Skip to main content


Long-term prediction of solar and geomagnetic activity daily time series using singular spectrum analysis and fuzzy descriptor models

Article metrics

  • 346 Accesses

  • 3 Citations


Of the various conditions that affect space weather, Sun-driven phenomena are the most dominant. Cyclic solar activity has a significant effect on the Earth, its climate, satellites, and space missions. In recent years, space weather hazards have become a major area of investigation, especially due to the advent of satellite technology. As such, the design of reliable alerting and warning systems is of utmost importance, and international collaboration is needed to develop accurate short-term and long-term prediction methodologies. Several methods have been proposed and implemented for the prediction of solar and geomagnetic activity indices, but problems in predicting the exact time and magnitude of such catastrophic events still remain. There are, however, descriptor systems that describe a wider class of systems, including physical models and non-dynamic constraints. It is well known that the descriptor system is much tighter than the state-space expression for representing real independent parametric perturbations. In addition, the fuzzy descriptor models as a generalization of the locally linear neurofuzzy models are general forms that can be trained by constructive intuitive learning algorithms. Here, we propose a combined model based on fuzzy descriptor models and singular spectrum analysis (SSA) (FD/SSA) to forecast a number of geomagnetic activity indices in a manner that optimizes a fuzzy descriptor model for each of the principal components obtained from singular spectrum analysis and recombines the predicted values so as to transform the geomagnetic activity time series into natural chaotic phenomena. The method has been applied to predict two solar and geomagnetic activity indices: geomagnetic aa and solar wind speed (SWS) of the solar wind index. The results demonstrate the higher power of the proposed method—compared to other methods—for predicting solar activity.


  1. Bellman, R., Adaptive Control Processes: A Guided Tour, Princeton University Press, 1961.

  2. Bothmer, V. and I. Daglis, Space Weather Physics and Effects, Springer Praxis Publishing, Chichester, UK, 2007.

  3. Brown, G. M., The peak of solar cycle 22: predictions in retrospect, Ann. Geophys., 10, 453–470, 1992.

  4. Brown, M. and C. Harris, Neurofuzzy Adaptive Modeling and Control, Prentice Hall, UK, 1995.

  5. Campbell, S. L., Singular Systems of Differential Equation, Pitman, London, 1980.

  6. Dai, L., Singular Control Systems, Springer, New York, 1989.

  7. Dziurla, B. and R. W. Newcomb, The Drazien inverse and semi-state equations, in Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on Math. Theory of Networks and Systems. Delft, Netherland, pp. 283–289, 1979.

  8. Gholipour, A., A. Abbaspour, B. N. Araabi, and C. Lucas, Enhancements in the prediction of solar activity by locally linear model tree, paper presented at 22nd IASTED Int. Con. on Modeling, Identification, and Control, Innsbruck, Austria, 2003.

  9. Gholipour, A., C. Lucas, B. N. Araabi, and M. Shafiee, Solar activity forecast: spectral analysis and neurofuzzy prediction, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 67, 595–603, 2005.

  10. Gholipour, A., C. Lucas, B. N. Araabi, M. Mirmomeni, and M. Shafiee, Extracting the main patterns of natural time series for long-term neuro-fuzzy prediction, J. Neural Comput. Appl., 16(4–5), 383–393, 2007.

  11. Halfmann, C., O. Nelles, and H. Holzmann, Modeling and identification of the vehicle suspension characteristics using local linear model trees, in Proc. of IEEE, Int. Conf. on Control Applications, Khala-Coast island, Hawaii, USA, pp. 1484–1489, 1999.

  12. Haykin, S. (editor), Unsupervised Neural networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, Macmillan, New York, 1994.

  13. Joselyn, J. A. et al., Panel achieves consensus prediction of solar cycle, Eos Trans. AGU, 78, 211–212, 1997.

  14. Kang, J. L. and W. S. Tang, Minimum energy control of 2-D singular systems with constrained control, in Proc. of the 4th Int. Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, August 18–21, Guangzhou, 2005.

