Skip to main content


We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.

Further K-Ar dating and paleomagnetic study of the Auckland geomagnetic excursions


Three different excursional paleomagnetic directions were reported from eight volcanoes of the Auckland volcanic field in New Zealand: north-down (ND) directions obtained from five volcanoes, west-up (WU) from two volcanoes, and south-up (SU) from one volcano. K-Ar ages have been reported for two of these volcanoes: 27±5 (1σ) ka for the Wiri volcano of the ND group and 55±5 ka for the Hampton Park volcano of the WU group. In the present study, we have carried out further K-Ar age determinations on three other volcanoes and obtained reliable ages for two of them: 30±5 ka for the Puketutu volcano of the ND group and 50±6 ka for the McLennan Hills volcano of the SU group. The age of Puketutu agrees well with that of Wiri, and these two ages give a weighted mean age of 29±3 (1σ) ka for the ND group. The age of the ND group is distinguishable from those of the SU and WU groups at the 2σ level, confirming that excursions occurred at two different times separated by a few tens of thousands of years. The age of the SU group is indistinguishable from that of the WU group, and a weighted mean age of 53±4 ka can be calculated for this combined group (SU-WU group). The age of the ND group and that of the SU-WU group are distinguishable from the latest age estimate of the Laschamp excursion. Overall, these age data from volcanic rocks show that at least three excursions occurred between approximately 30 and 60 ka. These three excursions are likely to be confined in the weak dipole interval of 20–70 ka, and all of these excursions yield particularly low virtual dipole moments (VDMs) of 2×1022 A m2 or less. Since it is suggested that the larger virtual geomagnetic pole (VGP) deviations from the geographic pole are related to the lower VDMs, the excursional fields possibly have resulted from a significantly reduced dipole field and comparable non-dipole components.


  1. Allen, S. R. and I. E. M. Smith, Eruption styles and volcanic hazard in the Auckland volcanic Field, New Zealand, Geosci. Repts. Shizuoka Univ., 20, 5–14, 1994.

  2. Barbetti, M. F. and M. W. McElhinny, The Lake Mungo geomagnetic excursion, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 281, 515–542, 1976.

  3. Benson, L., J. Liddicoat, J. Smoot, A. Sarna-Wojcicki, R. Negrini, and S. Lund, Age of the Mono Lake excursion and associated tephra, Quat. Sci. Rev., 22, 135–140, 2003.

  4. Bonhommet, N. and J. Zähringer, Paleomagmetsim and potassium argon age determinations of the Laschamp geomagnetic polarity event, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 6, 43–46, 1969.

  5. Blanchet, C., N. Thouveny, and T. Garidel-Thoron, Evidence for multiple paleomagnetic intensity lows between 30 and 50 ka BP from a western Equatorial Pacific sedimentary sequence, Quat. Sci. Rev., 25, 1039–1052, 2006.

  6. Cassidy, J., Geomagnetic excursion captured by multiple volcanoes in a monogenetic field, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L21310, doi:10.1029/2006GL027284, 2006.

  7. Carvallo, C., P. Camps, G. Ruffet, B. Henry, and T. Poidras, Mono Lake or Laschamp geomagnetic excursion event recorded from lava flows in Amsterdam Island (southern Indian Ocean), Geophys. J. Int., 154, 767–782, 2003.

  8. Chauvin, A., R. A. Duncan, N. Bonhommet, and S. Levi, Paleointensity of the earth’s magnetic field and K-Ar dating of the Louchadiere volcanic flow (Central France). New evidence for the Laschamp excursion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 16, 1189–1192, 1989.

  9. Dalrymple, G. B. and M. A. Lanphere, Potassium-Argon Dating, 258 pp., San Francisco, 1969.

  10. Denham, C. R. and A. Cox, Evidence that the Laschamp polarity event did not occur 13,300–30,400 years ago, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 13, 181–190, 1971.

  11. Grant-Taylor, T. L. and T. A. Rafter, New Zealand Radiocarbon age measurements—6, N. Z. J. Geol. Geophys., 14, 364–402, 1971.

  12. Gratton, N. M, J. Shaw, and E. Herrero-Bervera, An absolute palaeointensity record from SOH1 lava core, Hawaii using the microwave technique, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 148, 193–214, 2005.

  13. Guillou, H., B. S. Singer, C. Laj, C. Kissel, S. Scaillet, and B. R. Jicha, On the age of the Laschamp geomagnetic excursion, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 227, 331–343, 2004.

