Special Issue: Modelling the Earth’s Magnetic Field: the 10th Generation IGRF
- Article
- Open access
- Published:
Magnetic field modelling from scalar-only data: Resolving the Backus effect with the equatorial electrojet
Earth, Planets and Space volume 57, pages 1203–1209 (2005)
Abstract
It is well known that models of the global geomagnetic field constructed from only measurements of the field intensity suffer from large errors arising from the Backus or perpendicular error effect. Knowledge of the location of the magnetic dip equator is in principal sufficient to eliminate this error. We investigate constraining the location of the dip equator using observations of the equatorial electrojet in intensity measurements made from the CHAMP satellite. While the models generated are inferior compared with models obtained from oriented three-component vector data, they may be of sufficient quality to allow construction of future global geomagnetic reference models in the absence of vector data.
References
Backus, G. E., Non-uniqueness of the external geomagnetic field determined by surface intensity measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 6337–6341, 1970.
Barraclough, D. R. and C. E. Nevitt, The effect of observational errors on geomagnetic field models based solely on total-intensity measurements, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 13, 123–131, 1976.
Barton, C. E., International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the seventh generation, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 49, 123–248, 1997.
Barton, C. E., R. T. Baldwin, D. R. Barraclough, S. Bushati, M. Chiappini, Y. Cohen, R. Coleman, G. Hulot, P. Kotze, V. P. Golovkov, A. Jackson, R. A. Langel, F. J. Lowes, D. J. McKnight, S. Macmillan, L. R. Newitt, N. W. Peddie, J. M. Quinn, and T. J. Sabaka, International Geomagnetic Reference Field, 1995 edition, Geophys. J. Int., 125, 318–321, 1996.
Benkova, N. P., S. S. Dologinov, L. O. Tyurmina, and T. N. Cherevko, Comparison between the two satellite models, Izmiran and POGO, in World Magnetic Survey, 1957–1969, edited by A. J. Zmuda, vol. 28 of Bull. Int. Ass. Geomagn. Aeron., Paris, pp. 158–163, 1971.
Cain, J. C. and R. A. Langel, The geomagnetic survey by the polar orbiting geophysical observatories OGO-2 and OGO-4, 1965–1967, in World Magnetic Survey, 1957–1969, edited by A. J. Zmuda, vol. 28 of Bull. Int. Ass. Geomagn. Aeron., Paris, pp. 65–75, 1971.
Gubbins, D. and J. Bloxham, Geomagnetic field analysis—III. Magnetic fields on the core-mantle boundary, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 80, 695–713, 1985.
Holme, R. and N. Olsen, The spectrum of the magnetic secular variation, in Earth Observation with CHAMP—Results from Three Years in Orbit, edited by C. Reigber, H. Lühr, P. Schwintzer, and J. Wickert, pp. 329–334, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2004.
Hurwitz, L. and D. G. Knapp, Inherent vector discrepancies in geomagnetic field models based on scalar F, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 3009–3013, 1974.
Jadhav, G., M. Rajaram, and R. Rajaram, A detailed study of equatorial electrojet phenomenon using Ørsted satellite observations, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 10.1029/2001JA000183, 2002.
James, M. A., The Equatorial Electrojet: The Possible Implications of Locating it for Geomagnetic Field Modelling, Bachellors Thesis (unpublished), University of Liverpool, 2004.
Khokhlov, A., G. Hulot, and J.-L. Le Mouel, On the Backus effect—1, Geophys. J. Int., 130, 701–703, 1997.
Langel, R. A., Near-Earth magnetic disturbance in total field at high latitudes 1. Summary of data from OGO 2, 4 and 6, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 2363–2371, 1974.
Lowes, F. J., Spatial power spectrum of the main geomagnetic field, and extrapolation to the core, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 36, 717–730, 1974.
Lowes, F. J., Vector errors in spherical harmonic analysis of scalar data, Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc., 42, 637–651, 1975.
Lowes, F. J. and J. E. Martin, Optimum use of satellite intensity and vector data in modelling the main geomagnetic field, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 48, 183–192, 1987.
Lühr, H., S. Maus, and M. Rother, Noon-time equatorial electrojet: its spatial features as determined by the CHAMP satellite, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 10.1029/2002JA009656, 2004.
Macmillan, S., S. Maus, T. Bondar, A. Chambodut, V. Golovkov, R. Holme, B. Langlais, V. Lesur, F. Lowes, H. Lühr, W. Mai, M. Mandea, N. Olsen, M. Rother, T. Sabaka, A. Thomson, and I. Wardinski, The 9th-generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field, Geophys. J. Int., 155, 1051–1056, 2003.
Mandea, M. and S. Macmillan, International Geomagnetic Reference Field—the eighth generation, Earth Planets Space, 52, 1119–1124, 2000.
Mauersberger, P., Das Mittel der Energiedichte des geomagnetischen Hauptfeldes an der Erdoberfläche and seine säkulare Änderung, Gerlands Bietr. Geophys., 65, 207–215, 1956.
Maus, S., M. Rother, R. Holme, H. Lühr, N. Olsen, and V. Haak, First scalar magnetic anomaly map from CHAMP satellite data indicates weak lithospheric field, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 10.1029/2001GL013685, 2002.
Neubert, T., M. Mandea, G. Hulot, R. Von Frese, F. Primdahl, J. L. Jorgensen, E. Friis-Christensen, P. Stauning, N. Olsen, and T. Risbo, Ørsted satellite captures high-precision geomagnetic field data, Eos Trans. AGU, 82, 81–88, 2001.
Olsen, N., T. J. Sabaka, and L. Tøffner-Clausen, Determination of the IGRF 2000 model, Earth Planets Space, 52, 1175–1182, 2000.
Olsen, N., L. Tøffner-Clausen, T. J. Sabaka, P. Brauer, J. M. G. Merayo, J. L. Jørgensen, J.-M. Léger, O. V. Nielsen, F. Primdahl, and T. Risbo, Calibration of the Ørsted vector magnetometer, Earth Planets Space, 55, 11–18, 2003.
Onwumechili, C. A., The Equatorial Electrojet, Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam, 1997.
Reigber, C., H. Lühr, and P. Schwintzer, Champ mission status, Adv. Space Res., 30, 129–134, 2002.
Stern, D. P. and J. H. Bredekamp, Error enhancement in geomagnetic models derived from scalar data, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 1776–1782, 1975.
Stern, D. P., R. A. Langel, and G. D. Mead, Backus effect observed by MAGSAT, Geophys. Res. Lett., 7, 941–944, 1980.
Ultré-Guérard, P. and J. Achache, Error analysis of total field models derived from POGS data, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 49, 453–467, 1997.
Ultré-Guérard, P., M. Hamoudi, and G. Hulot, Reducing the Backus effect given some knowledge of the dipequator, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 3201–3204, 1998.
Voorhies, C. V., J. Santana, and T. Sabaka, Backus effect and perpendicular errors in harmonic models of real vs. Synthetic data, IUGG 99 Abstracts, pp. B.388–B.389, 1999.
Wessel, P. and W. H. F. Smith, New, improved version of the generic mapping tools released, Eos Trans. AGU, 79, 579, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Holme, R., James, M.A. & Lühr, H. Magnetic field modelling from scalar-only data: Resolving the Backus effect with the equatorial electrojet. Earth Planet Sp 57, 1203–1209 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03351905
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03351905