Table 1 Contrast terrestrial heat flow and magnetic anomalies
No. | Name | Longitude (°E) | Latitude (°N) | qs (mW/m2) | ΔF/nT | CDP/km | Crustal thickness H/km | Velocity ratio Vp/Vs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tengchong | 98.48 | 25.03 | 118.0 | 14.0 | 23.6 | 35.7 | 1.81 |
2 | Kunming | 102.80 | 25.67 | 112.3 | 11.1 | 23.7 | 44.0 | 1.77 |
3 | Jianchuan | 99.83 | 26.43 | 98.5 | − 23.9 | 23.9 | 46.1 | 1.82 |
4 | Yanyuan | 101.17 | 27.33 | 89.3 | − 19.8 | 23.9 | 53.4 | 1.80 |
5 | Chuxiong | 100.20 | 25.57 | 82.9 | 8.1 | 24.5 | 41.8 | 1.75 |
6 | Dali | 100.33 | 25.65 | 103.4 | 15.6 | 24.7 | 42.5 | 1.74 |
7 | Miyi | 102.00 | 26.78 | 90.0 | − 3.2 | 24.7 | 49.1 | 1.71 |
8 | Eshan | 102.17 | 24.15 | 98.1 | − 23.3 | 24.9 | 38.9 | 1.71 |