- Open Access
Scale similarity of MHD turbulence in the Earth’s core
Earth, Planets and Space volume 56, pages 599–605 (2004)
Turbulent motions in the core, being highly anisotropic because of the influence of the Earth’s rotation and its magnetic field, cause the eddy diffusion of large-scale fields much more effectively than the molecular diffusion. Reliable estimates of the eddy diffusivities, or the subgrid-scale fluxes, are therefore of significance. In this paper, scale similarity of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence in a rapidly rotating system is investigated to model subgrid-scale processes, as used in large-eddy simulations. The turbulent flux has been computed by taking an ensemble average of results of direct numerical simulations, which are to be employed in this paper, over the computational box which represents a small region in the Earth’s core. The anisotropy of turbulent flux computed after averaging over segments into which the box is divided remains unchanged even when the size of segments changes. Dependence of turbulent flux computed from fields to which a spatial filter is applied on its width indicates that subgrid-scale flux can be evaluated through extrapolation. This method will be useful for performing global geodynamo simulations taking into account subgrid-scale processes.
Bardina, J., J. H. Ferziger, and W. C. Reynolds, Improved subgrid scale models for large-eddy simulations, Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut., Paper 80-1357, 1980.
Braginsky, S. I. and V. P. Meytlis, Local turbulence in the Earth’s core, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynam., 55, 71–87, 1990.
Buffett, B. A., A comparison of subgrid-scale models for large-eddy simulations of convection in the Earth’s core, Geophys. J. Int., 153, 753–765, 2003.
Christensen, U., P. Olson, and G. A. Glatzmaier, Numerical modelling of the geodynamo: a systematic parameter study, Geophys. J. Int., 138, 393–409, 1999.
Christensen, U. R., J. Aubert, P. Cardin, E. Dormy, S. Gibbons, G. A. Glatzmaier, E. Grote, Y. Honkura, C. Jones, M. Kono, M. Matsushima, A. Sakuraba, F. Takahashi, A. Tilgner, J. Wicht, and K. Zhang, A numerical dynamo benchmark, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 128, 25–34, 2001.
Domaradzki, J. A. and K.-C. Loh, The subgrid-scale estimation model in the physical space representation, Phys. Fluids, 11, 2330–2342, 1999.
Domaradzki, J. A. and E. M. Saiki, A subgrid-scale model based on the estimation of unresolved scales of turbulence, Phys. Fluids, 9, 2148–2164, 1997.
Germano, M., A proposal for a redefinition of the turbulent stresses in the filtered Navier-Stokes equations, Phys. Fluids, 29, 2323–2324, 1986.
Glatzmaier, G. A. and P. H. Roberts, A three-dimensional self-consistent computer simulation of a geomagnetic field reversal, Nature, 377, 203–209, 1995a.
Glatzmaier, G. A. and P. H. Roberts, A three-dimensional convective dynamo solution with rotating and finitely conducting inner core and mantle, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 91, 63–75, 1995b.
Horiuti, K., A new dynamic two-parameter mixed model for large-eddy simulation, Phys. Fluids, 9, 3443–3464, 1997.
Kageyama, A. and T. Sato, Generation mechanism of a dipole field by a magnetohydrodynamic dynamo, Phys. Rev. E, 55, 4617–4626, 1997.
Kageyama, A., T. Sato, and the Complexity Simulation Group, Computer simulation of a magnetohydrodynamic dynamo. II, Phys. Plasmas, 2, 1421–1431, 1995.
Kono, M. and P. H. Roberts, Recent geodynamo simulations and observations of the geomagnetic field, Rev. Geophys., 40, 1013, doi:10.1029/2000RG000102, 2002.
Matsushima, M., Expression of turbulent heat flux in the Earth’s core in terms of a second moment closure model, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 128, 137–148, 2001.
Matsushima, M., T. Nakajima, and P. H. Roberts, The anisotropy of local turbulence in the Earth’s core, Earth Planets Space, 51, 277–286, 1999.
Olson, P., U. Christensen, and G. A. Glatzmaier, Numerical modeling of the geodynamo: Mechanisms of field generation and equilibration, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 10,383–10,404, 1999.
Phillips, C. G. and D. J. Ivers, Spherical anisotropic diffusion models for the Earth’s core, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 117, 209–223, 2000.
Phillips, C. G. and D. J. Ivers, Spherical interactions of rapidly-rotating anisotropic turbulent viscous and thermal diffusion in the Earth’s core, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 128, 93–107, 2001.
Phillips, C. G. and D. J. Ivers, Strong field anisotropic diffusion models for the Earth’s core, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 140, 13–28, 2003.
Roberts, P. H. and G. A. Glatzmaier, Geodynamo theory and simulations, Rev. Mod. Phys., 72, 1081–1123, 2000.
St. Pierre, M. G., On the local nature of turbulence in Earth’s outer core, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynam., 83, 293–306, 1996.
Takahashi, F., J. S. Katayama, M. Matsushima, and Y. Honkura, Effects of boundary layers on magnetic field behavior in an MHD dynamo model, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 128, 149–161, 2001.
Zhang, K. and C. A. Jones, The effect of hyperviscosity on geodynamo models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 2869–2872, 1997.
About this article
Cite this article
Matsushima, M. Scale similarity of MHD turbulence in the Earth’s core. Earth Planet Sp 56, 599–605 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352520
- MHD turbulence
- Earth’s core
- subgrid scale
- scale similarity