Skip to main content

Advertisement

Earth, Planets and Space
Earth, Planets and Space Cover Image

You are viewing the new article page. Let us know what you think. Return to old version

Article | Open | Published:

Spatial analysis of the frequency-magnitude distribution and decay rate of aftershock activity of the 2000 Western Tottori earthquake

Earth, Planets and Spacevolume 54, pages847–859 (2002) | Download Citation

Abstract

The b-value of the frequency-magnitude distribution and the parameters in the modified Omori law, describing the decay rate of aftershock activity, are investigated for more than 4000 aftershocks identified in the first four months after the Western Tottori earthquake (October 6, 2000). We used the JMA data catalog, containing aftershocks with magnitude larger than or equal to 2.0. The studied area is first divided into three areas: one region (A) corresponding to the main aftershock area and other two (B and C) corresponding to seismic activity probably triggered by the stress change caused by the main shock. For region A, the magnitude of completeness (Mc) decreases with time, from the largest value of 3.2 in the first two hours of the sequence, to 2.0, about four days after the main shock. Taking the threshold magnitude as 3.2, we estimated the b-value for the whole region A to be about 1.3 and p-value around 1. However, highly significant variations in both b and p values are found when analyzing their spatial distribution in region A. The seismic activity in the regions B and C started about 2.5 days after the main shock. The b-value for region B (Mc = 2) is 1.05. The decay rate of earthquake activity in Region B is well modeled by the modified Omori law and the p-value is found to be relatively low (0.83). The number of events in region C is too small for a meaningful study. The physical interpretation of the spatial variation of the parameters is not straight forward. However, the variation of b-value can be related to the stress distribution after the main shock, as well as the history of previous ruptures. Thus, the relatively low stress in the regions that have already experienced rupture is probably responsible for the larger value of b found in these areas. Regions with relatively low b-value, on the other hand, are probably regions under higher applied shear stress after the main shock. Alternatively, one can hypothesize that the areas that experienced slip are more fractured, favoring higher b-values. The larger p-values correlate well with the regions that experienced larger slip during the main shock, while small p-values are found generally in regions that have not ruptured recently. The variation of p-value can be related with the frictional heating produced during rupture. The crustal structure may explain some local features of b and p value spatial distribution. In order to verify our hypothesis we also analyzed the seismic activity that occurred before the Tottori earthquake, starting in 1978, using the data of DPRI, Kyoto University. It seems that the previous seismic activity associated with some moderate events in 1989, 1990 and 1997 had an influence on the following seismicity in the area—in particular on the spatial distribution of b and p values observed for the aftershocks of the Tottori earthquake. The aftershocks of the 1997 M5.5 earthquake have a larger p-value than previous aftershock sequences, while the b-value has a clear increase following the M5.5 event.

References

  1. Aki, K., Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log N = a−bM and its confidence limits, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., Tokyo Univ., 43, 237–239, 1965.

  2. Earthquake Prediction Information Division, JMA, Outline of the western Tottori Prefecture earthquake in 2000, Rep. Coord. Comm. Eq. Pred., 65, 525–535, 2001 (in Japanese, with English explanation of figures).

  3. Fukuyama, E., W. L. Ellsworth, F. Waldhauser, and A. Kubo, Very fine fault structure of the 2000 western Tottori, Japan, earthquake, Proceedings of the 2001 Japan Earth and Planetary Science Joint Meeting, Tokyo, S3-007, 2001.

  4. Guo, Z. and Y. Ogata, Statistical relations between the parameters of aftershocks in time, space, and magnitude, J. Geophys. Res., 102(B2), 2857–2873, 1997.

  5. Gutenberg, R. and C. F. Richter, Frequency of earthquakes in California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 34, 185–188, 1944.

  6. Ito, K. and B. Enescu, Heterogeneous structure and b and p values relating to the rupture of the 2000 Tottori-ken Seibu earthquake, Proceedings of the Int. Symposium on Slip and Flow processes in an below the seismogenic layer, Sendai, Japan, 78-1: 78–6, 2001.

  7. Kagan, Y. Y. and L. Knopoff, Stochastic synthesis of earthquake catalogs, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 2853–2862, 1981.

  8. Kisslinger, C. and L. M. Jones, Properties of aftershocks in southern California, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 11947–11958, 1991.

  9. Main, I. G., Statistical physics, seismogenesis, and seismic hazard, Reviews of Geophysics, 34 (4), 433–462, 1996.

  10. Matsumura, K., Seismic activity in the region around the Tottori-Shimanen border before the 2000 Tottoriken-Seibu earthquake, Special publication of DPRI, Kyoto University dedicated to the 2000 Tottoriken-Seibu earthquake, 5–11, 2001 (in Japanese).

  11. Mikumo, T. and T. Miyatake, Earthquake sequences on a frictional fault model with non-uniform strengths and relaxation times, Geophys. J. R. Astron Soc, 59, 497–522, 1979.

  12. Mogi, K., Magnitude-frequency relation for elastic shocks accompanying fractures of various materials and some related problems in earthquakes, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., Univ. Tokyo, 40, 831–853, 1962a.

  13. Mogi, K., Study of the elastic shocks caused by the fracture of heterogeneous materials and its relation to earthquake phenomena, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., Univ. Tokyo, 40, 125–173, 1962b.

  14. Mogi, K., On the time distribution of aftershocks accompanying the recent major earthquakes in and near Japan, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., Univ. Tokyo, 40, 107–124, 1962c.

