Spatio-temporal clustering of successive earthquakes as inferred from analyses of global CMT and NIED F-net catalogs

Earth, Planets and Space

Table 3 ETAS parameters evaluated in various regions by previous studies

Region	\({K}_{0}\)	C (days)	\(\alpha\)	\(\gamma\)	p	\(d\)(degree²)	\(q\)	\({M}_{i}\)	\({M}_{\text{c}}\)
Japan	\(0.988\times {10}^{-4}\)	\(0.840\times {10}^{-2}\)	1.962	1.326	0.910	\(0.203\times {10}^{-2}\)	1.570	8.4	4.5
	\(0.171\times {10}^{-4}\)	\(0.520\times {10}^{-2}\)	0.935	0.740	0.961	\(0.403\times {10}^{-3}\)	1.408	8.4	4.0
	\(0.290\times {10}^{-3}\)	\(0.748\times {10}^{-2}\)	1.154	0.891	0.911	\(0.552\times {10}^{-2}\)	1.524	8.4	5.0
California	\(0.51\)	\(0.004\)	1.27	\(1.31\)	\(1.09\)	\(1.868\times {10}^{-5}\)	\(1.59\)	7.5	3.5
China	\(0.2285\)	\(0.2663\)	\(1.7627\)	\(0.5587\)	\(1.2363\)	\(9.179\times {10}^{-4}\)	\(2.1249\)	7.9	4.0
China	0.0588	0.3049	2.3378	1.7503	1.1785	\(0.519\times {10}^{-4}\)	1.7864	7.9	4.0
Italy	\(4.7\times {10}^{-2}\)	\(0.012\)	\(1.2\)	\(0.36\)	\(1.11\)	\(5.662\times {10}^{-3}\)	\(1.57\)	6.3	2.5

Japan: Tohoku region, Western and Central Honshu, and all Japan from the top to the bottom (Ogata and Zhuang 2006) (Table 1, model 10)
California: southern California (Seif et al. 2017) (Table 2, sets 1)
China: Sichuan province (Guo et al. 2015) (Table 1, Model 3 and 4)
Italy: Central Italy (Lombardi 2016) (Table 1, INGV Bulletin)