Skip to main content

Advertisement

Three-dimensional viscoelastic interseismic deformation model for the Cascadia subduction zone

Article metrics

Abstract

Contemporary deformation of the Cascadia forearc consists of an elastic interseismic strain build-up as part of the subduction earthquake deformation “cycle” anda secular deformation primarily in the form ofarc-parallel translation and clockwise rotationofforearc blocks. Athree-dimensional (3-D) elastic dislocation model, constrainedby vertical deformation data, was developed previously to study the interseismic deformation. In this study, we develop a 3-D viscoelastic finite element model for the Cascadia subduction zone to study the temporal and spatial variations of interseismic deformation, and we compare the model results primarily with horizontal geodetic deformation observations. The model has an elastic lithosphere/slab and a viscoelastic mantle which has a viscosity of 1019 Pa s as constrained by recent postglacial rebound analyses. For comparison, we adopt a seismogenic zone geometry that was used in the previous elastic dislocation model, and we test the effects of different estimates of relative plate motion on the model predictions. Interseismic deformation is simulated by assigning a backslip rate to the locked zone of the subduction fault, preceded by an earthquake rupture of the same zone. Based on preliminary model results, we draw the following conclusions: (1) The deformation rate decreases through the interseismic period. A seaward motion is predicted for inland sites early in the interseismic period, an effect of postseismic creep of the mantle. (2) Model strain rates 300 years after the earthquake are consistent with the observed values, regardless of the plate motion models used. The horizontal velocities in northern Cascadia decrease landward at a slower rate than predicted by the elastic dislocation model, providing a better fit to observations. (3) Oblique subduction causes strain partitioning. As a result, the direction of local maximum contraction is much less oblique than plate convergence. The northerly direction of the GPS velocities in southern Cascadia represent a northward translation of the forearc. The secular deformation of the forearc may be partially accommodated through earthquake deformation cycles, but it may be better modeled as a process independent of the earthquake cycle.

References

  1. Atwater, B. F. and E. Hemphill-Haley, Recurrence intervals for great earthquakes of the past 3500 years at northeastern Willapa Bay, Washington, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1576, 108 pp., 1997.

  2. Axelsson, O., Iterative Solution Methods, 654 pp., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.

  3. Blackwell, D. D., J. L. Steele, and S. Kelley, Heat flow in the State of Washington and thermal conditions in the Cascade Range, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 19,495–19,516, 1990.

  4. Cohen, S. C., Evaluation of the importance of model features for cyclic deformation due to dip-slip faulting, Geophys. J. Int., 119, 831–841, 1994.

  5. DeMets, C. and T. H. Dixon, New kinematic models for Pacific-North America motion from 3 Ma to present, I: Evidence for steady motion and biases in the NUVEL-1A model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 1921–1924, 1999.

  6. DeMets, C., R. G. Gordon, D. F. Argus, and S. Stein, Current plate motions, Geophys. J. Int., 101, 425–478, 1990.

  7. DeMets, C., R. G. Gordon, D. F. Argus, and S. Stein, Effects of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 2191–2194, 1994.

  8. Dmowska, R. and L. C. Lovison, Intermediate-term seismic precursors for some coupled subduction zones, Pure Appl. Geophys., 126, 643–664, 1988.

  9. Douglass, J. J. and iB. A. Buffett, The stress state implied by dislocation models of subduction deformation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 3115–3118, 1995.

  10. Dragert, H., Recent horizontal strain accumulation on Vancouver Island, British Columbia (abstract), Eos Trans. AGU, 72, Fall meeting suppl., 314, 1991.

  11. Dragert, H. and M. Lisowski, Crustal deformation measurements on Vancouver Island, British Columbia: 1976 to 1988, in Global and Regional Geodynamics, edited by P. Vyskocil, C. Reigber, and P. A. Cross, 349 pp., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.

  12. Dragert, H., R. D. Hyndman, G. C. Rogers, and K. Wang, Current deformation and the width of the seismogenic zone of the northern Cascadia subduction thrust, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 653–668, 1994.

  13. Dragert, H., X. Chen, and J. Kouba, GPS monitoring of crustal strain in Southwest British Columbia with the Western Canada Deformation Array, Geomatica, 49, 301–313, 1995.

  14. Flück, P., R. D. Hyndman, and K. Wang, Three-dimensional dislocation model for great earthquakes of the Cascadia subduction zone, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 20,539–20,550, 1997.

  15. Harris, R. N. and D. S. Chapman, A comparison of mechanical thickness estimates from trough and seamount loading in the southeastern Gulf of Alaska, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 9297–9317, 1994.

  16. Henton, J. A., GPS Studies of Crustal Deformation in the Northern Cascadia Subduction Zone, Ph.D. thesis, University of Victoria, 169 pp., British Columbia, 2000.

  17. Henton, J. A., H. Dragert, R. D. Hyndman, and K. Wang, Geogetic monitoring of crustal deformation and strain on Vancouver Island (abstract), Eos Trans. AGU, 80, Fall meeting suppl, F276, 1999.

  18. Hyndman, R. D. and K. Wang, Thermal constraints on the zone of major thrust earthquake failure, The Cascadia subduction zone, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 2039–2060, 1993.

  19. Hyndman, R. D. and K. Wang, Current deformation and thermal constraints on the zone of potential great earthquakes on the Cascadia subduction thrust, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 22,133–22,154, 1995.

  20. James, T. S., J. J. Clague, K. Wang, and I. Hutchinson, Postglacial rebound at the northern Cascadia subduction zone, Quat. Sci. Rev., 19, 1527–1541, 2000.

