Skip to main content

Consistency between the flow at the top of the core and the frozen-flux approximation

Abstract

The flow just below the core-mantle boundary is constrained by the radial component of the induction equation. In the Alfvén frozen-flux limit, thought to be applicable to the outer core on the decade timescale of interest in geomagnetism, this gives a single equation involving the known radial magnetic field and its secular variation in two unknown flow components, leading to a severe problem of non-uniqueness. Despite this, we have two specific pieces of flow information which can be deduced directly from the frozen-flux induction equation: the component of flow perpendicular to null-flux curves, contours on which the radial magnetic field vanishes, and the amount of horizontal convergence and divergence at local extrema (maxima, minima and saddle points) of the radial magnetic field. To produce global velocity maps, we make additional assumptions about the nature of the flow and invert the radial induction equation for flow coefficients. However, it is not clear a priori that the flows thus generated are consistent with what we know about them along null-flux curves and at local extrema. This paper examines that issue. We look at typical differences between the null-flux curve perpendicular flow component, and convergence and divergence values at extrema, deduced directly from the induction equation and those from the inversions, investigate the effect of forcing the inversions to produce the correct null-flux curve and extremal values, and characterise the uncertainties on the various quantities contributing. Although the differences between the flow values from the induction equation directly and obtained by inversion seem large, and imposing the direct flow information as side constraints during inversion alters the flows significantly, we also show that these differences are within the likely uncertainties. Thus, we conclude that flows obtained through inversion do not contravene the specific flow information obtained directly from the radial induction equation in the frozen-flux limit. This result should reassure the community that frozen-flux flow inversion is a consistent process, even if including the extremal-value and null-flux conditions as additional information on flow inversion is unlikely to be useful. Solving for a time-dependent core-mantle boundary field model and flow simultaneously may be a good way to produce a temporally-varying field model consistent with the frozen-flux constraint; the ability to fit the data with such a model could be used to establish the timescale over which the frozen-flux assumption is valid.

References

  • Amit, H. and P. Olson, Helical core flow from geomagnetic secular variation, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 147, 1–25, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backus, G. E., Kinematics of geomagnetic secular variation in a perfectly conducting core, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 263, 239–266, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backus, G. E., Confidence set inference with a prior quadratic bound, Geophys. J., 97, 119–150, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton, E. R., A simple method for determining the vertical growth-rate of vertical motion at the top of Earth’s outer core, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 24, 242–244, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloxham, J., The determination of fluid flow at the core surface from geomagnetic observations, in Mathematical Geophysics, A Survey of Recent Developments in Seismology and Geodynamics, edited by N. J. Vlaar, G. Nolet, M. J. R. Wortel, and S. A. P. L. Cloetingh, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloxham, J., Simple models of fluid flow at the core surface derived from geomagnetic field models, Geophys. J. Int., 99, 173–182, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloxham, J. and D. Gubbins, Geomagnetic field analysis 4: Testing the frozen-flux hypothesis, Geophys. J. Int., 84, 139–152, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloxham, J. and A. Jackson, Fluid flow near the surface of the Earth’s outer core, Rev. Geophys., 29, 97–120, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloxham, J. and A. Jackson, Time-dependent mapping of the magnetic field at the core-mantle boundary, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 19,537–19,563, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloxham, J., D. Gubbins, and A. Jackson, Geomagnetic secular variation, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 329, 415–502, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eymin, C. and G. Hulot, On core surface flows inferred from magnetic satellite data, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 152, 200–220, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gire, C. and J.-L. Le Mouël, Tangentially geostrophic flow at the coremantle boundary compatible with the observed geomagnetic secular variation: The large-scale component of the flow, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 59, 259–287, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubbins, D., Finding core motions from magnetic observations, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 306, 247–254, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubbins, D., Geomagnetic constraints on stratification at the top of Earth’s core, Earth Planets Space, 59, 661–664, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holme, R., Electromagnetic core-mantle coupling I: Explaining decadal variations in the Earth’s length of day, Geophys. J. Int., 132, 167–180, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holme, R., Large-scale flow in the core, in Core Dynamics, edited by P. Olson, vol. 8 of Treatise on Geophysics, chap. 4, pp. 107–130, Elsevier, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holme, R. and N. Olsen, Core surface flow modelling from high-resolution secular variation, Geophys. J. Int., 166, 518–528, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holme, R. and K. A. Whaler, Steady core flow in an azimuthally drifting reference frame, Geophys. J. Int., 145, 560–569, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulot, G., J. L. Le Mouël, and J. A. Wahr, Taking into account truncation problems and geomagnetic model accuracy in assessing computed flows at the core mantle boundary, Geophys. J. Int., 108, 224–246, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A., Statistical treatment of crustal magnetisation, Geophys. J. Int., 119, 991–998, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A., An approach to estimation problems containing uncertain parameters, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 90, 145–156, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A., Kelvin’s theorem applied to the Earth’s core, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 452, 2195–2201, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A., C. G. Constable, M. R. Walker, and R. L. Parker, Models of Earth’s main magnetic field incorporating flux and radial vorticity constraints, Geophys. J. Int., 171, 133–144, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Mouël, J.-L., C. Gire, and T. Madden, Motions at the core surface in the geostrophic approximation, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 39, 270–287, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosegaard, K. and C. Rygaard-Hjalsted, Probabilistic analysis of implicit inverse problems, Inverse problems, 15, 1999.

  • Roberts, P. H. and S. Scott, On analysis of the secular variation, 1, A hydromagnetic constraint: Theory, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 17, 137–151, 1965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorhies, C. V., Steady surficial core motions: an alternate method, Geophys. Res. Lett., 13, 1537–1540, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorhies, C. V. and G. E. Backus, Steady flows at the top of the core from geomagnetic-field models—the steady motions theorem, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn., 32, 163–173, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whaler, K. A., Does the whole of the Earth’s core convect?, Nature, 287, 528–530, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whaler, K. A., Fluid upwelling at the core-mantle boundary—resolvability from surface geomagnetic data, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 78, 453–473, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whaler, K. A., Geomagnetic evidence for fluid upwelling at the coremantle boundary, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 86, 563–588, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whaler, K. A. and D. Gubbins, Spherical harmonic analysis of the geomagnetic field: an example of a linear inverse problem, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 65, 645–693, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicht, J. and D. Jault, Constraining electromagnetic core-mantle coupling, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 111, 161–177, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. A. Whaler.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whaler, K.A., Holme, R. Consistency between the flow at the top of the core and the frozen-flux approximation. Earth Planet Sp 59, 1219–1229 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352070

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352070

Key words

  • Core surface flow modelling
  • frozen flux hypothesis