Skip to main content

Table 1 Experimental conditions and results

From: Water content in arc basaltic magma in the Northeast Japan and Izu arcs: an estimate from Ca/Na partitioning between plagioclase and melt

Run#

Capsule#

Run durations (h)

T (°C)

Pressure (MPa)

Bulk H2O (wt.%)a

H2O in melt (wt.%)b

H2O in melt (wt.%)c

Phase and modal proportions (wt.%)d

Calculated fO2(ΔNNO)e

Relative Fe-loss (wt.%)f

K D pl-melt Ca-Na

An in plagioclase

HG442

C1838

12

1,150

100

0.77 (3)

0.91 (10)

 

Melt (85), pl (15)

 

−13

1.05 (17)

80.4

HG442

C1837

12

1,150

100

2.07 (9)

2.11 (13)

2.01 (19)

Melt (98), pl (2)

 

−6

2.21 (27)

88.4

G463

C1831

24

1,100

100

2.99 (12)

3.23 (17)

3.00 (25)

Melt (93), pl (5), mt (2)

 

0

3.14 (31)

91.3

G459

C1824

12

1,150

150

0.77 (3)

0.91 (10)

 

Melt (85), pl (15)

 

−11

0.93 (10)

76.9

G459

C1820

12

1,150

150

1.57 (11)

1.71 (16)

1.52 (14)

Melt (92), pl (8)

 

−8

1.56 (19)

84.7

G458

C1817

24

1,100

150

2.59 (9)

2.92 (10)

 

Melt (88), pl (10), mt (2)

 

−3

2.36 (33)

88.8

HG448

C1857

24

1,075

150

2.99 (12)

3.44 (13)

 

Melt (87), pl (10), mt (3)

 

1

2.78 (26)

90.2

G465

C1839

24

1,100

200

0.77 (3)

1.24 (11)

 

Melt (62), pl (32), ol (3), cpx (1), opx (2)

0.8

−14

1.06 (23)

79.4

G465

C1840

24

1,100

200

2.07 (9)

2.42 (10)

 

Melt (86), pl (12), mt (3)

 

5

2.11 (28)

87.7

G465

C1841

24

1,100

200

2.99 (12)

3.16 (13)

3.16 (27)

Melt (95), pl (3), mt (2)

 

6

2.42 (26)

89.9

  1. aH2O content of starting materials analyzed by transmittance measurements using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Standard deviation is indicated in parentheses; bH2O in melt calculated from mass balance. Standard deviation is indicated by parentheses; cH2O in melt analyzed by Δreflectance measurements using FTIR. Standard deviation is indicated in parentheses; dphase proportion in weight percent indicated by parentheses. Abbreviation of phases: pl, plagioclase; mt, magnetite; efO2 was calculated using the oxygen fugacity barometer (Sugawara 2001); fRelative Fe loss was calculated as (FeOafter − FeOstarting material)/FeOstarting material × 100. FeOafter is the summation of FeO (total Fe as FeO) from all phase in run products.