Skip to main content

High-accuracy statistical simulation of planetary accretion: I. Test of the accuracy by comparison with the solution to the stochastic coagulation equation

Abstract

The object of this series of studies is to develop a highly accurate statistical code for describing the planetary accumulation process. In the present paper, as a first step, we check the validity of the method proposed by Wetherill and Stewart (1989) by comparing the results obtained by their method with the analytical solution to the stochastic coagulation equation (or to a well-evaluated numerical solution). As the collisional probability Ai j between bodies with masses of im1 and jm1 (m1 being the unit mass), we consider the two cases: one is Ai j i × j and another is Ai j min(i, j )(i 1/3 + j1/3)(i + j ). In both cases, it is known that runaway growth occurs. The latter case corresponds to a simplified model of the planetesimal accumulation. We assumed that a collision of two bodies leads to their coalescence. Wetherill and Stewart’s method contains some parameters controlling the practical numerical computation. Among these, two parameters are important: the mass division parameter δ, which determines the mass ratio of the adjacent mass batches, and the time division parameter , which controls the size of a time step in numerical integration. Through a number of numerical simulations for the case of Ai j = i × j, we find that when δ ≤ 1.6 and ≤ 0.03 the numerical simulation can reproduce the analytical solution within a certain level of accuracy independently of the size of the body system. For the case of the planetesimal accumulation, it is shown that the simulation with δ ≤ 1.3 and ≤ 0.04 can describe precisely runaway growth. Because the accumulation process is stochastic, in order to obtain reliable mean values it is necessary to take the ensemble mean of the numerical results obtained with different random number generators. It is also found that the number of simulations, Nc, demanded to obtain the reliable mean value is about 500 and does not strongly depend on the functional form of Ai j. From the viewpoint of the numerical handling, the above value of δ(≤ 1.3) and Nc(500) are reasonable and, hence, we conclude that the numerical method proposed by Wetherill and Stewart is a valid and useful method for describing the planetary accumulation process. The real planetary accumulation process is more complex since it is coupled with the velocity evolution of the planetesimals. In the subsequent paper, we will complete the high-accuracy statistical code which simulate the accumulation process coupled with the velocity evolution and test the accuracy of the code by comparing with the results of N -body simulation.

References

  1. Aarseth, S. J., D. N. C. Lin, and P. L. Palmer, Evolution of planetesimals. II. Numerical simulations, Astrophys. J., 403, 351–376, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barge, P. and R. Pellat, Mass spectrum and velocity dispersions during planetesimal accumulation. I. Accretion, Icarus, 93, 270–287, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bayewitz, M. H., J. Yerushalmi, S. Katz, and R. Shinnar, The extent of correlations in a stochastic coalescence process, J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 1604–1614, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beaugé, C. and S. J. Aarseth, N-body simulation of planetary formation, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 245, 30–39, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Greenberg, R., J. Wacker, C. R. Chapman, and W. K. Hartmann, Planetesimals to planets: Numerical simulation of collisional evolution, Icarus, 35, 1–26, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenzweig, Y. and J. J. Lissauer, Accretion rates of protoplanets II. Gaussian distributions of planetesimal velocities, Icarus, 100, 440–463, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hayashi, C., K. Nakazawa, and Y. Nakagawa, Formation of the solar system, in Protostars and Planets II, edited by D. C. Black and M. S. Matthews, 1100 pp., Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kokubo, E. and S. Ida, On runaway growth of planetesimals, Icarus, 123, 180–191, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kokubo, E. and S. Ida, Formation of protoplanets from planetesimals in the solar nebula, Icarus, 1998 (submitted).

  10. Lecar, M. and S. J. Aarseth, A numerical simulation of the formation of the terrestrial planets, Astrophys. J., 305, 564–579, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lushnikov, A. A., Coagulation in finite systems, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 65, 276–285, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Makino, J., T. Fukushige, Y. Funato, and E. Kokubo, On the mass distribution of planetesimals in the early runaway stage, New Astronomy, 3, 411–416, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Marcus, A. H., Stochastic coalescence, Technometrics, 10, 133–143, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakagawa, Y., C. Hayashi, and K. Nakazawa, Accumulation of planetesimals in the solar nebula, Icarus, 54, 361–376, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ohtsuki, K., Y. Nakagawa, and K. Nakazawa, Growth of the earth in nebula gas, Icarus, 75, 552–565, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Safronov, V. S., Evolution of the Protoplanetary Cloud and Formation of the Earth and Planets, Nauka, Moscow, 1969 (Transl. 1972 NASA TT F-677).

  17. Smoluchowski, M. V., Drei vortrage uber diffusion, brownshe molekularbe-wegung und koagulation von kolloidteilchen, Phys. Zeits., 17, 557–571; 585–599, 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spaute, D., S. J. Weidenschilling, D. R. Davis, and F. Marzari, Accretional evolution of a planetesimal swarm: 1. A new simulation, Icarus, 92, 147–164, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart, G. R. and S. Ida, Velocity evolution of planetesimals: Unified analytical formulae and comparison with N-body simulations, Icarus, 1998 (submitted).

  20. Tanaka, H. and K. Nakazawa, Stochastic coagulation equation and validity of the statistical coagulation equation, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 45, 361–381, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tanaka, H. and K. Nakazawa, Validity of the statistical coagulation equation and runaway growth of protoplanets, Icarus, 107, 404–412, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Trubnikov, B. A., Solution of the coagulation equations in the case of bilinear coefficient of adhesion of particles, Sov. Phys. Dokl., 16, 124–126, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wetherill, G. W., Comparison of analytical and physical modeling of planetesimal accumulation, Icarus, 88, 336–354, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wetherill, G. W. and G. R. Stewart, Accumulation of a swarm of small planetesimals, Icarus, 77, 330–357, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wetherill, G. W. and G. R. Stewart, Formation of planetary embryos: Effects of fragmentation, low relative velocity, and independent variation of eccentricity and inclination, Icarus, 106, 190–209, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Inaba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inaba, S., Tanaka, H., Ohtsuki, K. et al. High-accuracy statistical simulation of planetary accretion: I. Test of the accuracy by comparison with the solution to the stochastic coagulation equation. Earth Planet Sp 51, 205–217 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352224

Download citation

Keywords

  • Accumulation Process
  • Statistical Code
  • Smoluchowski Equation
  • Ensemble Means
  • Coagulation Equation