  21. Khazaradze, G., A. Qamar, and H. Dragert, Tectonic deformation in western Washington from continuous GPS measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3153–3156, 1999.

  22. Lewis, T., Heat flux in the Canadian Cordillera, in Neotectonics of North America, edited by D. B. Slemmons, E. R. Engdahl, M. D. Zoback, and D. D. Blackwell, 498 pp., Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado, 1991.

  23. Liang, G. P., Finite element program generator and finite element language, in Reliability and Robustness of Engineering Software II, edited by C. A. Brebbia and A. J. Ferrante, 385 pp., Computational Mechanics Publications, London, 1991.

  24. McCaffrey, R., M. D. Long, C. Goldfinger, P. C. Zwick, J. L. Nabelek, C. K. Johnson, and C. Smith, Rotation and plate coupling along the southern Cascadia subduction zone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 3117–3120, 2000.

  25. Melosh, H. J. and A. Raefsky, A simple and efficient method for introducing faults intofinite element computations, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 71, 1391–1400, 1981.

  26. Miller, M. M., D. J. Johnson, C. M. Rubin, H. Dragert, K. Wang, A. Qamar, and C. Goldfinger, GPS-determination of along-strike variation in Cascadia margin kinematics: Implications for relative plate motion, subduction zone coupling, and permanent deformation, Tectonics, 2001 (in press).

  27. Miyashita, K., A model of plate convergence in Southwest Japan, inferred from levelling data associated with the 1946 Nankaido earthquake, J. Phys. Earth, 35, 449–467, 1987.

  28. Murray, M. H. and M. Lisowski, Strain accumulation along the Cascadia subduction zone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 3631–3634, 2000.

  29. Peacock, S. M., Fluid processes in subduction zones, Science, 248, 329–337, 1990.

  30. Peltier, W. R., The impulse response of a Maxwell Earth, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 12, 649–668, 1974.

  31. Pezzopane, S. K. and R. J. Weldon, II, Tectonic role of active faulting in central Oregon, Tectonics, 12, 1140–1169, 1993.

  32. Riddihough, R., Recent movements of the Juan de Fuca plate system, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 6980–6994, 1984.

  33. Satake, K., K. Shimazaki, Y. Tsuji, and K. Ueda, Time and size of a giant earthquakeinCascadia inferred from Japanese tsunami recordsofJanuary 1700, Nature, 378, 246–249, 1996.

  34. Savage, J. C., A dislocation model of strain accumulation and release at a subduction zone, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 4984–4996, 1983.

  35. Savage, J. C., Comment on “The stress state implied by dislocation models of subduction deformation” by J. J. Douglass and B. A. Buffett, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 2709–2710, 1996.

  36. Savage, J. C., M. Lisowski, and W. H. Prescott, Strain accumulation in western Washington, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 14,493–14,507, 1991.

  37. Savage, J. C., J. L. Svarc, W. H. Prescott, and M. H. Murray, Deformation across the forearc of the Cascadia subduction zone at Cape Blanco, Oregon, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 3095–3120, 2000.

  38. Stuart, W. D., Forecast model for great earthquakes at the Nankai Trough subduction zone, Pure Appl. Geophys., 126, 619–641, 1988.

  39. Taylor, M. A., G. Zheng, J. R. Rice, W. D. Stuart, and R. Dmowska, Cyclic stressing and seismicityatstrongly coupled subductionzones, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 8363–8381, 1996.

  40. Thatcher, W., The earthquake deformation cycle at the Nankai Trough, Southwest Japan, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 3087–3101, 1984.

  41. Thatcher, W. and J. B. Rundle, A viscoelastic coupling model for the cyclic deformation due to periodically repeated earth quakes at subduction zones, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 7631–7640, 1984.

  42. Wang, K., Simplified analysis of horizontal stresses in a buttressed forearc sliver at an oblique subduction zone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 2021–2024, 1996.

  43. Wang, K., Stress-strain “paradox”, plate coupling, and forearc seismicity at the Cascadia and Nankai subduction zones, Tectonophys., 319, 321–338, 2000.

  44. Wang, K. and J. He, Mechanics of low-stress forearcs: Nankai and Cascadia, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 15,191–15,205, 1999.

  45. Wang, K. and K. Suyehiro, How does plate coupling affect crustal stresses in Northeast and Southwest Japan?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2307–2310, 1999.

  46. Wang, K., H. Dragert, and H. J. Melosh, Finite element study of uplift and strain across Vancouver Island, Can. J. Earth Sci., 31, 1510–1522, 1994.

  47. Wang, K., T. Mulder, G. C. Rogers, and R. D. Hyndman, Case for very low coupling stress on the Cascadia subduction fault, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 12,907–12,918, 1995.

  48. Wells, R. E., C. S. Weaver, and R. J. Blakely, Forearc migration in Cascadia and its neotectonic significance, Geology, 26, 759–762, 1998.

  49. Wilson, D. S., Confidence intervals for motion and deformation of the Juan de Fuca plate, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 16,053–16,071, 1993.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Kelin Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, K., He, J., Dragert, H. et al. Three-dimensional viscoelastic interseismic deformation model for the Cascadia subduction zone. Earth Planet Sp 53, 295–306 (2001) doi:10.1186/BF03352386

Download citation

Keywords

  • Global Position System
  • Great Earthquake
  • Viscoelastic Model
  • Plate Convergence
  • Cascadia Subduction Zone