- Open Access
Auroral electrojet oval
Earth, Planets and Space volume 55, pages 255–261 (2003)
The auroral electrojet is enhanced in the polar ionosphere associated with charged particle precipitation and field-aligned currents during substorms. In this paper the geometry of the elctrojet is determined by using the ionospheric equivalent current systems for every 5 minutes during March 18 and 19, 1978. The latitudinal and local time shifts of the oval are examined. Possible relationship of the electrojet oval with expansion of the auroral oval and the field-aligned current belts during substorms are discussed. The electrojet oval in the polar region consists of westward and eastward electrojets, varying with AE index. As the magnetic activity increases, the westward electrojet has distinct latitudinal shifts in different local time sectors: it shifts poleward around the midnight (23:00-03:00 MLT), while moves equatorward in the morning sector (03:00-10:00 MLT) and afternoon sector (20:00-23:00 MLT. The eastward electrojet includes two insulated parts: a higher-latitude part around 80° latitude in the nighttime sector (21:00-03:00 MLT) and a lower-latitude part between 60°–70° latitudes in other local time sectors. As AE index increases, the higher-latitude part of the eastward electrojet expands eastward from 03:00 to 08:00 MLT, while the lower-latitude part shows a equatorward shift in the afternoon sector, which is more or less similar to the westward electrojet.
Akasofu, S.-I., Magnetospheric substorms: A model, in Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Part 3, edited by E. R. Dyer, 131 pp., D. Reidel, Norwell, Mass., 1972.
Akasofu, S.-I., B. H. Ahn, Y. Kamide, and J. H. Allen, A note on the accuracy of the auroral electrojet indices, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 5769–5772, 1983.
Atkinson, G. J., An approximate flow equation for geomagnetic flux tubes and its application to polar substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 72, 5373–5382, 1967.
Feldstein, Y. I., A. Grafe, L. I. Gromova, and V. A. Popov, Auroral electrojets during geomagnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 14223–14235, 1997.
Greenwald, R. A., K. B. Baker, J. R. Dudeney, M. Pinnock, T. B. Jones, E. C. Thomas, J.-P. Villain, J.-C. Cerisier, C. Senior, C. Hanuise, R. D. Hunsucker, G. Sofko, J. Koehler, E. Nielsen, R. Pellinen, A. D. M. Walker, N. Sato, and H. Yamagishi, DARN/SuperDARN, Space Sci. Rev., 71(1-4), 761–791, 1995.
Iijima, T. and T. A. Potemra, The amplitude distribution of field-aligned currents at northern high latitudes observed by Triad, J. Geophys. Res., 81, 2165–2174, 1976a.
Iijima, T. and T. A. Potemra, Field-aligned currents in the dayside cusp observed by Triad, J. Geophys. Res., 81, 5971–5979, 1976b.
Iijima, T. and T. A. Potemra, Large-scale characteristics of field-aligned currents associated with substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 599–615, 1978.
Kamide, Y., Electrodynamic processes, in The Earth’s Ionosphere and Magnetosphere, Kyoto Sangyo University Press, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 156–189, 1988.
Kamide, Y. and S.-I. Akasofu, Latitudinal cross section of the auroral electrojet and its relation to the interplanetary magnetic field polarity, J. Geo-phys. Res., 79, 3755–3771, 1974.
Kamide, Y. and S.-I. Akasofu, Notes on the auroral electrojet indices, Rev. Geophys., 21, 1647–1665, 1983.
Kamide, Y. and S. Matsushita, Simulation studies of ionospheric electric fields and currents in relation to field-aligned currents, 1. Quiet periods, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 4083–4098, 1979a.
Kamide, Y. and S. Matsushita, Simulation studies of ionospheric electric fields and currents in relation to field-aligned currents, 2. Substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 4099–4115, 1979b.
Kamide, Y., et al., Global distribution of ionospheric and field-aligned currents during substorm as determined from six IMS meridian chains of magnetometers: initial results, J. Geophys. Res., 87, 8228–8240, 1982a.
Kamide, Y., et al., Changes in the global electric fields and currents for March 17–19, 1978 from six IMS meridian chains of magnetometers, Rep. UAG-87, World Data Center A, Boulder, Colo., 1982b.
Lu, G., et al., Interhemispheric asymmetry of the high-latitude ionospheric convection pattern, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 6491–6510, 1994.
Lui, A. T. Y., Current controversies in magnetospheric physics, Rev. Geophys., 39, 535–563, 2001.
Matsushita, S. and W.-Y. Xu, Equivalent ionospheric current systems representing solar daily variations of the polar geomagnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 87, 8241–8254, 1982.
McPherron, R. L., C. T. Russell, and M. P. Aubry, Satellite studies of magnetospheric substorm on August 15, 1968, 9. Phenomenological model for substorm, J. Geophys. Res., 78, 3131–3149, 1973.
Newell, P. T., The role of the ionosphere in aurora and space weather, Rev. Geophys., 39, 137–149, 2001.
Richmond, A. D., Assimilative mapping of ionospheric electrodynamics, Adv. Space Res., 12, 59–68, 1992.
Sun, W., W.-Y. Xu, and S.-I. Akasofu, Mathematical separation of directly driven and unloading components in the ionospheric equivalent currents during substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 11695–11700, 1998.
Sun, W., W.-Y. Xu, and S.-I. Akasofu, An improved method to deduce the unloading component for magnetospheric substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 13131–13140, 2000.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, GX., Xu, WY., Wei, ZG. et al. Auroral electrojet oval. Earth Planet Sp 55, 255–261 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03351757
- Auroral electrojet
- AE index