- Open Access
A study of the storm event on October 21–22, 1999 by the MHD simulation
Earth, Planets and Space volume 58, pages633–643(2006)
We carried out a high resolution three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation of the interaction between the solar wind and the Earth’s magnetosphere during a strong magnetic storm on October 21–22, 1999. The input to the simulation was from WIND solar wind observations. As the IMF is strongly southward (−20 nT to −30 nT) for 6 hours, the geomagnetic field lines in the dayside magnetopause are eroded to the geosynchronous orbit (GEO) region by reconnection. The associated magnetic flux is transferred from the dayside magnetosphere to the tail. The reconnection region still appears near GEO region on the dayside magnetopause, even though the IMF Bz component becomes small or northward, because of the influence of the strong IMF By (30 nT). IMF lines can successively reconnect with the naked and large geomagnetic field line in the dayside flank regions. Thus, the cross polar cap potential is maintained to be large value and convection in the ionosphere is enhanced. The cross polar cap potential is governed by IMF By as well as Bz (ф ≈250 kV for Bz ≈ −20 nT and ф ≈ 300 kV for Bz ≈ − 30 nT), and it saturates during the strong southward IMF. A large energy flux enters the ionosphere at very low latitudes (50°) and the inner edge of the plasma sheet becomes very close to the Earth X = −3.2 RE for a strong magnetic storms. The open-closed boundary extends to 60° latitudes on the nightside, 72° on the dayside, 62° on dawn, and 66° on dusk. Enhanced energy flux appears at low latitudes (50°) on the nightside in simulation. Moreover, the energy flux in the dusk region (19 MLT) appears down to 55° latitude in simulation, which is consistent with the low latitude boundary of the 0.02-20 keV particles detected by TED of the NOAA-15. A convective electric field, which is penetrating to the Earth-side of the NENL, is almost comparable to that of the solar wind. The present MHD simulation study give reasonable results even for extreme conditions and thereby its usefulness is demonstrated as a physical model for space weather studies.
Ashour-Abdalla, M., M. El-Alaoui, V. Peroomian, R. J. Walker, L. M. Zelenyi, L. A. Frank, and W. R. Paterson, Localized reconnection and substorm onset on Dec. 22, 1996, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3545–3548, 1999.
Ashour-Abdalla, M., M. El-Alaoui, F. V. Coroniti, R. J. Walker, and V. Peroomian, A new convection state at substorm onset: Results from an MHD study, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1965, 2002a.
Ashour-Abdalla, M., M. El-Alaoui, V. Peroomian, R. J. Walker, L. M. Zelenyi, L. A. Frank, and W. R. Paterson, The origin of the near-Earth plasma population during a substorm on November 24, 1996, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 2589–2605, 2002b.
Brecht, S. H., J. G. Lyon., J. A. Fedder, and K. Hain, A simulation study of east-west IMF effects on the magnetosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 8, 397–400, 1981.
Evans, D. S. and M. S. Greer, Polar orbiting environmental satellite space environment monitor: 2. Instrument description and archive data documentation, NOAA Tech. Memo. OAR SEC-93, Natl. Oceanic and Atmos. Admin., Boulder, Colo., 2000.
Fedder, J. A. and J. G. Lyon, The solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere current-voltage relationship, Geophys. Res. Lett., 14, 880–883, 1987.
Fedder, J. A., S. P. Slinker, J. G. Lyon., and R. D. Elphinstorne, Global numerical simulation of the growth phase and the expansion onset for a substorm observed by Viking, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 19083–19093, 1995.
Le, G., J. Raeder, C. T. Russell, G. Lu, S. M. Petrinec, and F. S. Mozer, Polar cusp and vicinity under strongly northward interplanetary magnetic field on April 11, 1997: Observations and MHD simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 21083–21093, 2001.
Lui, A. T. Y., R.W. McEntire, and K. B. Baker, A new insight on the cause iof magnetic storms, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 3413–3416, 2001.
Lyon, J. G., S. H. Brecht, J. D. Huba, J. A. Fedder, and P. J. Palmadesso, Computer simulation of a geomagnetic substorm, Phys. Rev. Lett., 46, 1038–1041, 1981.
