Skip to main content

Time-dependent earthquake hazard evaluation in seismogenic systems using mixed Markov Chains: An application to the Japan area

Abstract

A previous work introduced a new method for seismic hazard evaluation in a system (a geographic area with distinct, but related seismogenic regions) based on modeling the transition probabilities of states (patterns of presence or absence of seismicity, with magnitude greater or equal to a threshold magnitude Mr, in the regions of the system, during a time interval Δt) as a Markov chain. Application of this direct method to the Japan area gave very good results. Given that the most important limitation of the direct method is the relative scarcity of large magnitude events, we decided to explore the possibility that seismicity with magnitude MM mr contains information about the future occurrence of earthquakes with MM mr > M mr . This mixed Markov chain method estimates the probabilities of occurrence of a system state for MM Mr on the basis of the observed state for MM mr in the previous Δt. Application of the mixed method to the area of Japan gives better hazard estimations than the direct method; in particular for large earthquakes. As part of this study, the problem of performance evaluation of hazard estimation methods is addressed, leading to the use of grading functions.

References

  1. Agnew, D. D. and L. M. Jones, Prediction probabilities from foreshocks, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 11959–11971, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aki, K., A probabilistic synthesis of precursory phenomena, in Earthquake Prediction, an International Review, edited by D. W. Simpson and P. G. Richards, 680 pp., M. Ewing series, v. 4, Am. Geophys. Union, Washington, D.C., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brillinger, D., Seismic risk assessment: some statistical aspects, Earthq. Predict. Res., 1 183–195, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Epstein, B. and C. Lomnitz, A model for the occurrence of large earthquakes, Nature, 211, 954–956, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fedotov, S., Regularities of the distribution of strong earthquakes in Kamchatka, the Kurile Islands, and northeast Japan, Trudy Isnt. Fiz. Zemli. Acad. Nauk. SSSR., 36, 66–94, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldman, S., Information Theory, 385 pp., Dover Publs. Inc., USA, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gumbel, E. J., Statistics of Extremes, 375 pp., Columbia University Press, New York, N.Y., 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gutenberg, B. and C. Richter, Frequency of earthquakes in California, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 34, 185–188, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hagiwara, Y., A stochastic model of earthquake occurrence and the accompanying horizontal land deformations, Tectonophysics, 26, 91–101, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hagiwara, Y., H. Tajima, S. Izutnya, and H. Hanada, Gravity changes associated with earthquake swarm activities in the eastern part of Izu peninsula, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Tokyo Univ., 52, 141–150, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Herrera, C., Determinación de peligro sísmico mediante cadenas de Markov, MSc Thesis, CICESE, 86 p., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. International Seismological Center, On-line Bulletin, http://www.isc.ac.uk/Bull/Bull.

  13. Kagan, Y. and D. Jackson, Seismic gap hypothesis: Ten years after, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 21419–21431, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keilis-Borok, V. I. and V. G. Kossobokov, Premonitory activation of earthquake flow: algorithm M8, Phys. Earth. Planet. Int., 61, 73–83, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Knopoff, L., A stochastic model for the occurrence of main sequence earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 5745–5756, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lomnitz, C. and F. Nava, The predictive power of seismic gaps, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 73, 1815–1824, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McCann, W., S. Nishenko, L. Sykes, and J. Krause, Seismic gaps and plate tectonics: seismic potential for major boundaries, Pure Appl. Geophys., 117, 1082–1147, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mogi, K., Migration of Seismic Activity, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., 46, 53–74, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nava, F. A. and V. Espíndola, Seismic hazard assessment through semi-stochastic simulation, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 83, 450–468, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nava, F. A., C. Herrera, J. Frez, and E. Glowacka, Seismic hazard evaluation using Markov chains; Application to the Japan area, Pure Appl. Geophys., 162, 1347–1366, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Patwardhan, A. S., R. B. Kulkarni, and D. Tocher, A semi Markov model for characterizing recurrence of great earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 70, 323–347, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reid, H. F., The mechanism of the earthquake, The California earthquake of April 18, 1906, Report of the Research Senatorial Commission, Carnegie Institution, Washington D.C., 2, 16–18, 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Richter, C., Elementary Seismology, 521 pp., W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shimazaki, K. and T. Nakata, Time predictable recurrence model for large earthquakes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 7, 279–282, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsapanos, T. and A. A. Papadopoulou, A discrete Markov Model for earthquake occurrences in Southern Alaska and Aleutian Islands, J. Balkan Geophys. Soc., 2(3), 75–83, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vere-Jones, D., A Markov model for aftershock occurrence, Pure Appl. Geophys., 64, 31–42, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yong, S. and Z. Wai, The correlation between random variation and Earth solid tide Change in Rock-Groundwater system-the Mechanical Foundation for Using Change to predict Earthquake, J. Earthq. Predict. Res., 4, 3–15, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Herrera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herrera, C., Nava, F.A. & Lomnitz, C. Time-dependent earthquake hazard evaluation in seismogenic systems using mixed Markov Chains: An application to the Japan area. Earth Planet Sp 58, 973–979 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352602

Download citation

Key words

  • Earthquake Hazard
  • Markov Chains
  • seismic catalog