Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of spectral analysis results for the 11 inversion-based slip models

From: Sensitivity of tsunami wave profiles and inundation simulations to earthquake slip and fault geometry for the 2011 Tohoku earthquake

Model ID

von Kármán parameters [A z (km), A x (km), H]

Grid spacing (km)

Box-Cox parameter

Mean and std. dev. of the original slip model (m)

Asperity rectangle fractiona[down-dip, along-strike]

Asperity concentration fractionb

1

[63, 68, 0.99]

25

0.2

[7.18, 8.41]

[0.35, 0.35]

0.4

2

[56, 107, 0.82]

25

0.2

[9.43, 11.75]

[0.25, 0.4]

0.3

3

[50, 119, 0.99]

10

0.3

[11.85, 11.14]

[0.25, 0.4]

0.35

4

[53, 84, 0.99]

10

0.3

[10.71, 12.54]

[0.3, 0.4]

0.35

5

[45, 93, 0.99]

10

0.3

[11.14, 14.10]

[0.3, 0.4]

0.35

6

[37, 72, 0.96]

10

0.2

[14.20, 13.92]

[0.3, 0.4]

0.4

7

[51, 94, 0.99]

10

0.3

[7.84, 10.48]

[0.4, 0.35]

0.3

8

[64, 86, 0.99]

25

0.2

[9.38, 10.35]

[0.3, 0.35]

0.3

9

[65, 94, 0.99]

10

0.2

[5.27, 6.21]

[0.3, 0.4]

0.3

10

[54, 141, 0.99]

10

0.1

[8.32, 7.90]

[0.3, 0.3]

0.25

11

[51, 81, 0.99]

10

0.0

[7.95, 12.11]

[0.45, 0.3]

0.45

  1. aThe fraction values of the asperity rectangle for the down-dip and along-strike directions are defined in terms of fault length and fault width of the original slip model. bThe fraction value of the asperity slip concentration is defined in terms of total slip over the fault plane.