  14. Itaya, T. and K. Nagao, K-Ar age determination of volcanic rocks younger than 1 Ma, Mem. Soc. Geol. Jpn., 29, 143–161, 1988 (in Japanese with English abstract).

  15. Juarez, M. T. and L. Tauxe, The intensity of the time-averaged geomagnetic field: the last 5 Myr, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 175, 169–180, 2000.

  16. Kent, D. V., S. R. Hemming, and B. D. Turrin, Laschamp Excursion at Mono Lake?, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 197, 151–164, 2002.

  17. Kermode, L. O., Geology of the Auckland urban area, Scale 1:50 000, Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences geological map 2, 63 pp., 1 map, Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Ltd, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, 1992.

  18. Laj, C. and C. Kissel, Geomagnetic field intensity at Hawaii for the last 420 kyr from the Hawaii Scientific Drilling Project core, Big Island, Hawaii, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 15317–15338, 1999.

  19. Laj, C., C. Kissel, V. Scao, J. Beer, D. M. Thomas, H. Guillou, R. Muscheler, and G. Wagner, Geomagnetic intensity and inclination variations at Hawaii for the past 98 kyr from core SOH-4 (Big Island): a new study and a comparison with existing contemporary data, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 129, 205–243, 2002.

  20. Laj, C., C. Kissel, and A. P. Roberts, Geomagnetic field behavior during the Iceland Basin and Laschamp geomagnetic excursions: A simple transitional field geometry?, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 7, Q03004, doi:10.1029/2005GC001122, 2006.

  21. Levi, S., H. Audunsson, R. A. Duncan, L. Kristjansson, P.-Y. Gillot, and S. P. Jakobsson, Late Pleistocene geomagnetic excursion in Icelandic lavas: confirmation of the Laschamp geomagnetic excursion, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 96, 443–457, 1990.

  22. Mankinen, E. A. and D. E. Champion, Latest Pleistocene and Holocene geomagnetic paleointensity on Hawaii, Science, 262, 412–416, 1993.

  23. Mankinen, E. A. and C. M. Wentworth, Mono Lake excursion recorded in sediment of the Santa Clara Valley, Calfornia, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 5, Q02H05, doi:10.1029/2003GC000592, 2004.

  24. Marshall, M., A. Chauvin, N. Bonhommet, Preliminary paleointensity measurements and detailed magnetic analyses of basalts from the Skalamaelifell excursion, southwest Iceland, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 11681–11698, 1988.

  25. Matsumoto, A., Improvement for determination of potassium in K-Ar dating, Bull. Geol. Surv. Jpn., 40, 65–70, 1989 (in Japanese with English abstract).

  26. Matsumoto, A., K. Uto, and K. Shibata, K-Ar dating by peak comparison method: new technique applicable to rocks younger than 0.5 Ma, Bull. Geol. Surv. Jpn., 40, 565–557, 1989a.

  27. Matsumoto, A., K. Uto, and K. Shibata, Argon Isotopic Ratios in Histric Lavas—importance of correction for the initial argon in K-Ar dating of young volcanic rocks, Mass Spectr., 37, 353–363, 1989b (in Japanese with English abstract).

  28. McDougall, I., H. A. Polach, and J. J. Stipp, Excess radiogenic argon in young suaerial basalts from the Auckland volcanic field, New Zealand, Geochim. Coschim. Acta, 33, 1485–1520, 1969.

  29. Merrill, R. T. and P. L. McFadden, The use of magnetic field excursions in stratigraphy, Quat. Res., 63, 232–237, 2005.

  30. Mochizuki, N., H. Tsunakawa, H. Shibuya, T. Tagami, A. Ozawa, J. Cassidy, and I. E. M. Smith, K-Ar ages of the Auckland geomagnetic excursions, Earth Planet. Space, 56, 283–288, 2004a.

  31. Mochizuki, N., H. Tsunakawa, Y. Oishi, S. Wakai, K. Wakabayashi, and Y. Yamamoto, Palaeointensity study of the Oshima 1986 lava in Japan: implications for the reliability of the Thellier and LTD-DHT Shaw method, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 146, 395–416, 2004b.

  32. Mochizuki, N., H. Tsunakawa, H. Shibuya, J. Cassidy, and I. E. M. Smith, Palaeointensities of the Auckland geomagnetic excursions by the LTD DHT Shaw method, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 154, 168–179, 2006.

