Skip to main content

Geo-electrical structure of the mantle beneath the Indian region derived from the 27-day variation and its harmonics

Abstract

Estimates of the C-response function were determined by Z: H method to obtain conductivity and depth values for a substitute perfect conductor (conductosphere) beneath the Indian region, utilizing geomagnetic variations at periods of 27-day and its harmonics. Two and half years of continuous geomagnetic data were utilized. These data were recorded during 1975–77, at a chain of 13 stations confined to the 150° geomagnetic longitude band, which extended from the dip-equator at the southern tip of India, to the northern parts of Russia. Complex demodulation technique was employed to determine the electromagnetic (EM) responses. Taking advantage of the dense latitudinal distribution of the observatories, the demodulates of all the stations were tested statistically to check the validity of the P 01 approximation for the inducing field. Single-station response estimates, for a 27-day period, computed by a robust method have shown that reliable EM responses (consistent with P 01 source dependence and with local 1-D Earth structure) could be obtained for only 6 stations, all situated in the mid-latitude region. The depth estimates at all 6 stations are consistent, including Sabhawala (SAB) which is situated close to the Himalayan collision zone. The negligible differences in the depth estimates of these mid-latitude stations do not show any latitudinal dependence, as against such an observation reported for the European and the North American regions. The mean depth of the conductosphere is found to be 1200 (±200) km, with an average conductivity of 0.7 (±0.3) S/m. Comparison of the mean geo-electrical structure with those of other regional models shows that the presence of a mid-mantle conductor at 850 km depth could be considered to be a global phenomenon.

References

  1. Agarwal, A. K., B. P. Singh, and N. Nityananda, An application of complex demodulation techniquetogeomagnetic data and conductivity anomalies, Proc. Indian. Acad. Sci., 89, 67–77, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arora, B. R., Electromagnetic response and source field characterization from meridional chain of geomagnetic observatories, Abstract of XXII general Assembly of IUGG, Birmingham, UK, Abstracts volume of Week B, 324, 1999.

  3. Arora, B. R., W. H. Campbell, and E. R. Schiffmacher, Upper mantle electrical conductivity in the Himalayan region, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 47, 653–665, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banks, R. J., Geomagnetic variations and the electrical conductivity of the upper mantle, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 17, 457–487, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Banks, R.J., Complex demodulationof geomagnetic data and the estimation of transfer function, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 43, 87–101, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Banks, R. J. and A. N. Ainsworth, Global induction and the spatial structure of mid-latitude geomagnetic variations, Geophys. J. Int., 110, 251–266, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beamish, D. and R. J. Banks, Geomagnetic variations anomalies in northern England: Processing and presentation of data from a non-simultaneous array, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 75, 513–539, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chandrasekhar, E. and B. R. Arora, Upper mantle electrical conductivity distribution beneath Indian subcontinent using geomagnetic storm time variations., Mem. Geol. Soc. India, 24, 149–157, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chandrasekhar, E. and B. R. Arora, On the source field geometry and geomagnetic induction in southern India, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 46, 815–825, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chandrasekhar, E. and B.R. Arora, Complex demodulation and electromagnetic response function for geomagnetic field variations at 27-day and its harmonics, J. Assoc. Explr. Geophys., XVII, 91–98, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chapman, S.and A.T. Price, The electrical and magnetic state of the interior of the Earth as inferred from terrestrial magnetic variations, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., A-229, 427–460, 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, P. F. and P. C. W. Fung, Electromagnetic response function for the period of 27-day in Chinese region, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 43, 979–987, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Egbert, G. D. and J. R. Booker, Very long period magnetotellurics at Tucson observatory: Implications for mantle conductivity, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 15099–15115, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Honkura, Y. and M. Matsushima, Electromagnetic response of the mantle to long-period geomagnetic variations over the globe, Earth Planets Space, 50, 651–662, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawakatsu, H. and F. Niu, Seismic evidence for a 920-km discontinuity in the mantle, Nature, 371, 301–305, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lilley, F. E. M. and M. N. Sloane, On estimating electrical conductivity using gradient data from magnetometer arrays, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 28, 321–328, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nityananda, N., A. K. Agarwal, and B. P. Singh, An explanation of induced magnetic variations at Sabhawala, India, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 25, 226–231, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Olsen, N., The electrical conductivity of the mantle beneath Europe derived from C-responses from3 to 720 hr., Geophys. J. Int., 133, 298–308, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Omura, K., Change of electrical conductivity of olivine associated with olivine-spinel transition, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 65, 292–307, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pecova, J., K. Pec, and O. Praus, Remarks on spatial distribution of long period variations in the geomagnetic field over European area, in Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth and Moon, edited by U. Schmucker, pp. 171–186, Academic Publication, Japan, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Petersons, H. F. and R. S. Anderssen, On the spherical symmetry of the Electrical conductivity of the Earth’s mantle, J. Geomag. Geoelectr, 42, 1309–1324, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roberts, R. G., The deep electrical structure of the Earth, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 85, 583–600, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmucker, U., A spherical harmonic analysis of solar daily variations in the years 1964—1965: response estimates and source fields for global induction—II. Results, Geophys. J. Int., 136, 455–476, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schultz, A. and J. C. Larsen, Analysis of zonal field morphology and data quality for a global set of magnetic observatory daily mean values, J. Geomag. Geoelectr, 35, 835–846, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schultz, A. and J. C. Larsen, On the electrical conductivity of the mid-mantle: I. Calculation of equivalent scalar magnetotelluric response functions, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 88, 733–761, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schultz, A., R. D. Kurtz, A. D. Chave, and A. G. Jones, Conductivity discontinuities in the upper mantle beneath a stable craton, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 2941–2944, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Semenov, V. Yu., A. Adam, M. Hvozdara, and V. Wesztergom, Geoelectrical structure of the Earth’s mantle in Pannonian basin, Acta Geod. Geoph. Mont. Hung., 32(1–2), 151–168, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Weidelt, P., The inverse problem of geomagnetic induction, J. Geophys., 38, 257–289, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Whittal, K. P. and D. W. Oldenburg, Inversion of magnetotelluric data for a one dimensional conductivity, in Geophys. Monogr. Ser, Soc. of Explr. Geophys., edited by D. V. Fitterman, 5, 1–114, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Chandrasekhar.

Additional information

On leave from Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Colaba, Mumbai-5, India.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chandrasekhar, E. Geo-electrical structure of the mantle beneath the Indian region derived from the 27-day variation and its harmonics. Earth Planet Sp 52, 587–594 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03351667

Download citation

Keywords

  • Indian Region
  • Depth Estimate
  • Pannonian Basin
  • Geomagnetic Variation
  • Period Band