Earth, Planets and Space

Table 8 Model comparisons between the ETAS model with and without the triggering effect

From: Measuring seismicity diversity and anomalies using point process models: case studies before and after the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes in Kyushu, Japan

	μ	K ₀	C	Α	P	K _M7.3	c _M7.3	P _M7.3	ΔAIC
S2 ETAS	0.0231	1.440	0.00301	1.353	1.222	–	–	–	− 5.23
S2 Equation 2	0.0170	2.494	0.0196	1.586	1.301	0.130	0.153	1.391	− 5.23
S3 ETAS	0.00561	5.381	0.0257	4.187	1.573	–	–	–	+ 2.51
S3 Equation 2	0.00531	5.072	0.0251	3.031	1.244	1.04 × 10⁻⁴	0.380	1.520	+ 2.51

The MLEs of the reference ETAS model and the ETAS model with triggering effect (Eq. (2)) are listed with the AIC differences between the two models

Back to article page