From: Dynamic rupture simulation of 2018, Hokkaido Eastern Iburi earthquake: role of non-planar geometry
Model name | S1 axis | \(\varphi\) | Rake (Deg.) | Max slip (m) | Ruptured segment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Model 1 | N 51° E | 0.01 | 139 | 4.0 (Segment 2) | 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 |
 Model 2 | N 48° E | 0.01 | 141 | 3.0 (Segment 2) | 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 |
 Model 3 | N 45° E | 0.01 | 137 | 1.5 (Segment 3) | 3, 6 (,1,5) |
 Model 4 | N 51° E | 0.1 | 133 | 2.5 (Segment 3) | 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 |
 Model 5 | N 48° E | 0.1 | 133 | 1.9 (Segment 3) | 3, 5 (,1,2,6) |
 Model 6 | N 45° E | 0.1 | 131 | 1.5 (Segment 3) | 3 |
 Model 7 | N 51° E | 0.2 | 126 | 2.0 (Segment 3) | 3, 5 (, 1) |
 Model 8 | N 48° E | 0.2 | 125 | 1.5 (Segment 3) | 3 |
 Model 9 | N 45° E | 0.2 | 127 | 1.5 (Segment 3) | 3 |