- Open Access
The intensity of the geomagnetic field in the late-Archaean: new measurements and an analysis of the updated IAGA palaeointensity database
© The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS); The Seismological Society of Japan; The Volcanological Society of Japan; The Geodetic Society of Japan; The Japanese Society for Planetary Sciences; TERRAPUB. 2009
Received: 16 October 2007
Accepted: 6 July 2008
Published: 23 January 2009
We firstly present the results of a detailed palaeointensity study performed on 54 samples from 9 volcanic units of late Archaean age (2724-2772 Ma) from the Pilbara Craton, Western Australia. These results were severely affected by magnetomineralogical alteration occurring during the laboratory heating process necessitating the application of a correction procedure. The correction allowed results from three lavas to pass strict selection criteria but we deem that only one of these exhibits sufficient internal consistency to be considered moderately reliable. It yields a virtual dipole moment of 47±6 ZAm2which is 60% of the present-day value. We combine this determination with a filtered dataset from the updated IAGA (International Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy) palaeointensity database, PINT08. Directional secular variation has recently been shown to have changed fundamentally since the Archaean, probably as a consequence of inner core growth since that time. However, here we argue that it is still unclear whether this evolution was accompanied by a single long timescale change in average poloidal field intensity. While the distribution of Precambrian palaeointensity determinations as a whole is significantly lower than that for the last 300 Myr, we show that this finding largely reflects data from the Proterozoic aeon. The distribution of more ancient measurements from the late Archaean-earliest Proterozoic is indistinguishable from that of the last 300 Myr which might suggest that a ‘Proterozoic dipole low’ period existed between two periods of higher field intensity. Were this pattern of long-term geomagnetic intensity variation to be supported by the addition of new data in the future, then it could indicate a related three-stage evolution in core dynamics, namely: vigorous thermal convection caused by high core-mantle heat flux early in the Earth’s history, weaker thermal convection later as the heat flux fell, and finally, strong compositional convection since the inner core nucleated.