  15. Mogi, K., Earthquakes and fractures, Tectonophys., 5, 35–55, 1967.

  16. Mori, J. and R. E. Abercrombie, Depth dependence of earthquake frequency-magnitude distributions in California: Implications for rupture initiation, J. Geophys. Res., 102(B7), 15081–15090, 1997.

  17. Ogata, Y., Estimation of the parameters in the modified Omori formula for aftershock frequencies by the maximum likelihood procedure, J. Phys. Earth, 31, 115–124, 1983.

  18. Ohmi, S., K. Watanabe, T. Shibutani, S. Nakao, N. Hirano, A. Nakao, H. Takeuchi, F. Takeuchi, S. Miwa, A. Shito, A. Kim, and B. Enescu, The 2000 Tottori-ken Seibu earthquake—seismic activity derived from the compilation of DPRI, JMA and Hi-net data—, Bull. Disas. Prev Res. Inst., 44, B–1, 2001.

  19. Reasenberg, P. A., Computer programs ASPAR, GSAS and ENAS and APROB for the statistical modeling of aftershock sequences and estimation of aftershock hazard, USGS Open File Rep., 94–221, 1994.

  20. Scholz, C. H., The frequency-magnitude relation of microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 58, 399–415, 1968.

  21. Sekiguchi, H. and T. Iwata, Rupture process of the 2000 Tottori-Ken Seibu earthquake using strong ground motion data, Web page: http://sms.dpri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/iwata/ttr_e.html, 2000.

  22. Shi, Y. and B. A. Bolt, The standard error of the magnitude-frequency b value, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 72(5), 1677–1687, 1982.

  23. Shibutani, T, S. Nakao, R. Nishida, T. Fumio, K. Watanabe, and Y. Umeda, Swarm-like seismic activities in 1989, 1990 and 1997 which preceded the western Tottori earthquake (6 October 2000, MJ = 7.3), Rep. Coord. Comm. Eq. Pred., 65, 576–578, 2001 (in Japanese, with English explanation of figures).

  24. Utsu, T., Magnitude of earthquakes and occurrence of their aftershocks, Zisin, Ser 2, 10, 35–45, 1957 (in Japanese).

  25. Utsu, T., A statistical study on the occurrence of aftershocks, Geophys. Mag., 30, 521–605, 1961.

  26. Utsu, T., A method for determining the value of b in formula log N=a-bM showing the magnitude-frequency relation for earthquakes, Geophys. Bull. Hokkaido Univ., 13, 99–103, 1965 (in Japanese).

  27. Utsu, T., On seismicity, in Report of the Joint Research Institute for Statistical Mathematics, Inst. for Stat. Math., Tokyo, pp. 139–157, 1992.

  28. Utsu, T., Y. Ogata, and R. S. Matsu’ura, The centenary of the Omori formula for a decay law of aftershock activity, J. Phys. Earth, 43, 1–33, 1995.

  29. Warren, N. W. and G. V. Latham, An experimental study of thermally induced microfracturing and its relation to volcanic seismicity, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 4455–4464, 1970.

  30. Watanabe, H. and A. Kuroiso, Aftershocks of the earthquake of the central part of Gifu Prefecture, September 9, 1969, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst, Univ. Tokyo, 48, 1195–1208, 1970 (in Japanese).

  31. Wiemer, S., Introducing probabilistic aftershock hazard mapping, Geophys. Res. Lett, 27(20), 3405–3408, 2000.

  32. Wiemer, S., A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP, Seis. Res. Lett, 72(2), 374–383, 2001.

  33. Wiemer, S. and J. Benoit, Mapping the b value anomaly at 100 km depth in the Alaska and New Zealand subduction zones, Geophys. Res. Lett, 23, 1557–1560, 1996.

  34. Wiemer, S. and K. Katsumata, Spatial variability of seismicity parameters in aftershock zones, J. Geophys. Res., 104(B6), 13135–13151, 1999.

  35. Wiemer, S. and M. Wyss, Mapping the frequency-magnitude distribution in asperities: An improved technique to calculate recurrence times, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 15115–15128, 1997.

  36. Wiemer, S. and M. Wyss, Minimum magnitude of complete reporting in earthquake catalogs: examples from Alaska, the Western United States and Japan, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 90, 859–869, 2000.

  37. Wiemer, S. and R. F. Zuniga, ZMAP—A software package to analyze seismicity (abstract), EOS Trans. AGU, 75(43), Fall Meet. Suppl., 456, 1994.

  38. Wyss, M., Towards a physical understanding of the earthquake frequency distribution, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc, 31, 341–359, 1973.

  39. Wyss, M., K. Shimazaki, and S. Wiemer, Mapping active magma chambers by b values beneath the off-Ito volcano, Japan, J. Geophys. Res., 102(B9), 20413–20433, 1997.

  40. Yagi, Y. and M. Kikuchi, Source Rupture Process of the Tottori-ken Seibu earthquake of Oct. 6, 2000, Web page: http://wwweic.eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp/yuji/tottori/, 2000.

  41. Yamakawa, N., Foreshocks, aftershocks, and earthquake swarms (IV)— Frequency decrease of after shocks in its initial and later stages, Pap. Met. Geophys., 19, 109–119, 1968.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Research Center for Earthquake Prediction, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Gokanosho, Uji, Kyoto, 611-0011, Japan

    • Bogdan Enescu
    •  & Kiyoshi Ito

  2. National Institute for Earth Physics, P.O. Box MG-2, 76900, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania

    • Bogdan Enescu

Authors

  1. Search for Bogdan Enescu in:

  2. Search for Kiyoshi Ito in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bogdan Enescu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Seismic Activity
  • Main Shock
  • Aftershock Sequence
  • Frictional Heating
  • Large Aftershock