Skip to main content

Advertisement

We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.

The systematic analysis of the transformation between the German geodetic reference system (DHDN, DHHN) and the ETRF system (DREF91)

Abstract

The 69 colocated sites in the area of the West Germany are used to estimate the transformation parameters with the seven parameter similarity transformation model. According to the solutions of transformation parameters and corresponding residuals between DHDN and ETRF, detail analyses for global and regional transformation are performed, which show that the global accuracy of the transformation between DHDN and ETRF is ±5 m with WRMS (weighted root mean square) of ±0.64 m and regional transformations have much better fitting. Through the comparisons of estimated parameters of each state, the systematic differences in definition and observation among regional systems of DHDN have been confirmed. Practical usage of 7 parameter similarity transformation and some suggestions are pointed out.

References

  1. Denker, H., A new Gravimetric Quasigeoid for the Ferderal Republic of Germany, Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe B, Nr. 291, München, 1989.

  2. Denker, H., The quasigeoid anomaly data from EGG97, personal communication, 1998.

  3. Fröhlich, H., et al., Praxisnahe 3D-kartesische 7-Parameter-Transformation für Anwendungen in der Landesvermessung—Das Programm TRANSSIB—,Vermessungswesen und Raumordnung, S 146–151,1998. Heitz,au] S., Koordinaten auf geodaetischen Bezugsflaechen, Dümmler Verlag Bonn, 1985.

  4. Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., et al., Global Positioning System—Theory and Practice, third revised edition, Springer-Verlag Wien-New York, 1994.

  5. Ihde, J. and W. Lindstrot, Datumstransformation zwischen den Bezugssystemen ETRF/WGS, DHDN und System 42, ZfV, Nr. 4, S.192-196, 1995.

  6. Niemeier, W., Zur Nutzung von GPS-Meflergebnissen in Netzen der Landesund Ingenieurvermessung, ZfV, Nr. 8/9, S.542-556, 1992.

  7. Rapp, R. H., Geometric Geodesy, Part I, Department of Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, September, 1984.

  8. Rinner, K., et al., Die Deutsch-Österreichische Dopplerkampagne, DGK, B Nr. 260, München, 1982.

  9. Späth, H., Mathematische Software zur linearen Regression, R. Oldenbourg Verlag Munchen Wien, 1987.

  10. Torge, W., Geodesy, W. de Gruyter, Berlin-New York, 1991.

  11. Vermeer, M. (editor), Coordinate System, GPS and the Geoid, Reports of the Finnish geodetic Institute, 1995.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianqing Cai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, J. The systematic analysis of the transformation between the German geodetic reference system (DHDN, DHHN) and the ETRF system (DREF91). Earth Planet Sp 52, 947–952 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352310

Download citation

Keywords

  • Transformation Parameter
  • Regional Transformation
  • Geodetic Reference System
  • Weighted Root Mean Square
  • Geodetic Institute