Figure 1From: Some reasoning on the RELM-CSEP likelihood-based testsFraction of rejections. Application of CSEP/RELM LBT and the proposed testing procedure on simulated catalogs. (a) F R of daily CSEP N and L tests, for ETAS and NP simulations of Italian seismicity and M F = 2.5. (b) Comparison of F R values of testing procedure proposed here with those obtained by CSEP/RELM LBT, for ETAS simulations of Japanese seismicity (M F = 4.0), with a forecast time span of 3 months.Back to article page