Skip to main content
Earth, Planets and Space
Fig. 6 | Earth, Planets and Space

Fig. 6

From: Simultaneous estimation of the dip angles and slip distribution on the faults of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake through a weak nonlinear inversion of InSAR data

Fig. 6

Comparison with the slip distribution of the one-fault model. a Slip distribution for the case of the one (Futagawa)-fault model. b, c Dip- and strike-slip components, respectively. The positive sign means normal (b) and right lateral (c) slip components. d, e Dip- and strike-slip components of the Futagawa fault (Fig. 4), respectively, for the case of the two-fault model. Vertical broken lines in d, e show the location of intersection with the Hinagu fault. The contour interval (solid line) is 50 cm with additional contours (broken line) of 25-cm interval for the negative slip

Back to article page