Skip to main content

Advertisement

We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.

Geomagnetic 100-ky variation extracted from paleointensity records of the equatorial and North Pacific sediments

Abstract

We have analyzed three sets of paleointensity series varying in duration from 300 to 1600 ka to confirm the existence of paleosecular variation on a 100-ky time scale. The data series are from sediment cores in the equatorial and North Pacific regions. We transformed the three time series into wavelet space and found characteristic variations in a 100-ky time scale. We also calculated wavelet correlation between the series of the paleointensity and rock magnetic parameters of each core to assess the efffect of rock magnetic properties on relative paleointensity. The wavelet correlation coefficients of the three cores are small, so the change in the paleointensity in each core is concluded to be independent of magnetic properties. In order to confirm the cause of the paleointensity variation, we calculated the wavelet correlation among the three cores. The relative intensity variations of the three cores are significantly correlated, while rock magnetic parameters are not, indicating that there are differences in rock magnetic variations among the cores, although they appear to occur on similar scales. On the other hand, all sets of relative paleointensity have synchronous variations. Such paleointensity variations observed over a wide area are considered to originate from changes in the Earth’s magnetic field.

References

  1. Banerjee, S. K., J. King, and J. A. Marvin, Rapid method for magnetic granulometry with applications to environmental studies, Geophys. Res. Lett., 8, 333–336, 1981.

  2. Bendat, J. S. and A. G. Piersol, Random Data, Analysis and Measurement Procedures, 566 pp., Wiley-Interscience Pub., New York, 1986.

  3. Berger, A., M. F. Loutre, and J. L. Melice, Instability of the astronomical periods from 1.5 Myr BP to 0.5 Myr AP, Paleoclimates, 2, 239–280, 1998.

  4. Bloemendal, J., J. W. King, F. R. Hall, and S.-J. Doh, Rock magnetism of Late Neogene and Pleistocene deep-sea sediments: relationship to sediment source, diagenetic processes, and sediment lithology, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 4361–4375, 1992.

  5. Channell, J. E. T., D. A. Hodell, J. McManus, and B. Lehman, Orbital modulation of the Earth’s magnetic field intensity, Nature, 394, 464–468, 1998.

  6. Chui, C. K., An Introduction to Wavelets, 266 pp., Academic, Boston, 1992.

  7. Evans, M. E. and F. Heller, Environmental Magnetism, 293 pp., Academic Press, 2003.

  8. Guyodo, Y. and J. P. Valet, Global changes in intensity in the Earth’s magnetic field during the past 800 ky, Nature, 399, 249–252, 1999.

  9. Guyodo, Y., P. Gaillot, and J. E. T. Channell, Wavelet analysis of relative geomagnetic paleointensity at ODP site 983, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 184, 109–123, 2000.

  10. Jacobs, J. A., The Earth’s Core, pp. 416, Academic Press, London, 1987.

  11. Horng, C.-S, A. P. Roberts, and W.-T. Liang, A 2.14 Myr astronomically tuned record of relative geomagnetic paleointensity from the western Philippine sea, J. Geophys. Res., 108, doi:10.1029/2001JB001698, 2003.

  12. Oppenheim, A. V. and R. W. Schafer, Digital Signal Processing, 585 pp., Prentice Hall, London, 1975.

  13. Roberts, A. P., M. Winklhofer, W.-T. Liang, and C.-S. Horng, Testing the hypothesis of orbital (eccentricity) influence on Earth’s magnetic field, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 216, 187–192, 2003.

  14. Sugiura, N., ARM, TRM and magnetic interactions: Concentration dependence, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 42, 451–455, 1979.

  15. Thouveny, N., J. Carcaillet, E. Mareno, G. Leduc, and D. Nérini, Geomagnetic moment variation and paleomagnetic excursions since 400 kyr BP: a stacked record from sedimentary sequences of the Portuguese margin, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 219, 377–396, 2004.

  16. Torrence, C. and G. Compo, A practical guide to wavelet analysis, Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc, 79, 61–78, 1998.

  17. Yamazaki, T., Relative paleointensity of the geomagnetic field during Bruhnes Chron recorded in North Pacific deep-see sediment cores: Orbital influence?, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 169, 23–25, 1999.

  18. Yamazaki, T., and N. Ioka, Cautionary note on magnetic grain-size estimation using the ratio of ARM to magnetic susceptibility, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 751–754, 1997.

  19. Yamazaki, T. and T. Kanamatsu, A relative paleointensity record of the geomagnetic field since 1.6 Ma from the North Pacific, Earth Planets Space, 59, this issue, 785–794, 2007.

  20. Yamazaki, T. and H. Oda, Orbital influence on the Earth’s magnetic field: 100-ky periodicity in inclination, Science, 295, 2435–2438, 2002.

  21. Yamazaki, T. and H. Oda, Intensity-inclination Correlation for Long-term Secular Variation of the Geomagnetic Field and its Relevance to Persistent Non-dipole Components, AGU Monogr., 145, 287–298, 2004.

  22. Yamazaki, T. and H. Oda, A geomagnetic paleointensity stack between 0.8 and 3.0 Ma from equatorial Pacific sediment cores, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 29, Q11H20, doi:10.2039/2005GC001001, 2005.

  23. Yokoyama, Y and T. Yamazaki, Geomagnetic paleointensity variation with a 100 ky quasi-period, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 181, 7–14, 2000 (Paper I).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yukiko Yokoyama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yokoyama, Y., Yamazaki, T. & Oda, H. Geomagnetic 100-ky variation extracted from paleointensity records of the equatorial and North Pacific sediments. Earth Planet Sp 59, 795–805 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352742

Download citation

Key words

  • Paleosecular variation
  • paleointensity
  • geodynamo
  • Earth’s orbit
  • excentricity
  • geomagnetic field
  • secular variation