Lyons, L. R., The Geospace Modeling Program Grand Challenge, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 14781–14785, 1998.
Lyons, L. R., J. M. Ruohoniemi, and G. Lu, Substorm-associated changes in large-scale convection during the November 24, 1996, Geospace Environment Modeling event, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 397–405, 2001.
Merkine, V. G., K. Papadopoulos, G. Milikh, A. S. Sharma, X. Shao, J. Lyon, and G. Goodrich, Effects of the solar wind electric field and ionospheric conductance on the cross polar cap potential: Results of global MHD modeling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 2180, 2003.
O’Brien, T. P. and M. B. Moldwin, Empirical plasmapause models from magnetic indices, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1152, 2003.
Ogino, T., R. J. Walker, M. Ashour-Abdalla, and J. M. Dawson, An MHD simulation of By-dependent magnetospheric convection and field-aligned currents during northward IMF, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 10835–10842, 1985.
Ogino, T., R. J. Walker, and M. Ashour-Abdalla, A global magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the magnetosheath and magnetosphere when the interplanetary magnetic field is northwards, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 20(6), 817, 1992.
Raeder, J., J. Berchem, and M. Ashour-Abdalla, The Geospace Environment Modeling Grand Challenge: Results from a global geospace circulation model, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 14787–14797, 1998.
Raeder, J., R. L. McPherron, L. A. Frank, S. Kokubun, G. Lu, T. Mukai, W. R. Paterson, J. B. Sigwarth, H. J. Singer, and J. A. Slavin, Global simulation of the Geospace Environment Modeling substorm challenge event, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 381–395, 2001.
Richmond, A. D., Y. Kamide, B.-H. Ahn, S.-I. Akasofu, D. Alcayde, M. Blanc, O. de la Beaujardiere, D. S. Evans, J. C. Foster, E. Friis-Christensen, T. J. Fuller-Rowell, J. M. Holt, D. Knipp, H.W. Kroehl, R. P. Lepping, R. J. Pellinen, C. Senior, and A. N. Zaitzev, Mapping electrodynamic features of the high-latitude ionosphere from localized observations: Combined incoherent-scatter radar and magnetometer measurements for January 18–19, 1984, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 5760–5776, 1988.
Richmond, A. D., Assimilative mapping of ionospheric electrodynamics, Adv. Space Res., 12, 59–68, 1992.
Shue, J.-H., P. Song, C. T. Russell, J. K. Chao, and Y.-H. Yang, Toward predicting the position of the magnetopause within geosynchronous orbit, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 2641–2656, 2000.
Siscoe, G. L., N. M. Crooker, and K. D. Siebert, Transpolar potential saturation: Role of region 1 current system and solar wind ram pressure, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 1321–1328, 2002.
Slinker, S. P., J. A. Fedder, J.M. Ruohoniemi, and J. G. Lyon, GlobalMHD simulation of the magnetosphere for November 24, 1996, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 361–380, 2001.
Troshichev, O., H. Hayakawa, A. Matsuoka, T. Mukai, and K. Tsuruda, Cross polar cap diameter and voltage as a function of PC index and interplanetary quantities, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 13429–13435, 1996.
Walker, R. J., T. Ogino, J. Raeder, and M. Ashour-Abdalla, A global magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the magnetosphere when the interplanetary magnetic field is southward: the onset of magnetotail reconnection, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 17235–17246, 1993.
Watanabe, K. and T. Sato, Global simulation of the solar windmagnetosphere interaction: The importance of its numerical validity, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 75–88, 1990.
Yahnin, A. G., V. A. Sergeev, B. B. Gvozdenvsky, and S. Vennerstrom, Magnetospheric source region of discrete auroras inferred from their relationship with isotropy boundaries of energetic particles, Ann. Geophys., 15, 943–958, 1997.
About this article
Cite this article
Park, K.S., Ogino, T. A study of the storm event on October 21–22, 1999 by the MHD simulation. Earth Planet Sp 58, 633–643 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03351961
- A global MHD simulation
- storm event study