Skip to main content

Volume 52 Supplement 12

Special Issue: Geomagnetic Field Modelling and IGRF 2000

Ørsted and Magsat scalar anomaly fields

Abstract

The scalar anomaly field determined from available Ørsted data is compared with the upward continued scalar anomaly field derived from Magsat data. Two techniques were used to remove the core field from the Ørsted satellite data. In the first method, monthly spherical harmonic core field models of degree and order 13 derived from scalar and vector data were subtracted, and in the second method, along-track high-pass filtering of scalar data only was used. In both methods, the binned residuals were interpolated to a sphere, and subsequently filtered. Monthly degree and order 13 spherical harmonic core field models were removed from Magsat vector data. The binned Magsat vector residuals were interpolated to a sphere, filtered, and upward continued by high degree spherical harmonic analysis. The corresponding Magsat scalar anomaly field at Ørsted altitude was then determined. For latitudes below 50 degrees, removal of the core field by signal processing techniques from presently available Ørsted data led to a scalar anomaly field in better agreement with that determined from Magsat data, than removal by spherical harmonic analysis.

References

  • Arkani-Hamed, J., R. A. Langel, and M. Purucker, Magnetic anomaly maps of the Earth derived from POGO and Magsat data, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 24075–24090, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backus, G., R. Parker, and C. Constable, Foundations of Geomagnetism, p. 140, Cambridge University Press, 1996.

  • Cain, J. C., Z. Wang, C. Kluth, and D. R. Schmitz, Derivation of a geomag netic model to n = 63, Geophys. J. Int., 97, 43–441, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, J. F., Nonrecursive digital filter design using window function, in Proceedings of the 1974 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, pp. 20–23, IEEE, New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langel, R. A. and W.J. Hinze, The Magnetic Field of the Earth’s Lithosphere, 429 pp., Cambridge University Press, 1998.

  • Olsen, N., Data for Ørsted Initial Field Model, e-mail to Ørsted main field investigators, 27 March 2000.

  • Olsen, N., L. Tffner-Clausen, R. Risbo, P. Brauser, J. Merayo, F. Primdahl, and T. Sabaka, In-flight calibration methods used for the Ørsted Mission, 2000.

  • Schuster, A., On some definite integrals and a new method of reducing a function of spherical co-ordinates to a series of spherical harmonics, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 200, 181–223, 1903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Understanding models of the geomagnetic field by Fourier anal ysis, J. Geomag. Geoelectr, 39, 333–347, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, D. E., Analysis of the geomagnetic field by means of Cartesian components, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 1, 347–360, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. J. Ivers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ivers, D.J., Stening, R.J., Turner, J. et al. Ørsted and Magsat scalar anomaly fields. Earth Planet Sp 52, 1213–1225 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352354

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352354

Keywords

  • Vector Data
  • Satellite Track
  • Spherical Harmonic Analysis
  • Scalar Anomaly
  • Surface Spherical Harmonic