Skip to main content

Identifying block rotations from remanent magnetization effect: Example from northern Central Turkey

Abstract

One of the difficulties in interpreting magnetic anomaly data is the distortion caused by rock body magnetization. There have been several successful studies carried out on the estimation of body magnetization based on the correlation of the Bouguer and magnetic anomaly data. A number of other significant research projects have aimed at identifying the effect of remanent magnetization in magnetic data only. In this paper, we present a threedimensional method for determining the body magnetization direction by means of comparing the amplitude of the analytic signal with the horizontal gradient of pseudogravity of magnetic anomaly using the correlation coefficient equation. The method has been successfully applied to test cases and is applied here to the aeromagnetic anomalies located in northern Central Turkey. Anomalies displaying individual polarities were separated out and correlated with themselves using the correlation coefficient equation. Counter-clockwise rotations in the range of 3° and 174° were determined. Clockwise rotations were determined in the range of 19° and 153°. The inclination of the body magnetization directions for one of the blocks was estimated to be 68.4°, while all other blocks had a low inclination angle of body magnetization in the range of 32° to 57°. These results may imply that these blocks gained their magnetizations when Turkey was at low latitudes. Possible buried faults are also identified. The results reported here comply with the new mobilistic theory.

References

  • Ates, A., T. Kayiran, and I. Sincer, Structural Interpretation of the Marmara Region, NW Turkey from aeromagnetic, seismic and gravity data, Tectonophysics, 367, 41–99, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. T. and R. Langel, Tables and Maps of the DGRF 1985 and IGRF 1990, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysical Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, IAGA Bull., 54, 158, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranov, V., A new method for interpretation of aeromagnetic maps: Pseudogravity anomalies, Geophysics, 22, 359–383,1957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilim, F. and A. Ates, A computer program to estimate the source body magnetization direction from magnetic and gravity anomalies, Comput. Geosci., 25, 231–240, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilim, F. and A. Ates, An enhanced method for estimation of body magnetization direction from pseudo-gravity and gravity data, Comput. Geosci., 30, 161–171, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingol, E., 1/2,000,000 scale geologic map of Turkey. Publication of the Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA) of Turkey, Ankara, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, R. J., Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications, 441 pp., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, R. J. and R. W. Simpson, Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies, Geophysics, 51, 1494–1498, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buyuksarac, A., D. Jordanova, A. Ates, and V. Karloukovski, Interpretation of the gravity and magnetic anomalies of the Cappadocia Region, Central Turkey, Pure Appl. Geophys., 162, 2197–2213, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodacre, A. K., Some comments on the calculation of the gravitational and magnetic attraction of a homogeneous rectangular prism, Geophys. Prosp., 21, 66–69, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gursoy, H., J. D. A. Piper, O. Tatar, and L. Mesci, Palaeomagnetic study of the Karaman and Karapinar volcanic complexes, central Turkey: neotectonic rotation in the south-central sector of the Anatolian Block, Tectonophysics, 299, 191–211, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClusky, S., S. Balassanian, A. Barka, C. Demir, S. Ergintav, I. Georgiev, O. Gurkan, M. Hamburger, K. Hurst, H. Kahle, K. Kastens, G. Kekelidze, R. King, V. Kotzev, O. Lenk, S. Mahmoud, A. Mishin, M. Nadariya, A. Ouzounis, D. Paradissis, Y. Peter, M. Prilepin, R. Reilinger, I. Sanli, H. Seeger, A. Tealeb, M. N. Toksoz, and G. Veis, Global positioning system constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 5695–5719, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, P. L., Introductory Probability and Statistical Applications, 339 pp, Wesley Publishing Co., Massachusetts, Addison, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, J. D. A., H. Gursoy, and O. Tatar, Paleomagnetism and magnetic properties of the Cappadocian ignimbrite succession, central Turkey and neogene tectonics of the Anatolian collage, J. Volcan. Geoth. Res., 117, 237–262, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roest W. R. and M. Pilkington, Identifying remanent magnetization effects in magnetic data, Geophysics, 58, 653–659, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roest, W. R., J. Verhoef, and M. Pilkington, Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal, Geophysics, 57, 116–25, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotstein, Y., Counterclockwise rotation of the Anatolian block, Tectonophysics, 108, 71–79, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanver, M. and E. Ponat, Kirsehir ve dolaylarina iliskin paleomanyetik bulgular. Kirsehir Masifinin rotasyonu, Istanbul Yerbilimleri, 2, 231–238, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saribudak, M., M. Sanver, A. M. C. Sengor, and N. Gorur, Paleomagnetic evidence for substantial rotation of the Almacik flake within the North Anatolian Fault Zone, NW Turkey, Geophys. J. Int., 102, 563–568, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storetvedt, K. M., Global Wrench Tectonics, 397 pp, Fagbokforlaget, Norway, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitz, I. and R. G. Henderson, A preliminary report on model studies of magnetic anomalies of three-dimensional bodies, Geophysics, 21, 794–814, 1956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Funda Bilim.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bilim, F., Ates, A. Identifying block rotations from remanent magnetization effect: Example from northern Central Turkey. Earth Planet Sp 59, 33–38 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352019

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352019

Key words

  • Magnetic anomaly
  • correlation coefficient function
  • northern Central Anatolia
  • block rotation
  • buried faults