Skip to main content

Significance of the high-latitude geomagnetic index AES-80: comparison with the PC index

Abstract

A new index AES-80 was derived in order to provide a measure of the geomagnetic activity at high southern latitudes (Ballatore et al., 1998). The comparison between the southern hemisphere AES-80 with the northern hemisphere PC index is reported here for the period May 1994–April 1995. It is found that during southward IMF the two parameters record the geomagnetic disturbances rather similarly. In contrast, during northward IMF, only AES-80 is capable of recording geomagnetic activity occurring in the nominal polar cap region. In agreement with this finding, a slightly higher correlation coefficient is found between AES-80 and PC during southward IMF than during the northward IMF condition. Although at any time the two indices reflect opposite seasons, the overall correlations found between the two indices are significant, independent of the specific UT interval considered. The UT modulation (which should possibly be taken into account in the use of the indices) has been calculated for the AES-80 and the PC index. The results show that, for the specific period considered, the PC index dependence on UT is more significant than that of the AES-80 parameter.

References

  1. Allen, J. H. and H. W. Kroehl, Spatial and temporal distributions of magnetic effects of auroral electrojets as derived from AE indices, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 3667, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ballatore, P., C. G. Maclennan, M. J. Engebretson, M. Candidi, J. Bitterly, C. I. Meng, and G. Burns, A new southern high latitude index, Ann. Geophysicae, 16, 1589, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis, T. N. and M. Sugiura, Auroral electrojet activity index AE and its universal time variations, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 785, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Friis-Christensen, E. and J. Wilhjelm, Polar cap currents for different directions of the interplanetary magnetic field in the Y–Z plane, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 1248–1260, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Saroso, S., Relationship between IMF By and geomagnetic activity in the southern polar cap, Ann. Geophysicae, 11, 470, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saroso, S., M. Sugiura, T. Iyemori, T. Araki, and T. Kamei, Derivation of polar cap AE indices, Proc. NIPR Symp. Upper Atmos. Phys., 5, 35–45, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Troshichev, O. A., V. G. Andrezen, S.Vennerstrøm, and E.Friis-Christensen, Magnetic activity in the polar cap—a new index, Planet. Space Sci., 36, 1988.

  8. Vennerstrøm, S., E. Friis-Christensen, O. A. Troshichev, and V. G. Andrezen, Comparison between the polar cap index, pc, and auroral electrojet indices AE, AL, and AU, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 101, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Weatherwax, A. T., T. J. Rosenberg, C. G. Maclennan, and J. H. Doolittle, Substorm precipitation in the polar cap and associated Pc5 modulation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 579, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Ballatore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ballatore, P., Maclennan, C.G. Significance of the high-latitude geomagnetic index AES-80: comparison with the PC index. Earth Planet Sp 51, 425–430 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352246

Download citation

Keywords

  • Geomagnetic Activity
  • Solar Wind Speed
  • Geomagnetic Disturbance
  • Auroral Oval
  • Auroral Electrojet