Skip to main content

A detector telescope’s pitch angle sampling of magnetospheric particles

Abstract

A geometrical method developed for a particle detector can be extended for application to the determination of the pitch angle sampling capability of the particle telescope of any orientation and for the parent satellite of any orbital orientation. A unit vector tangent to a dipole geomagnetic field line has been calculated from the dipole magnetic field equations in the geomagnetic coordinate system. Rotation matrices have been used, step-by-step, to align the geomagnetic coordinate frame with the detector coordinate frame. The detector selected in this work has its axis tilted with the local zenith direction. The component of the unit vector in the detector coordinate system is found at an observation point characterized by longitude, latitude, and the geocentric radial distance. Pitch angles are measured with respect to the guiding field direction. The pitch angle sampling factor is used in the calculation of detector response functions to particles of different pitch angles. The sampling efficiency functions are useful to make an absolute comparison of magnetospheric particle fluxes measured by particle telescopes under different solar conditions pertaining to different epochs.

References

  • Adel, M. M., Absolute flux comparison of magnetospheric particle, Can. Astronaut. Space J., 2007 (submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovestadt, D., B. Hausler, and M. Scholer, Observation of energetic particles at very low altitudes near the geomagnetic equator, Phys. Rev. Lett., 28(20), 1340–1344, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miah, M. A., Global Zones of Particle Precipitations, Ph.D. Thesis, Louisiana State University, p. 107, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miah, M. A., The ONR-602 Experiment and investigation of particle precipitation near the equator, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 43, 445–460, 1991a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miah, M. A., Observation of Z ≥ 1 particles below 300 km near the geomagnetic equator, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 43, 461–475, 1991b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miah, M. A., Significant variation of proton population in the equatorial thermosphere, Adv. Space Res., 14(9), 229–232, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miah, M. A., J. W. Mitchell, and J. P. Wefel, Magnetospheric particle detection efficiency of a conical telescope, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., A281, 622–627, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miah, M. A., K. Nagata, T. Kohno, H. Murakami, A. Nakamoto, N. Hasebe, J. Kikuchi, and T. Doke, Spatial and temporal features of 0.64–35 MeV protons in the Space Station environment: EXOS-C observations, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 44, 591–610, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz, J., Energetic protons at low equatorial altitudes, Zeitschrift fur Geophysik, 38, 701–717, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miah M. Adel.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adel, M.M. A detector telescope’s pitch angle sampling of magnetospheric particles. Earth Planet Sp 60, 753–761 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352824

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352824

Key words