jp/tsunami2011/, 2011.
- Tichelaar, B. W. and L. J. Ruff, How good are our best models? Jack-knifing, bootstrapping, and earthquake depth, Eos Trans. AGU, 70, 593, 605–606, 1989.Google Scholar
- Wessel, P. and W. H. F. Smith, New, improved version of the Generic Mapping Tools released, Eos Trans. AGU, 79, 579, 1998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar