From: Identifying optimal tag-along station locations for improving VLBI Intensive sessions
Min \(\beta\) | (Lat, Lon) | Max \(\beta\) | (Lat, Lon) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
INT1, A | 0.61 | (39, 210) | 0.85 | (67, 312) |
INT1, B | 0.61 | (39, 210) | 0.87 | (37, 16) |
INT1, C | 0.61 | (39, 210) | 0.94 | (19, 4) |
INT2, A | 0.69 | (53, 170) | 0.93 | (59, 72) |
INT2, B | 0.69 | (49, 172) | 0.93 | (59, 72) |
INT2, C | 0.67 | (43, 186) | 0.97 | (21, 356) |
INT1 \(\cap\) INT2, A | 0.71 | (53, 170) | 0.86 | (67, 54) |
INT1 \(\cap\) INT2, B | 0.69 | (51, 184) | 0.87 | (37, 18) |
INT1 \(\cap\) INT2, C | 0.66 | (43, 204) | 0.94 | (19, 4) |