Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Earth, Planets and Space

Fig. 3

From: Impact of crustal deformation detection by the DSI (difference of split-band interferograms) method with PALSAR-2 data: a case study on the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake

Fig. 3

Two-dimensional crustal deformation calculated from the slant-range changes for Paths 28 and 126. Thin lines depict the surface ruptures associated with the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake (Awata et al. 2019; National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology 2019). a Quasi-east–west (QEW) component of crustal deformation. The quasi-east direction is rotated 3 degrees clockwise from the east. The two boxes correspond to the areas of (d and g), respectively. Shaded areas show the caldera wall. b Quasi-up–down (QUD) component of crustal deformation. The quasi-up direction inclines 8 degrees northward from the vertical. The two boxes correspond to the areas in (e and h), respectively. c Topographic relief map. (d, e) Distribution of the QEW and QUD components, respectively, enlarged west of the Aso Caldera, corresponding to Fig. 1c. f Vertical displacement along the profile A–A' shown in (e). (g, h) Distribution of the QEW and QUD components, respectively, enlarged around the Futagawa Fault, corresponding to Fig. 1d

Back to article page