Special Issue: Geomagnetic Field Modelling and IGRF 2000
- Open Access
Modelling of attitude error in vector magnetic data: application to Ørsted data
Earth, Planets and Space volume 52, pages 1187–1197 (2000)
Analysis of data from the Ørsted satellite indicates that the largest source of error arises from an anisotropic attitude uncertainty, related to poorly determined rotation about the axis of the star imager. For two data sets from May and December 1999, I quantify this error, and review and apply a formalism designed to allow for this problem. I argue that, when modelled correctly, this attitude uncertainty should not significantly damage the main field models obtained from Ørsted data.
Cain, J. C, Z. Wang, C. Kluth, and D. R. Schmitz, Derivation of a geomag netic model to n = 63, Geophys. J., 97, 431–441, 1989.
Dunlop, M. W., M. K. Dougherty, S. Kellock, and D. J. Southwood, Opera tion of the dual magnetometer on Cassini: science performance, Planet. Space Sci., 47, 1389–1405, 1999.
Gubbins, D. and J. Bloxham, Geomagnetic field analysis—III. Magnetic fields on the core-mantle boundary, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc, 80, 695–713, 1985.
Holme, R. and J. Bloxham, Alleviation of the Backus effect in geomagnetic field modelling, Geophys. Res. Lett, 22, 1641–1644, 1995.
Holme, R. and J. Bloxham, The treatment of attitude errors in satellite geomagnetic data, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 98, 221–233, 1996.
Holme, R. and A. Jackson, The cause and treatment of anisotropic errors in near-Earth geomagnetic data, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 103, 375–388, 1997.
Langel, R. A. and R. H. Estes, The near-Earth magnetic field at 1980 deter mined from Magsat data, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 2495–2509, 1985.
Langel, R. A., G. Ousley, J. Berbert, J. Murphy, and M. Settle, The Magsat mission, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 243–245, 1982.
Langel, R. A., T. J. Sabaka, R. T. Baldwin, and J. A. Conrad, The near-Earth magnetic field from magnetospheric and quiet-day ionospheric sources and how it is modeled, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 98, 235–267, 1996.
Lowes, F. J., Mean-square values on sphere of spherical harmonic vector fields, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 2179, 1966.
Lowes, F. J., Vector errors in spherical harmonic analysis of scalar data, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc, 42, 637–651, 1975.
Lowes, F. J. and J. E. Martin, Optimum use of satellite intensity and vector data in modelling the main geomagnetic field, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 48, 183–192, 1987.
Macmillan, S. and J. M. Quinn, The 2000 revision of the joint UK/US geomagnetic field models and an IGRF 2000 candidate model, Earth Planets Space, 52, this issue, 1149–1162, 2000.
Olsen, N., T. J. Sabaka, and L. Tøffner-Clausen, Determination of the IGRF 2000 model, Earth Planets Space, 52, this issue, 1175–1182, 2000.
Rygaard-Hjalsted, C, C. G. Constable, and R. L. Parker, The influence of correlated crustal signals in modelling the main geomagnetic field, Geophys. J. Int., 130, 717–726, 1997.
Shure, L., R. L. Parker, and G. E. Backus, Harmonic splines for geomagnetic modelling, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 28, 215–229, 1982.
Stern, D. P. and J. H. Bredekamp, Error enhancement in geomagnetic models derived from scalar data, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 1776–1782, 1975.
Whaler, K. A. and D. Gubbins, Spherical harmonic analysis of the geomagnetic field: an example of a linear inverse problem, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc, 65, 645–693, 1981.
About this article
Cite this article
Holme, R. Modelling of attitude error in vector magnetic data: application to Ørsted data. Earth Planet Sp 52, 1187–1197 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352351
- Attitude Error
- Vector Data
- Scalar Data
- Attitude Uncertainty
- Spherical Harmonic Analysis