  15. Karystinos, G. N. and A. Pados, On overfitting, generalization, and randomly expanded training sets, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 11(5), 1050–1057, 2000.

  16. Klir, G. J. and T. A. Folger, Fuzzy sets, uncertainty and information, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988.

  17. Leung, H., T. Lo, and S. Wang, Prediction of noisy chaotic time series using an optimal radial basis function neural network, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 12(5), 1163–1172, 2001.

  18. Lewis, Z. V., On the apparent randomness of substorm onsets, Geophys. Res. Lett., 18, 1627, 1991.

  19. Lillekjendlie, B., D. Kugimutzis, and N. Christophersen, Chaotic time series, part II: System identification and prediction, Identification Control, 15, 225–243, 1994.

  20. Ljung, L., System Identification: Theory for the User, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 1987.

  21. Lu, G. and D. W. C. Ho, Generalized quadratic stabilization for perturbated discrete-time singular systems with delayed state, in 4th Int. Conf. on Control and Automation (ICCA’03), June 10–12, Montreal, Canada, 2003.

  22. Lucas, C., A. Abbaspour, A. Gholipour, B. N. Araabi, and M. Fatourechi, Enhancing the performance of neurofuzzy predictors by emotional learning algorithm, Informatica, 27(2), 165–174, 2003.

  23. Luenberger, D. G., Dynamic equation in descriptor form, IEEE Trans. Auto. Contr., AC-22, 132–321, 1977.

  24. Meng, B. and J. F. Zhang, Reachability conditions for switched linear singular systems, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 51(3), 482–488, 2006.

  25. Mirmomeni, M. and C. Lucas, Analyzing the variation of embedding dimension of solar and geomagnetic activity indices during geomagnetic storm time, Earth Planets Space, 61, 237–247, 2009.

  26. Mirmomeni, M. and M. Shafiee, State analysis of discrete-time singular nonlinear systems using a fuzzy neural network, in 13th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE’05), Zanjan University, Zanjan, Iran, 2005a.

  27. Mirmomeni, M. and M. Shafiee, State analysis of time-invariant singular systems via Haar wavelet, in 13th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE’05), Zanjan University, Zanjan, Iran, 2005b.

  28. Mirmomeni, M., M. Shafiee, C. Lucas, and B. N. Araabi, Introducing a new learning method for fuzzy descriptor systems with the aid of spectral analysis to forecast solar activity, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 68, 2061–2074, 2006.

  29. Mirmomeni, M., C. Lucas, and B. Moshiri, Long term prediction of chaotic time series with the aid of neuro fuzzy models, spectral analysis and correlation analysis, IEEE Int. Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2007.

  30. Nelles, O., Nonlinear System Identification, Springer, Berlin, 2001.

  31. Newcomb, R. W., The semi-state description of nonlinear time-variable circuits, IEEE Trans. Circuits Systems, 28, 62–71, 1981.

  32. Pandolfi, L., On the Regulator Problem for Linear Degenerate Control Systems, J. Optimiz. Theory Applic., 33, 141–154, 1981.

  33. Raouf, J. and E. K. Boukas, Observer-based controller design for linear singular systems with markovian switching, in 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Atlantis, Paradise Island, Bahamas, 2004.

  34. Saunders, P. T., An Introduction to Catastrophe Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980.

  35. Schatten, K. H. and W. D. Pesnell, An early solar dynamo prediction: cycle 23-cycle 22, Geophy. Res. Lett., 20, 2257–2278, 1993.

  36. Schatten, K. H. and S. Sofia, Forecast of an exceptionally large even numbered solar cycle, Geophy. Res. Lett., 14, 632, 1987.

  37. Schatten, K. H., P. H. Scherrer, L. Svalgaard, and J. M. Wilcox, Using Dynamo theory to predict the sunspot number during solar cycle 21, Geophy. Res. Lett., 5, 411, 1978.

  38. Schatten, K. H., D. J. Myers, and S. Sofia, Solar activity forecast for solar cycle 23, Geophy. Res. Lett., 23(6), 605–608, 1996.

