Skip to main content

Advertisement

We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.

Gravity inversion modeling across a 2-D dike-like structure—A Case Study

Abstract

Gravity investigations do have certain known limitations, the two most prominent perhaps being deep resolution and the non-uniqueness of the solution. We utilized the principle of the physical geometry a two-dimensional dike in the inversion process across tectonic line in the Chubu District, Honshu—in the Japan Alps. The location is probably where the Tsunan-Matsumoto tectonic line interacts with the Itoigawa-Shizuoka Tectonic Line (ISTL). Two-dimensional modeling results consistent with previous works on gravity and reflection and/or refraction prospecting are given to depict the probable sub-surface structure. We conclude that the Bouguer gravity anomaly low to the Southwest or Western side of the tectonic trace is due to thrust of lower density sedimentary rocks deeper into the higher density lower crust to a depth range of approximately 3.54.0 km below the Earth surface.

References

  1. Ando, M., Possibility of a major earthquake in the Tokai District, Japan and its pre-estimated seismo-tectonic effects, Tectonophys., 25, 69–85, 1975.

  2. Barbosa, V. C. F., J. B. C. Silva, and W. E. Medeiros, Gravity inversion of basement relief using approximate equality constraints on depths, Geophysics, 62, 1745–1757, 1997.

  3. Blakely, R. J., Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications, The Cambridge University Press, 1996.

  4. Burger, H. R., Exploration Geophysics of the Shallow Subsurface, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632, 1992.

  5. Butler, D. K., Generalized gravity gradient inversion for 2-D inversion, Geophysics, 60(4), 1018–1028, 1995.

  6. Geldart, L. P., E. D. Gill, and B. Sharma, Gravity anomalies of two-dimensional faults, Geophysics, 31(2), 372–397, 1966.

  7. Hirokawa, O., Geological Map of Japan, 1:1,000,000 (2nd Edition), Geological Survey of Japan, 1978.

  8. Ikami, A., T. Yoshii, S. Kubota, Y. Sasaki, A. Hasemi, T. Moriya, H. Miyamachi, R. S. Matsu’ura, and K. Wada, A Seismic-refraction Profile in and around Nagano Prefecture, Central Japan, J. Phys. Earth, 34, 457–474, 1986.

  9. Medeiros, W. E. and J. B. C. Silva, Geophysical inversion using approximate equality constraints, Geophysics, 61, 1678–1688, 1996.

  10. Nelder, J. A. and R. Mead, A simplex method for function minimization, Computer J., 7, 308–313, 1965.

  11. Nowell, D. A. G., Gravity terrain corrections—An Overview, J. Appl. Geophys., 42, 117–134, 1999.

  12. Parasnis, D. S., Principles of Applied Geophysics, Chapman & Hall, 1997.

  13. Parker, R. L., Best bounds on density and depth from gravity data, Geophysics, 34, 315–334, 1974.

  14. Paviani, M. R. and D. M. Himmelblau, Constrained nonlinear optimization by Heuristic Programming, Journal of Operations Research Society of America (ORSA), 17, 872, 1969.

  15. Rao, D. B., Modeling of sedimentary basins from gravity anomalies with variable density contrast, Geophys. J. Roy. Australian Soc., 84, 207–212, 1986.

  16. Telford, W. M., L. P. Geldart, and R. E. Sheriff, Applied Geophysics. 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1990.

  17. Wessel, P. and W. H. F. Smith, The Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) Version 3.0 Technical Reference and Cookbook, SOEST/NOAA, 1995.

  18. Yamamoto, A., K. Nozaki, Y. Fukao, H. Furumoto, R. Shichi, and T. Ezaka, Gravity survey in the Central Ranges, Honshu Japan, J. Phys. Earth, 30, 201–243, 1982.

  19. Zhang, J., B. Zhong, X. Zhou, and Y Dai, Gravity anomalies of 2-D bodies with variable density contrast, Geophysics, 66(3), 809–813, 2001.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. L. Ateya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ateya, I.L., Takemoto, S. Gravity inversion modeling across a 2-D dike-like structure—A Case Study. Earth Planet Sp 54, 791–796 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03351732

Download citation

Keywords

  • Gravity Anomaly
  • Inversion Modeling
  • Terrain Correction
  • Tectonic Line
  • Gravity Inversion