The role of glacial isostatic adjustment in the present-day crustal motion and sea levels of East Asia

Wang, Hansheng; Wu, Patrick; Jia, Lulu; Hu, Bo; Jiang, Liming

doi:10.5047/eps.2011.05.002

Earth, Planets and Space

Table 3 Comparisons between the present-day RSL rates at the Tide-Gauge stations of East Asia predicted from GIA model RF3L20(β=0.4)+ICE-4G and those from tide gauges (Ding, 2005; Wang et al., 2010).

From: The role of glacial isostatic adjustment in the present-day crustal motion and sea levels of East Asia

Sites	No.	Long. °E	Latt. °N	s^GIA mm/yr	mm/yr	mm/yr	mm/yr	mm/yr	s^TG mm/yr	s′ mm/yr
Wakkanai	1	141.68	45.42	−0.18	−0.21	−0.24	−0.18	0.02	2.9	3.08
Abashiri	2	144.28	44.02	−0.07	−0.09	−0.10	−0.04	0.01	1.63	1.7
Kushiro	3	144.38	42.97	−0.02	−0.06	−0.07	0.01	0.02	8.97	8.99
Hakodate	4	140.73	41.78	−0.11	−0.15	−0.18	−0.10	0.02	−0.14	−0.03
Huludao	5	121.00	40.72	−0.39	−0.32	−0.40	−0.46	0.05	0.68	1.07
Yingkou	6	122.15	40.63	−0.37	−0.32	−0.40	−0.44	0.05	1.8	2.17
Hachinohe	7	141.53	40.53	−0.11	−0.13	−0.16	−0.09	0.02	5.14	5.25
Qinghuangdao	8	119.62	39.92	−0.39	−0.32	−0.40	−0.46	0.05	−2.12	−1.73
0funato	9	141.75	39.02	−0.10	−0.12	−0.16	−0.08	0.02	5.23	5.33
Tanggu	10	117.72	39.00	−0.40	−0.31	−0.40	−0.46	0.05	2.3	2.7
Dalian	11	121.67	38.92	−0.32	−0.28	−0.35	−0.37	0.05	1.51	1.83
Lushun	12	121.25	38.80	−0.32	−0.28	−0.35	−0.37	0.05	5.38	5.7
Longkou	13	120.32	37.62	−0.32	−0.27	−0.35	−0.36	0.05	0.08	0.4
Yantai	14	121.38	37.55	−0.27	−0.24	−0.31	−0.31	0.04	0.12	0.39
Chengshantou	15	122.70	37.38	−0.22	−0.19	−0.25	−0.25	0.03	−1.19	−0.97
Yangjiaogou	16	118.87	37.27	−0.36	−0.29	−0.38	−0.41	0.05	3.35	3.71
Toyama	17	137.22	36.77	−0.33	−0.16	−0.23	−0.34	0.04	2.3	2.63
Yushankou	18	121.48	36.70	−0.23	−0.20	−0.26	−0.26	0.04	−2.18	−1.95
Qingdao	19	120.32	36.08	−0.27	−0.24	−0.32	−0.31	0.04	0.64	0.91
Shijiusuo	20	119.55	35.38	−0.30	−0.25	−0.33	−0.33	0.05	0.36	0.66
Mera	21	139.83	34.92	−0.20	−0.14	−0.21	−0.19	0.04	3.46	3.66
Hamada	22	132.07	34.90	0	0.01	−0.03	0.03	0.03	5.88	5.88
Lianyungang	23	119.42	34.75	−0.30	−0.25	−0.33	−0.32	0.05	−1.91	−1.61
Maisaka	24	137.62	34.68	−0.31	−0.15	−0.23	−0.32	0.04	−2.23	−1.92
Miyakejima	25	139.48	34.06	−0.14	−0.12	−0.19	−0.12	0.04	−3.7	−3.56
Kushimoto	26	135.78	33.47	−0.26	−0.11	−0.19	−0.26	0.04	2.24	2.5
