Skip to main content

Deviation of linear relation between streaming potential and pore fluid pressure difference in granular material at relatively high Reynolds numbers

Abstract

We conducted streaming potential measurements on the packing of glass beads, and investigated the deviation of streaming potential from the Helmholtz-Smoluchowski (H-S) equation. The H-S equation was originally derived on the assumption of laminar flows. Studies using a capillary have shown that the H-S equation is valid for turbulent flows in so far as the viscous sublayer is thicker than the electrical double layer and the entrance effect is negligible. Although the streaming potential in porous media has been reported to deviate from the H-S equation for turbulent flows, its mechanism is still poorly understood. We measured the fluid flux and the streaming potential as a function of the pore fluid pressure difference. The fluid flux begins to deviate from Darcy’s law at Reynolds number >3, and the streaming potential begins to deviate from the linear relation at larger Reynolds numbers. When the flow is fast, the fluid inertia separates the boundary layer from the solid surface and induces the counter flows. The fluid in the counter-flow region is separated from the circulating fluid, and ions there cannot contribute to the convection current. We think that this results in a lower streaming potential than expected from the H-S equation.

References

  1. Batchelor, G. K., An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernabé, Y., Streaming potential in heterogeneous networks, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 20827–20841, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernabé, Y. and A. Revil, Pore-scale heterogeneity, energy dissipation and the transport properties of rocks, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 1529–1532, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bocquet, P. E., C. M. Sliepcevich, and D. F. Bohr, Effect of turbulence on the streaming potential, Ind. Eng. Chem., 48, 197–200, 1956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brož, Z. and N. Epstein, Electrokinetic flow through porous media composed of fine cylindrical capillaries, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 56, 605–612, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guéguen, Y. and V. Palciauskas, Introduction to the Physics of Rocks, Princeton University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hashimoto, T. and Y. Tanaka, A large self-potential anomaly on Unzen volcano, Shimabara peninsula, Kyushu island, Japan, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 191–194, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishido, T. and H. Mizutani, Experimental and theoretical basis of electrokinetic phenomena in rock-water systems and its applications to geophysics, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 1763–1775, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jednačak, J., V. Paravdić, and W. Haller, The electrokinetic potential of glasses in aqueous electrolyte solutions, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 49, 16–23, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson, D. L., J. Koplik, and L. M. Schwartz, New pore-size parameter characterizing transport in porous media, Phys. Rev. Lett., 57, 2564–2567, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jouniaux, L. and J.-P. Pozzi, Permeability dependence of streaming potential in rocks for various fluid conductivities, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 485–488, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kurtz, R. J., E. Findl, Al B. Kurtz, and L. C. Stormo, Turbulent flow streaming potentials in large bore tubing, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 57, 28–39, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Landau, L. D. and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid mechanics, 2nd edn., Pergamon Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lorne, B., F. Perrier, and J.-P. Avouac, Streaming potential measurements, 1. properties of the electrical double layer from crushed rock samples, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 17857–17877, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Revil, A., the hydroelectric problem of porous rocks: thermodynamic approach and introduction of a percolation threshold, Geophys. J. Int., 151, 944–949, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Revil, A. and P.W. J. Glover, Theory of ionic-surface electrical conduction in porous media, Phys. Rev. B., 55, 1757–1773, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Revil, A. and P. W. J. Glover, Nature of surface electrical conductivity in natural sands, sandstones, and clays, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 691–694, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Revil, A. and P. A. Pezard, Streaming electrical potential anomaly along faults in geothermal areas, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 3197–3200, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Revil, A., L. M. Cathles III, S. Losh, and J. A. Nunn, Electrical conductivity in shaly sands with geophysical applications, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 23925–23936, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rutgers, A. J., M. de Smet, and G. de Myer, Influence of turbulence upon electrokinetic phenomena, Trans. Faraday Soc., 53, 393–396, 1957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Scheidegger, A. E., The Physics of Flow through Porous Media, The Macmillan Company, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shaw, D. J., Introduction to Colloid and Surface Chemistry, 3rd edn., Butterworths, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stewart, P. R. and N. Street, Streaming potential and turbulence, J. Colloid. Sci., 16, 192–194, 1961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tuman, V. S., Streaming potential at very high differential pressures, J. Appl. Phys., 34, 2014–2019, 1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Turcotte, D. L. and G. Schubert, Geodynamics-Applications of Continuum Physics to Geological Problems, John Wiley and Sons, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wong, P.-Z., Conductivity, permeability, and electrokinetics, in Methods in the Physics of Porous Media, edited by P.-Z. Wong, Academic Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tohru Watanabe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watanabe, T., Katagishi, Y. Deviation of linear relation between streaming potential and pore fluid pressure difference in granular material at relatively high Reynolds numbers. Earth Planet Sp 58, 1045–1051 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352609

Download citation

Key words

  • Streaming potential
  • Helmholtz-Smoluchowski eauation
  • turbulent flow
  • Reynolds number