  39. Shafiee, M. and S. Amani, Optimal control for a class of singular systems using neural network, Iranian J. Sci. Technol. Trans. B, Eng., 29(B1), Shiraz, Iran, 2005.

  40. Sitnov, M. I., A. S. Sharma, and K. Papadopoulos, Modeling sub-storm dynamics of the magnetosphere: From self-organization and self-organized criticality to non- equilibrium phase transitions, Phys. Rev. E, 65, 106–116, 2001.

  41. Sofia, S., P. Fox, and K. H. Schatten, Forecast update for activity cycle 23 from a Dynamo-based method, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25(22), 4149–4152, 1998.

  42. Taniguchi, T., K. Tanaka, K. Yamafuji, and H. O. Wang, Fuzzy descriptor systems: Stability analysis and design via LMIs, in Proc. American Control Conference, pp. 1827–1831, 1999a.

  43. Taniguchi, T., K. Tanaka, and H. O. Wang, Fuzzy descriptor systems and fuzzy controller designs, in Proc. of the 8th International Fuzzy System Association World Congress, pp. 655–659, 1999b.

  44. Taniguchi, T., K. Tanaka, and H. O. Wang, Fuzzy descriptor systems and nonlinear model following control, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 8(4), 442–452, 2000.

  45. Tascione, T. F, H. W. Kroehl, R. Creiger, J. W Freeman Jr., R. A. Wolf, R. W. Spiro, R. V. Hilmer, J. W. Shade, and B. A. Hausman, New ionospheric and mangnetospheric specification models, Radio Sci., 23, 211–222, 1988.

  46. Thompson, R., A technique for predicting the amplitude of solar cycle, Sol. Phys., 148, 383, 1993.

  47. Tong, H., Nonlinear time series: A dynamical system approach, Oxford University Press, 1996.

  48. Tong, H. and K. Lim, Threshold autoregressive limit cycles and cyclical data, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 42, 245–292, 1980.

  49. Uluyol, O., M. Ragheb, and S. R. Ray, Local output gamma feedback neural network, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Neural Networks: IJCNN, 1, 337–342, 1998.

  50. Vassiliadis, D., A. J. Klimas, J. A. Valdivia, and D. N. Baker, The nonlinear dynamics of space weather, Space Weather: Phys. Applic, 26, 197–207, 2000.

  51. Vautard, R. and M. Ghil, Singular spectrum analysis in nonlinear dynamics with applications to paleoclimatic time series, Physica D, 35, 395–424, 1989.

  52. Vautard, R., P. Yiou, and M. Ghil, Singular spectrum analysis: a toolkit for short noisy chaotic signals, Physica D, 58, 95–126, 1992.

  53. Verghese, G. C, B. C. Levy, and T. Kailath, A generalized state-space for singular systems, IEEE Trans. Auto. Contr., AC-26(4), 1981.

  54. Wang, J., Q. Zhang, W Liu, X. Xin, and V. Sreeram, H model reduction for singular systems, in Proc. of 2004 American Control Conference, June 30-July 2, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 119–124, 2004.

  55. Weigend, A., B. H. Berman, and D. Rumelhart, Predicting sunspots and exchange rates with connectionist networks, Nonlinear Model. Forecasting J., Addison-Wesley, 395–432, 1992.

  56. Xiaoping, L., Solvability of nonlinear singular systems-part II: the case with inputs, in Proc. of the American Control Conference, Seattle, Washington, 1995.

  57. Yonchev, A., R. Findeisen, C. Ebenbauer, and F. Allgöower, Model predictive control of linear continuous time singular systems subject to input constraints, in 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, December 14–17, Atlantis, Paradise Island, Bahamas, 2004.

  58. Zeeman, E. C, Catastrophe Theory: Selected Papers: 1972–1977, Addison-Wesely Publishing Co., Reading, 1987.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Masoud Mirmomeni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Key words

  • Space weather
  • geomagnetic disturbance
  • solar activity indices
  • prediction
  • fuzzy descriptor models
  • singular systems
  • singular spectrum analysis
  • GLoLiMoT