Fig. 8From: Earthquake early warning for the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake: performance evaluation of the current system and the next-generation methods of the Japan Meteorological Agency a-1 Warning area and prediction result for the warning issuance by the IPF method for case No. 1. a-2 Final prediction result by the IPF method for case No. 1. b-1, 2 Warning areas and prediction results at the initial (b-1) and second (b-2) warning issuances by the PLUM method for case No. 1. The issuance times are considered to be the lower limits in this figure. b-3 Final prediction result by the PLUM method for case No. 1. Definitions of colors, shading, and symbols are the same as in Fig. 4 Back to article page