Fig. 11

Inverted models for Case I and Case II. The left ((a)–(d)), center ((e)–(h)), and right ((i)–(l)) panels show the models for Case I (fourth iteration, RMS _d misfit = 0.95), Case II (fifth iteration, RMS _d misfit = 1.04), and Case II using the wrong treatment of the topography (tenth iteration, RMS _d misfit = 3.47), respectively. The panels in the top three rows ((a)–(c), (e)–(g), and (i)–(k)) are plan views at 15, 125, and 300 km depth, and the bottom panels ((d), (h), and (l)) are cross-section views cutting across the anomalous body at X = 0 km. The black dashed lines indicate the outline of the synthetic conductive anomaly. The solutions are shown only in the central part of the model domain.