The role of glacial isostatic adjustment in the present-day crustal motion and sea levels of East Asia

Earth, Planets and Space

Table 1 Comparisons between the uplift rates at the geodetic stations of East Asia predicted from GIA model RF3L20(β = 0.4)+ICE-4G and those from GPS measurements (Liu, 2004).

Station No.	Station name	Long. °E	Latt. °N	U^GIA mm/yr	mm/yr	mm/yr	mm/yr	mm/yr	U^GPS mm/yr	mm/yr	U′ mm/yr
1	Irkutsk	104.32	52.22	0.02	0.18	0.00	0.27	0.16	0.53	0.10	0.51
2	Hailaer	119.73	49.27	0.11	0.19	0.12	0.20	0.06	0.77	0.36	0.66
3	Suiyang	130.90	44.43	0.16	0.08	0.11	0.20	0.03	−1.96	0.30	−2.12
4	Urumqi	87.60	43.80	0.02	0.12	0.05	0.16	0.07	2.14	0.28	2.12
5	Changchun	125.44	43.79	0.17	0.14	0.18	0.23	0.04	1.70	0.27	1.53
6	Selezaschita	77.02	43.18	−0.01	0.10	0.03	0.11	0.07	−3.06	0.33	−3.05
7	Wushi	79.20	41.20	0.02	0.07	0.03	0.11	0.05	−3.31	0.25	−3.33
8	Dingxin	100.20	40.98	0.09	0.03	0.06	0.19	0.05	−2.06	0.23	−2.15
9	Shsanling	116.22	40.25	0.15	0.08	0.14	0.21	0.04	0.08	0.27	−0.07
10	Tashikuergan	75.23	37.77	0.03	0.00	0.00	0.08	0.03	−0.30	0.53	−0.33
11	Yanchi	107.43	37.77	0.15	0.04	0.10	0.22	0.04	−0.40	0.20	−0.55
12	Delingha	97.37	37.37	0.07	0.02	0.06	0.14	0.04	1.37	0.20	1.30
13	Xining	101.77	36.60	0.11	0.03	0.08	0.17	0.04	1.74	0.23	1.63
14	Taian	117.15	36.25	0.15	0.07	0.15	0.18	0.04	0.43	0.36	0.28
15	Usuda	138.36	36.13	0.05	−0.13	−0.08	0.02	0.03	−0.11	0.42	−0.16
16	Xian	108.98	34.17	0.15	0.06	0.13	0.19	0.04	−3.43	0.25	−3.58
17	Shao	121.20	31.02	−0.12	−0.16	−0.10	−0.15	0.04	−1.98	0.11	−1.86
18	Jiufeng	114.48	30.52	0.20	0.13	0.24	0.21	0.06	−2.68	0.28	−2.88
19	Lhasa	91.10	29.65	0.15	0.04	0.10	0.19	0.04	−2.52	0.10	−2.67
20	Luzhou	100.62	28.87	0.16	0.05	0.11	0.19	0.04	−1.07	0.34	−1.23
21	Kunming	102.87	25.02	0.13	0.07	0.15	0.13	0.04	−4.05	0.37	−4.18
22	Xiamen	118.08	24.45	−0.01	−0.14	−0.06	−0.04	0.04	−1.48	0.33	−1.47
23	Guangzhou	113.30	23.17	0.14	−0.02	0.07	0.14	0.04	−3.63	0.52	−3.77
24	Qiongzhong	109.82	19.02	−0.11	−0.18	−0.15	−0.13	0.02	−0.50	0.46	−0.39

Long./Latt.—longitude/latitude; —uplift rate/uncertainty from RF3L20(β=0.4)+ICE-4G model; —uplift rate/uncertainty from GPS measurement. —uplift rates from models RF3+ICE-4G, RF2+ICE-4G and RF3L20(β=0.4)+ICE-5G respectively; U′—uplift rate from GPS measurement with the GIA effect removed.