Nagasaki	27	129.87	32.73	0.17	0.16	0.13	0.23	0.03	3.13	2.96
Hosojima	28	131.68	32.42	0.07	0.08	0.03	0.11	0.03	−0.57	−0.64
Lvsi	29	121.62	32.13	−0.09	−0.07	−0.13	−0.09	0.03	5.91	6
Aburatsu	30	131.42	31.57	0.09	0.10	0.05	0.13	0.03	1.13	1.04
Wusong	31	121.50	31.38	−0.13	−0.10	−0.16	−0.13	0.03	2.61	2.74
Dajishan	32	122.17	30.82	−0.05	−0.02	−0.08	−0.03	0.03	4.68	4.73
Luhuashan	33	122.60	30.82	−0.03	0	−0.06	−0.01	0.03	3.36	3.39
Nishinoomote	34	130.99	30.73	0.13	0.13	0.08	0.18	0.04	2.19	2.06
Changtu	35	122.30	30.25	−0.07	−0.04	−0.11	−0.06	0.03	2.09	2.16
Dinghai	36	122.07	30.00	−0.09	−0.05	−0.12	−0.07	0.03	3.74	3.83
Zhenhai	37	121.72	29.95	−0.09	−0.06	−0.13	−0.08	0.03	4.18	4.27
Dachen	38	121.90	28.45	−0.10	−0.05	−0.13	−0.08	0.04	2.92	3.02
Naze	39	129.50	28.38	0.13	0.16	0.11	0.19	0.04	2.44	2.31
Kanmen	40	121.28	28.08	−0.14	−0.08	−0.16	−0.13	0.04	1.59	1.73
Sansha	41	120.22	26.92	−0.22	−0.12	−0.21	−0.22	0.04	0.23	0.45
Naha	42	127.67	26.22	0.12	0.15	0.10	0.17	0.04	1.79	1.67
Pingtan	43	119.85	25.45	−0.24	−0.13	−0.22	−0.24	0.04	1.02	1.26
Jilong	44	121.75	25.15	0	0	−0.06	0.03	0.04	4.71	4.71
Xiamen	45	118.07	24.45	−0.28	−0.15	−0.24	−0.28	0.04	5.73	6.01
Ishigaki	46	124.15	24.33	0.16	0.13	0.08	0.22	0.04	1.84	1.68
Shantou	47	116.75	23.33	−0.30	−0.17	−0.26	−0.31	0.04	−1.19	−0.89
Huangpu	48	113.45	23.10	−0.40	−0.25	−0.34	−0.42	0.05	0.07	0.47
Shanwei	49	115.35	22.75	−0.28	−0.17	−0.25	−0.29	0.04	1.18	1.46
Gaoxiong	50	120.29	22.61	0.07	0.03	−0.02	0.11	0.03	4.49	4.42
Chiwan	51	113.87	22.47	−0.27	−0.18	−0.26	−0.28	0.04	0.25	0.52
Hongkong	52	114.20	22.30	−0.24	−0.17	−0.24	−0.25	0.04	1.24	1.48
Zhapo	53	111.83	21.58	−0.29	−0.20	−0.27	−0.30	0.04	1.69	1.98
Beihai	54	109.08	21.48	−0.32	−0.24	−0.31	−0.34	0.04	1.74	2.06
Weizhou	55	109.12	20.02	−0.24	−0.18	−0.24	−0.26	0.03	3.16	3.4
Haikou	56	110.28	20.02	−0.18	−0.13	−0.18	−0.19	0.02	6.85	7.03
Dongfang	57	108.62	19.10	−0.23	−0.16	−0.21	−0.25	0.03	2.88	3.11
Yulin	58	109.53	18.22	−0.12	−0.05	−0.08	−0.13	0.02	1.39	1.51
Average				−0.17				0.04	2.05	2.22

Long./Latt.−longitude/latitude; —RSL rate/uncertainty from RF3L20(β=0.4)+ICE-4G model; s^TG/s′—RSL rate before/after GIA correction. —RSL rates from models RF3+ICE-4G, RF2+ICE-4G and RF3L20(β=0.4)+ICE-5G, respectively.

Back to article page