Skip to main content

Volume 52 Supplement 12

Special Issue: Geomagnetic Field Modelling and IGRF 2000

An evaluation of candidate geomagnetic field models for IGRF 2000

Abstract

A global evaluation is made of the four candidate models for IGRF 2000 (main field and secular variation) that were submitted to the IAGA Working Group V-8 by the deadline in February 1999. A description of the data used and the method of modelling is summarised for each candidate model. The models are then compared with one another and with recent data from observatories and magnetic surveys. It is concluded that none of the candidate main-field models is sufficiently good for an IGRF and that a new model should be derived using Ørsted data.

References

  • De Santis, A., C. Falcone, and F. J. Lowes, Remarks on the mean-square values of the geomagnetic field and its components, Annali di Geofisica, XXXVIII(2), 167–175, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • IAGA Division V, Working Group 8, International Geomagnetic Reference Field, 1995 Revision, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 47, 1257–1261, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, S. and D. R. Barraclough, An evaluation of candidate geomag-neticfield models for DGRF 1990 and IGRF 1995, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 49, 263–278, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Macmillan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Macmillan, S. An evaluation of candidate geomagnetic field models for IGRF 2000. Earth Planet Sp 52, 1163–1165 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352346

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352346

Keywords

  • Candidate Model
  • Secular Variation
  • Repeat Station
  • Magnetic Survey
  • British Geological Survey