- Open Access
Effects of the site distribution and the prior information on the inverted geomagnetic field model: a case study applying the ABIC method to the synthetic datasets
Earth, Planets and Space volume 59, pages703–709(2007)
When we use stochastic inversion and Bayesian modelling in order to obtain geomagnetic field models from paleomagnetic data, there are two major factors controlling the solution: determination of the hyperparameter and the type of the smoothing constraint on the model. To investigate contributions of the factors, we calculated some patterns of inversions from synthetic datasets from ideal and real site distributions. The ABIC (Akaike’s Bayesian Information Criteria) minimization method was used to determine the hyperparameter, and then the relationship between the hyperparameter and the ABIC index was demonstrated. Using results of an inversion of synthetic datasets with errors, the most suitable hyperparameters were found for each site distribution, and the good and stable solutions were obtained. However, when number of the sites is few or coverage of the site distribution is not uniform, it is found that the solution is not clearly determined. Moreover, it seems that the solution does not significantly depend on the type of the model constraint.
Akaike, H., Likelihood and the Bayes procedure, in Bayesian Statistics, edited by J. M. Bernardo, M. H. DeGroot, D. V. Lindley, and A. F. M. Smith, University Press, Valencia, 143–166, 1980.
Bloxham, J. and D. Gubbins, The secular variation of Earth’s magnetic field, Nature, 317, 777–781, 1985.
Bloxham, J. and A. Jackson, Time-dependent mapping of the magnetic field at the core-mantle boundary, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 19537–19563, 1992.
Bloxham, J., D. Gubbins, and A. Jackson, Geomagnetic secular variation, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A., 329, 415–502, 1989.
Constable, C. G. and R. L. Parker, Statistics of the geomagnetic secular variation for the past 5 m.y., J. Geophys. Res., 93, 11569–11581, 1988.
Constable, C. G., C. L. Johnson, and S. P. Lund, Global geomagnetic field models for the past 3000 years: transient or permanent flux lobes?, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 358, 991–1008, 2000.
Fukahata, Y., Y. Yagi, and M. Matsu’ura, Waveform Inversion for seismic source processes using ABIC with two sorts of prior constraints: Comparison between proper and improper formulations, Geophys. R. Lett., 30, 1–4, doi:10.1029/2002GL016293, 2003.
Gubbins, D., Geomagnetic field analysis - I. stochastic inversion, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 73, 641–652, 1983.
Gubbins, D., Geomagnetic field analysis - II. secular variation consistent with the perfectly conducting core, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 77, 753–766, 1984.
Gubbins, D. and J. Bloxham, Geomagnetic field analysis - III. Magnetic fields on the core-mantle boundary, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 80, 695–713, 1985.
Gubbins, D. and P. Kelly, Persistent patterns in the geomagnetic field over the past 2.5 Myr, Nature, 365, 829–832, 1993.
Hatakeyama, T. and M. Kono, Geomagnetic field model for the last 5 My: time-averaged field and secular variation, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 133, 181–215, 2002.
Hongre, L., G. Hulot, and A. Khokhlov, An analysis of the geomagnetic field over the past 2000 years, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 106, 311–335, 1998.
Jackson D. D., The use of a priori data to resolve non-uniqueness in linear inversion, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 57, 137–157, 1979.
Jackson, D. D. and M. Matsu’ura, A Bayesian approach to nonlinear inversion, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 581–591, 1985.
Jackson, A., A. R. T. Jonkers, and M. Walker, Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 358, 957–990, 2000.
Johnson, C. L. and C. G. Constable, The time-averaged geomagnetic field as recorded by lava flows over the past 5 Myr, Geophys. J. Int., 122, 488–519, 1995.
Johnson, C. L. and C. G. Constable, The time-averaged geomagnetic field: global and regional biases for 0–5 Ma, Geophys. J. Int., 131, 643–666, 1997.
Johnson, C. L., C. G. Constable, and L. Tauxe, Mapping long-term changes in Earth’s magnetic field., Science, 300, 2044–2045, doi:20.1126.science.1032007, 2003.
Kelly, P. and D. Gubbins, The geomagnetic field over the past 5 Myr, Geophys. J. Int., 128, 315–330, 1997.
Kono, M., Uniqueness problems in the spherical harmonic analysis of the geomagnetic field direction data, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 28, 11–29, 1976.
Korte, M. and C. G. Constable, Continuous global geomagnetic field models for the past 3000 years, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 140, 73–89, doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2003.07.013, 2003.
Korte, M. and C. G. Constable, Continuous geomagnetic field models for the past 7 millennia: 2. CALS7K, Geochem. Geophys. Geosys., 6, doi:10.1029/2004GC000801, 2005.
Langel, R. A. and R. H. Estes, A geomagnetic field spectrum, Geophys. R. Lett., 9, 250–253, 19
Maus, S., S. Macmillan, T. Chernova, S. Choi, D. Dater, V. Golovkov, V. Lesur, F. Lowes, H. Luhr, W. Mai, S. McLean, N. Olsen, M. Rother, T. Sabaka, A. Thomson, T. Zvereva, and International Association of Geomagnetism, Aeronomy (IAGA), Division V, Working Group VMOD, The 10th generation international geomagnetic reference field, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 151, 320–322, 2005.
Menke, W., Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory, Rev. Ed., 289 pp., Academic Press, 1989.
Mochizuki, E., Y. Yokoyama, I. Shimizu, and Y. Hamano, Spherical harmonic analysis in terms of unevenly distributed observation points and its applications to geomagnetic data, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 49, 1013–1033, 1997.
Parker, R. L., Geophysical Inverse Theory, 386 pp., Princeton Univ. Press, 1994.
Yabuki, T. and M. Matsu’ura, Geodetic data inversion using a Bayesian information criterion for spatial distribution of fault slip, Geophys. J. Int., 109, 363–375, 1992.
About this article
Cite this article
Hatakeyama, T. Effects of the site distribution and the prior information on the inverted geomagnetic field model: a case study applying the ABIC method to the synthetic datasets. Earth Planet Sp 59, 703–709 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352733
- Geomagnetic field