Skip to main content

Volume 57 Supplement 12

Special Issue: Modelling the Earth’s Magnetic Field: the 10th Generation IGRF

Magnetic field modelling from scalar-only data: Resolving the Backus effect with the equatorial electrojet

Abstract

It is well known that models of the global geomagnetic field constructed from only measurements of the field intensity suffer from large errors arising from the Backus or perpendicular error effect. Knowledge of the location of the magnetic dip equator is in principal sufficient to eliminate this error. We investigate constraining the location of the dip equator using observations of the equatorial electrojet in intensity measurements made from the CHAMP satellite. While the models generated are inferior compared with models obtained from oriented three-component vector data, they may be of sufficient quality to allow construction of future global geomagnetic reference models in the absence of vector data.

References

  • Backus, G. E., Non-uniqueness of the external geomagnetic field determined by surface intensity measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 6337–6341, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barraclough, D. R. and C. E. Nevitt, The effect of observational errors on geomagnetic field models based solely on total-intensity measurements, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 13, 123–131, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. E., International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the seventh generation, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 49, 123–248, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. E., R. T. Baldwin, D. R. Barraclough, S. Bushati, M. Chiappini, Y. Cohen, R. Coleman, G. Hulot, P. Kotze, V. P. Golovkov, A. Jackson, R. A. Langel, F. J. Lowes, D. J. McKnight, S. Macmillan, L. R. Newitt, N. W. Peddie, J. M. Quinn, and T. J. Sabaka, International Geomagnetic Reference Field, 1995 edition, Geophys. J. Int., 125, 318–321, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benkova, N. P., S. S. Dologinov, L. O. Tyurmina, and T. N. Cherevko, Comparison between the two satellite models, Izmiran and POGO, in World Magnetic Survey, 1957–1969, edited by A. J. Zmuda, vol. 28 of Bull. Int. Ass. Geomagn. Aeron., Paris, pp. 158–163, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, J. C. and R. A. Langel, The geomagnetic survey by the polar orbiting geophysical observatories OGO-2 and OGO-4, 1965–1967, in World Magnetic Survey, 1957–1969, edited by A. J. Zmuda, vol. 28 of Bull. Int. Ass. Geomagn. Aeron., Paris, pp. 65–75, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubbins, D. and J. Bloxham, Geomagnetic field analysis—III. Magnetic fields on the core-mantle boundary, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 80, 695–713, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holme, R. and N. Olsen, The spectrum of the magnetic secular variation, in Earth Observation with CHAMP—Results from Three Years in Orbit, edited by C. Reigber, H. Lühr, P. Schwintzer, and J. Wickert, pp. 329–334, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwitz, L. and D. G. Knapp, Inherent vector discrepancies in geomagnetic field models based on scalar F, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 3009–3013, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jadhav, G., M. Rajaram, and R. Rajaram, A detailed study of equatorial electrojet phenomenon using Ørsted satellite observations, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 10.1029/2001JA000183, 2002.

  • James, M. A., The Equatorial Electrojet: The Possible Implications of Locating it for Geomagnetic Field Modelling, Bachellors Thesis (unpublished), University of Liverpool, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khokhlov, A., G. Hulot, and J.-L. Le Mouel, On the Backus effect—1, Geophys. J. Int., 130, 701–703, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langel, R. A., Near-Earth magnetic disturbance in total field at high latitudes 1. Summary of data from OGO 2, 4 and 6, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 2363–2371, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowes, F. J., Spatial power spectrum of the main geomagnetic field, and extrapolation to the core, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 36, 717–730, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowes, F. J., Vector errors in spherical harmonic analysis of scalar data, Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc., 42, 637–651, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowes, F. J. and J. E. Martin, Optimum use of satellite intensity and vector data in modelling the main geomagnetic field, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 48, 183–192, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lühr, H., S. Maus, and M. Rother, Noon-time equatorial electrojet: its spatial features as determined by the CHAMP satellite, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 10.1029/2002JA009656, 2004.

  • Macmillan, S., S. Maus, T. Bondar, A. Chambodut, V. Golovkov, R. Holme, B. Langlais, V. Lesur, F. Lowes, H. Lühr, W. Mai, M. Mandea, N. Olsen, M. Rother, T. Sabaka, A. Thomson, and I. Wardinski, The 9th-generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field, Geophys. J. Int., 155, 1051–1056, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandea, M. and S. Macmillan, International Geomagnetic Reference Field—the eighth generation, Earth Planets Space, 52, 1119–1124, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauersberger, P., Das Mittel der Energiedichte des geomagnetischen Hauptfeldes an der Erdoberfläche and seine säkulare Änderung, Gerlands Bietr. Geophys., 65, 207–215, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maus, S., M. Rother, R. Holme, H. Lühr, N. Olsen, and V. Haak, First scalar magnetic anomaly map from CHAMP satellite data indicates weak lithospheric field, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 10.1029/2001GL013685, 2002.

  • Neubert, T., M. Mandea, G. Hulot, R. Von Frese, F. Primdahl, J. L. Jorgensen, E. Friis-Christensen, P. Stauning, N. Olsen, and T. Risbo, Ørsted satellite captures high-precision geomagnetic field data, Eos Trans. AGU, 82, 81–88, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, N., T. J. Sabaka, and L. Tøffner-Clausen, Determination of the IGRF 2000 model, Earth Planets Space, 52, 1175–1182, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, N., L. Tøffner-Clausen, T. J. Sabaka, P. Brauer, J. M. G. Merayo, J. L. Jørgensen, J.-M. Léger, O. V. Nielsen, F. Primdahl, and T. Risbo, Calibration of the Ørsted vector magnetometer, Earth Planets Space, 55, 11–18, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwumechili, C. A., The Equatorial Electrojet, Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigber, C., H. Lühr, and P. Schwintzer, Champ mission status, Adv. Space Res., 30, 129–134, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. P. and J. H. Bredekamp, Error enhancement in geomagnetic models derived from scalar data, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 1776–1782, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. P., R. A. Langel, and G. D. Mead, Backus effect observed by MAGSAT, Geophys. Res. Lett., 7, 941–944, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ultré-Guérard, P. and J. Achache, Error analysis of total field models derived from POGS data, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 49, 453–467, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ultré-Guérard, P., M. Hamoudi, and G. Hulot, Reducing the Backus effect given some knowledge of the dipequator, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 3201–3204, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorhies, C. V., J. Santana, and T. Sabaka, Backus effect and perpendicular errors in harmonic models of real vs. Synthetic data, IUGG 99 Abstracts, pp. B.388–B.389, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessel, P. and W. H. F. Smith, New, improved version of the generic mapping tools released, Eos Trans. AGU, 79, 579, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Holme.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holme, R., James, M.A. & Lühr, H. Magnetic field modelling from scalar-only data: Resolving the Backus effect with the equatorial electrojet. Earth Planet Sp 57, 1203–1209 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03351905

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03351905

Key words

  • Geomagnetic field modelling
  • equatorial electrojet
  • Backus effect