  33. Oda, H., M. J. Dekkers, C. G. Langereis, L. Lourens, and D. Heslop, A paleomagnetic record of the last 640 kyr from an eastern Medieterranean piston core and a review of geomagnetic excursions in the Brunhes, EOS Trans. AGU, 85, GP41B–08 (Abstract), 2004.

  34. Oishi, Y., H. Tsunakawa, N. Mochizuki, Y. Yamamoto, K. Wakabayashi, and H. Shibuya, Validity of the LTD-DHT Shaw method and Thellier palaeointensity methods: a case study of the Kilauea 1970 lava, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 149, 243–257, 2005.

  35. Ozawa, A., T. Tagami, and H. Kamata, Ar isotopic composition of some Hawai’ian historical lavas, Chem. Geol., 226, 66–72, 2006.

  36. Perrin, M. and E. Schnepp, IAGA paleointensity database: distribution and quality of the data set, Phys. Earth Plant. Inter., 147, 255–267, 2004.

  37. Polach, H. A., J. Chappell, and J. F. Lovering, ANU radiocarbon date list III, Radiocarbon, 11, 245–262, 1969.

  38. Roperch, P., N. Bonhommet, and S. Levi, Paleointensity of the earth’s magnetic field during the Laschamp excursion and its geomagnetic implications, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 88, 209–219, 1988.

  39. Shane, P., Maar drilling provides new insights into late Quaternary volcanism and paleoclimate in Auckland (Abstracts), GSNZ Annual Conference Northland 2002, Geol. Soc. N.Z. Misc. Publ., 112A, 50, 2002.

  40. Shibuya, H., J. Cassidy, I. E. M. Smith, and T. Itaya, A geomagnetic excursion in the Brunhes epoch recorded in New Zealand basalts, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 111, 41–48, 1992.

  41. Smith, I. E. M., Northland, in Intraplate volcanism in eastern Australia and New Zealand, edited by R. W. Johnson, pp. 157–162, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989.

  42. Takaoka, N., K. Konno, Y. Oba, and T. Konda, K-Ar dating of lavas from Zao Volcano, Northeastern Japan, J. Geol. Soc. Jpn., 95, 157–170, 1989.

  43. Tanaka, H. and T. Kobayashi, Paleomagnetism of the late Quaternary Ontake Volcano, Japan: directions, intensities, and excursions, Earth Planet. Space, 55, 189–202, 2003.

  44. Teanby, N., C. Laj, D. Gubbins, and M. Pringle, A detailed palaeointensity and inclination record from drill core SOH1 on Hawaii, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 131, 101–140, 2002.

  45. Tsunakawa, H. and J. Shaw, The Shaw method of palaeointensity determinations and its application to recent volcanic rocks, Geophys. J. Int., 118, 781–787, 1994.

  46. Verosub, K. L. and S. K. Banerjee, Geomagnetic excursions and their paleomagnetic record, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 15, 145–155, 1977.

  47. Watkins, N. D. and J. Nougier, Excursions and secular variation of the Brunhes epoch geomagnetic field in the Indian Ocean region, J. Geophys. Res., 78, 6060–6068, 1973.

  48. Yamamoto, Y. and H. Tsunakawa, Geomagnetic field intensity during the last 5 Myr: LTD-DHT Shaw palaeointensities from volcanic rocks of the Society Islands, French Polynesia, Geophys. J. Int., 162, 79–114, 2005.

  49. Yamamoto, Y., H. Tsunakawa, and H. Shibuya, Palaeointensity study of the Hawaiian 1960 lava: implications for possible causes of erroneously high intensities, Geophys. J. Int., 153, 263–276, 2003.

  50. Zimmerman, S., S. R. Hemming, D. V. Kent, and S. Y. Searle, Revised chronology for late Pleistocene Mono Lake sediments based on paleointensity correlation to the global reference curve, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 252, 94–106, 2006.

Download references

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mochizuki, N., Tsunakawa, H., Shibuya, H. et al. Further K-Ar dating and paleomagnetic study of the Auckland geomagnetic excursions. Earth Planet Sp 59, 755–761 (2007).

Download citation

Key words

  • K-Ar age
  • paleointensity
  • Auckland volcanic field
  • Auckland excursion
  • Laschamp excursion
  • MonoLake excursion