Special Issue: Modelling the Earth’s Magnetic Field: the 10th Generation IGRF
- Article
- Open access
- Published:
Evaluation of candidate geomagnetic field models for the 10th generation of IGRF
Earth, Planets and Space volume 57, pages 1173–1181 (2005)
Abstract
The recent satellite magnetic missions, combined with high quality ground observatory measurements, have provided excellent data for main field modelling. Four different groups submitted seven main-field and eight secular-variation candidate models for IGRF-10. These candidate models were evaluated using several different strategies. Comparing models with independent data was found to be difficult. Valuable information was gained by mapping model differences, computing root mean square differences between all pairs of models and between models and the common mean, and by studying power spectra and azimuthal distributions of coefficient power. The resulting adopted IGRF main-field model for 2005.0, an average of three selected candidate models, is estimated to have a formal root mean square error over the Earth’s surface of only 5 nT, though it is likely that the actual error is somewhat larger than this. Due to the inherent uncertainty in secular variation forecasts, the corresponding error of the adopted secular-variation model for 2005.0–2010.0, an average of four selected candidate models, is estimated at 20 nT/a.
References
Golovkov, V. P., T. I. Zvereva, and T. A. Chernova, The IZMIRAN main magnetic field candidate model for IGRF-10, produced by a spherical harmonic-Natural orthogonal component method, Earth Planets Space, 57, this issue, 1165–1171, 2005.
Lesur, V., S. Macmillan, and A. Thomson, The BGS magnetic field candidate models for the 10th generation IGRF, Earth Planets Space, 57, this issue, 1157–1163, 2005.
Lowes, F. J., Mean-square values on sphere of spherical harmonic vector fields, J. Geophys. Res., 71(8), 2179, 1966.
Lowes, F. J. and N. Olsen, A more realistic estimate of the variances and systematic errors in spherical harmonic geomagnetic field models, Geophys. J. Int., 157(3), 1027–1044, 2004.
Mandea, M., E. Bellanger, and J.-L. Le Mouël, A geomagnetic jerk for the end of the 20th century?, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 183, 369–373, 2000.
Maus, S., S. McLean, D. Dater, H. Lühr, M. Rother, W. Mai, and S. Choi, NGDC/GFZ candidate models for the 10th generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field, Earth Planets Space, 57, this issue, 1151–1156, 2005.
Olsen, N., F. Lowes, and T. J. Sabaka, Ionospheric and induced field leakage in geomagnetic field models, and derivation of candidate models for DGRF 1995 and DGRF 2000, Earth Planets Space, 57, this issue, 1191–1196, 2005.
Olsen, N., T. J. Sabaka, and F. Lowes, New parameterization of external and induced fields in geomagnetic field modeling, and a candidate model for IGRF 2005, Earth Planets Space, 57, this issue, 1141–1149, 2005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Maus, S., Macmillan, S., Lowes, F. et al. Evaluation of candidate geomagnetic field models for the 10th generation of IGRF. Earth Planet Sp 57, 1173–1181 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03351901
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03351901