Skip to main content

Table 5 Absolute values of differences in phase of semiannual prograde and semiannual retrograde oscillation between GAO and HAM from CMIP6 (only the five models with the smallest differences are shown)

From: Preliminary study on hydrological angular momentum determined from CMIP6 historical simulations

Semiannual prograde phase

Semiannual retrograde phase

Model

Difference (°)

Model

Difference (°)

GISS-E2-1-G_historical_r10i1p3f1

25.96

GISS-E2-1-H_historical_r3i1p3f1

1.42

GISS-E2-1-G-CC_historical_r1i1p1f1

29.78

ACCESS-ESM1-5_historical_r2i1p1f1

1.93

GISS-E2-1-G_historical_r101i1p1f1

33.56

GISS-E2-1-G_historical_r3i1p1f1

2.50

GISS-E2-1-G_historical_r8i1p3f1

34.67

MIROC-ES2L_historical_r1i1p1f2

4.64

GISS-E2-1-G_historical_r8i1p1f2

35.62

GISS-E2-1-H_historical_r8i1p1f1

4.68

GRACE

5.68

GRACE

48.58

LSDM

26.84

LSDM

47.06

MEAN

100.32

MEAN

38.73

  1. The results obtained from GRACE, LSDM, and MEAN model are also shown