- Open Access
2-day, 3-day, and 5-6-day oscillations of the geomagnetic field detected by principal component analysis
Earth, Planets and Space volume 54, pages 379–392 (2002)
The day-to-day variation of the geomagnetic daily variation has been examined using hourly data of the Z component at Chichijima (geographic 27.15°N, 142.30°E; geomagnetic 18.11°N) in the northwestern Pacific Ocean. Principal component analysis is applied to the data from 1970 to 1992, and 2-day, 3-day, and 5-6-day oscillations were extracted from the day-to-day variation of the daily profile. The temporal variations of both the waveform and amplitude of each oscillation were clarified. The fluctuation associated with any of these oscillations is confined to the sunlit hours, which infers the oscillations are originated from ionospheric currents. Although the amplitudes of the oscillations are variable, they seem to be present almost continuously. Each oscillation is expressed primarily by the periodic increase and decrease of the amplitude of the quiet time daily variation, and the deviation from the normal level statistically amounts to 12% (3-day oscillation), 15% (5–cillation), and 17% (2-day oscillation) of the mean amplitude of the daily variation. There are cases, however, for which the magnitude is considerably amplified during a short duration. There also exist the oscillations that show the three periods in the pattern of the daily variation as well as in intensity. The result of analysis of day-to-day variations at other four stations indicates that the oscillations are phenomena having some latitudinal extent across the geomagnetic equator.
Apostolov, E. M., L. Alberca, and D. Altadill, Solar cycle and seasonal behaviour of quasi-two-and five-day oscillations in the time variations of foF2, Annali di Geofisica, 37, 187–192, 1994.
Apostolov, E. M., D. Altadill, and L. Alberca, Characteristics of quasi-2-day oscillations in the foF2 at northern middle latitudes, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 12163–12171, 1995.
Apostolov, E. M., D. Altadill, and L. Alberca, Persistence of quasi-2-day oscillations in the geomagnetic activity indices (an, as, am), J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 48, 1233–1239, 1996.
Chen, P. R., Two-day oscillation of the equatorial ionization anomaly, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 6343–6357, 1992.
Forbes, J. M. and S. Leveroni, Quasi 16-day oscillation in the ionosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 981–984, 1992.
Glass, M., J. L. Fellows, M. Massebeuf, A. Spizzichino, I. A. Lysenko, and Yu I. Portniaghin, Comparison and interpretation of the results of simultaneous wind measurements in the lower thermosphere at Garchy (France) and Obninsk (U. S. S. R.) by meteor radar technique, J. Atmos. Terr. hys., 37, 1077–1087, 1975.
Golovkov, V. P., N. Ye. Papitashvili, Yu. S. Tyupkin, and Ye. P. Kharin, Separation of geomagnetic field variations into quiet and disturbed components by the method of natural orthogonal components, Geomag. Aero., 18, 342–344, 1978.
Hasegawa, M., On the position of the focus of the geomagnetic Sqcurrent system, J. Geophys. Res., 65, 1437–1447, 1960.
Ito, R., S. Kato, and T. Tsuda, Consideration of an ionospheric wind dynamo driven by a planetary wave with a two-day period, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 48, 1–13, 1986.
Kohsiek, A., K. H. Glassmeier, and T. Hirooka, Periods of planetary waves in geomagnetic variation, Ann. Geophys., 13, 168–176, 1995.
Kohsiek, A., M. Kiefer, C. E. Meek, and A. H. Manson, Fluctuations in tides and geomagnetic variations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 889–892, 1998.
Krzanowski, W. J., Principles of Multivariate Analysis, Revised ed., Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2000.
Luo, Y. and P. R. Chen, Long period oscillations in the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly correlated with the neutral wind in the mesosphere, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 55, 1317–1323, 1993.
Meek, C. E., A. H. Manson, S. J. Franke, W. Singer, P. Hoffmann, R. R. Clark, T. Tsuda, T. Nakamura, M. Tsutsumi, M. Hagan, D. C. Fritts, J. Isler, and Yu I. Portnyagin, Global study of northern hemisphere quasi-2-day wave events in recent summers near 90 km altitude, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 58, 1401–1411, 1996.
Pancheva, D., L. F. Alberca, and B. A. de la Morena, Simultaneous observation of the quasi-two-day variations in the lower and upper ionosphere over Europe, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 56, 43–50, 1994.
Parish, H. F., J. M. Forbes, and F. Kamalabadi, Planetary wave and solar emission signatures in the equatorial electrojet, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 355–368, 1994.
Parkinson, W. D., Bi-diurnal geomagnetic variations, Ann. Geophys., 38, 327–329, 1982.
Philips, A. and B. H. Briggs, The day-to-day variability of upper atmosphere tidal winds and dynamo currents, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 53, 39–47, 1991.
Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN, The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1992.
Rajaram, M., Method of natural orthogonal components applied to equatorial geomagnetic variations, Annls. Geophys., 36, 599–603, 1980.
Rodgers, C. D. and A. J. Prata, Evidence for a traveling two-day wave in the middle atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 9661–9664, 1981.
Suzuki, A., UT and day-to-day variations in equivalent current systems for world geomagnetic variations, J. Geomag. Geoelectr, 31, 21–46, 1979.
Takeda, M. and Y. Yamada, Quasi two-day period variation of the geomagnetic field, J. Geomag. Geoelectr, 41, 469–478, 1989.
Tsuda, T., S. Kato, and R. A. Vincent, Long period wind oscillations observed by the Kyoto meteor radar and comparison of the quasi-2-day wave with Adelaide HF radar observations, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 50, 225–230, 1988.
Vertlib, A. B. and C.-U. Wagner, Analysis of geomagnetic Sqvariations by the expansion of fields in natural orthogonal components, 1. Method and problems, Geomag. Aero., 10, 509–513, 1970.
World Data Center for Geomagnetism, Kyoto, DATA CATALOGUE,No. 25, Kyoto Univ., 1999.
Xu, W.-Y., On Sqand Lcurrent systems in the ionosphere, PAGEOPH, 131, 515–525, 1989.
About this article
Cite this article
Yamada, Y. 2-day, 3-day, and 5-6-day oscillations of the geomagnetic field detected by principal component analysis. Earth Planet Sp 54, 379–392 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352427
- Daily Variation
- Planetary Wave
- Middle Atmosphere
- Geomagnetic Variation
- Ionospheric Current