Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of probabilities of the convective and dynamic instabilities

From: A statistical study of convective and dynamic instabilities in the polar upper mesosphere above Tromsø

Location

Tromsø (69.6° N, 19.2° E)

Albuquerquea (35° N, 106.5° W)

Mauib (20.7° N, 156.3° W)

Fort Collinsc (41° N, 105° W)

SJDCd (23.1° S, 45.9° W)

Height range

80–100 km

80–105 km

85–100 km

80–105 km

82–98 km

Season

Winter

All seasons

All seasons

All seasons

All seasonse

Solar cycle

Full

Middle

High

High

Low

Data

339 nights

3725 h

32 nights

195 h

19 nights

133 h

63 nights

390 h

79 nights

589 h

Resolutions

(a) 6 min/1 km

(b) 15 min/1 km

(c) 15 min/2 km

(d) 30 min/2 km

1.5 min/0.5 km

15 min/1 km

15 min/2 km

3 min/0.3 km

Probability of convective instability

(a) 8.7% (3.6%)

(b) 5.2% (3.1%)

(c) 1.3% (1.4%)

(d) 0.9% (1.1%)

8.0%

2.9%

0.9% (1.4% in winter)

3.1%

Data

210 nights

2059 h

32 nights

195 h

19 nights

133 h

63 nights

390 h

79 nights

589 h

Resolutions

Same above

24 min/1 km

Same above

Same above

30 min/2 km

Probability dynamic instability

(a) 10.0% (3.5%)

(b) 7.2% (3.1%)

(c) 1.4% (1.3%)

(d) 0.9% (1.1%)

7.5%

10.5%

4.4% (5.9% in winter)

17.5%

  1. aZhao et al. (2003)
  2. bLi et al. (2005)
  3. cSherman and She (2006)
  4. dAndrioli et al. (2017), SJDC stands for São José dos Campos
  5. eNo summer data. A standard deviation is shown in parenthesis for Tromsø data