Skip to main content

Comparison between the KOMPSAT-1 drag derived density and the MSISE model density during strong solar and/or geomagnetic activities

Abstract

We have compared the KOrea Multi-Purpose SATellite-1 (KOMPSAT-1) drag derived density with the MSISE model (NRLMSISE-00 and MSISE-90) density during strong solar and/or geomagnetic activities. It is well known that there are two major mechanisms to induce satellite drag caused by atmospheric density enhancement: the heating by solar EUV radiation and joule heating associated with local geomagnetic current enhancements during geomagnetic storms. For this work we select five events dominated by the radiation effect and/or the geomagnetic effect. For these events we compared the satellite drag derived density with the MSISE model density. The major results can be summarized as follows. (1) The density predicted from the MSISE models during radiation dominated periods are comparable to the drag derived density but the MSISE model density during strong geomagnetic storms is significantly underestimated when the MSISE model density is compared to the drag derived density, by about two times for the NRLMSISE-00 model. (2) The ratios of the KOMPSAT-1 (around 685 km) drag derived density to the MSISE model density during a strong geomagnetic storm are abruptly enhanced (up to a factor of about 8 for the MSISE-90 model and about 3 for the NRLMSISE-00 model), which are much larger than previous estimates from low altitude (around 400 km) satellites. (3) There is a possible correlation between daily drag enhancement and daily Dst variation. We note that there is a remarkable difference in daily drag enhancement although solar and geomagnetic activities are quite similar to each other. We suggest that such a difference should be explained by the accumulation of solar radiation effect depending on solar activity cycle.

References

  • Burke, W. J., C. Y. Huang, F. A. Marcos, and J. O. Wise, Interplanetary Contral of Thermospheric Densities during Large Magnetic Storms, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 69, 279–287, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, R. F., D. F. Heath, J. L. Lean, and G. J. Rottman, Differences in the temporal variations of solar UV flux, 10.7-cm solar radio flux, sunspot number, and Ca-K plage data caused by solar rotation and active region evolution, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 9883–9888, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, J. M., R. Gonzalez, F A. Marcos, D. Revelle, and H. Parish, Magnetic storm response of lower thermosphere density, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 2313–2320, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedin, A. E., A revised thermospheric model based on mass Spectrometer and incoherent scatter data: MSIS-83, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 10170–10188, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedin, A. E., MSIS-86 thermospheric model, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 4649–4662, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedin, A. E., Extension of the MSIS thermosphere model into the middle and lower atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 1159–1172, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacchia, L. G., J. W. Slowley, and I. G. Campbell, An analysis of the solar-activity effects in the upper atmosphere, Planet. Space Sci., 21, 1835–1842, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H.-D., E.-K. Kim, and H.-J. Choi, Orbit determination for the KOMPSAT-1 Spacecraft during the period of the solar maximum, KSAS International Journal, 6, 71–84, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K.-H., Y.-J. Moon, K.-S. Cho, H.-D. Kim, and J.-Y Park, Atmospheric drag effects on the KOMPSAT-1 satellite during geomagnetic superstorms, Earth Planets Space, 58, e25–e28, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, S. H., J. M. Picone, S. E. Thonnard, and A. C. Nicholas, The Effect of Atmospheric Drag on Satellite Orbits During the Bastille Day Event, Solar Physics, 204, 387–397, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen, H., E. Tanskanen, R. Pirjola, A. Pulkkinen, C. Dyer, D. Rodgers, P. Cannon, J.-C. Mandeville, and D. Boscher, Space weather effects catalogue, ESA Space Weather Study in pressed, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. and H. Lühr, Strong disturbance of the upper thermospheric density due to magnetic storms: CHAMP observations, J. Geophys. Res., 110, CiteID A09S29, doi:10.1029/2004JA010908, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., H. Lühr, V. Henize, and W. Köhler, Global distribution of the thermospheric total mass density derived from CHAMP, J. Geophys. Res., 110, CiteID A04301, doi:10.1029/2004JA010741, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcos, F A. and J. O. Wise, Towards a golden age of satellite drag, AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 40th, Reno, NV, Jan. 14-17, AIAA-2002-92, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcos, F A., M. J. Kendra, J. M. Griffen, J. N. Bass, D. R. Larson, and J. F Lui, Precision Low Earth Orbit Determination Using Atmospheric Density Calibration, Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, 97, 501–513, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck, O. and E. Gill, Satellite orbits: Models, methods, and applications, 83 pp., Springer Press., Berlin, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullan, D. J., Corotating interaction regions in stellar winds, Astrophysical Journal, 283, 303–312, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, A. C, J. M. Picone, S. E. Thonnard, R. R. Meier, K. F. Dymond, and D. P. Drob, A methodology for using optimal MSIS parameters retrieved from SSULI data to compute satellite drag on LEO objects, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 62, 1317–1326, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picone, J. M., A. E. Hedin, D. P. Drob, and A. C. Aikin, NRLMSISE-00 empirical model of the atmosphere: Statistical comparisons and scientific issues, J. Geophys. Res., 107, CiteID 1468, doi:10. 1029/2002JA009430, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobiska, W. K., E10.7 Use for Global Atmospheric Density Forecasting in 2001, AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Monterey, California, Aug. 5-8, AIAA-2002-4892, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Park.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, J., Moon, YJ., Kim, KH. et al. Comparison between the KOMPSAT-1 drag derived density and the MSISE model density during strong solar and/or geomagnetic activities. Earth Planet Sp 60, 601–606 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03353123

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03353123

Key words