Skip to main content

Advertisement

We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.

Fuzzy mathematical model for the analysis of geomagnetic field data

Abstract

The Indian network of magnetometers provides an opportunity to examine the pattern of geomagnetic field variations during magnetic storms. In this study, fuzzy transitive closure analysis, which is a powerful technique for pattern recognition, has been employed. The pattern of variation differs at the nonequatorial, equatorial and the observatory situated nearer to the geomagnetic Sq focus. The results of the analysis are compared with those of classical cluster analysis. The comparison confirms the validity of applying this model for the analysis of geomagnetic storms. The superiority of fuzzy concepts over the conventional method and the analytical techniques are presented here.

References

  1. Alex, S. and D. R. K. Rao, Magnetospheric contribution to low latitude Sq variations, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 47, 599–606, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderberg, M. R., Cluster Analysis for Applications, Academic Press, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bezdek, J. C., G. Biswas, and L.Y. Huang, Transitive closures of fuzzy thesauri for information and retrieval systems, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 25, 343–356, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell, W. H., Introduction to Geomagnetic Fields, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chandra, H., G. D. Vyas, B. M. Pathan, and D. R. K. Rao, Spectral characteristics of magnetic storm-induced F-region scintillations extending into daytime, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 57, 1273–1283, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dekkers, M. J., C. G. Langereis, S. P. Vriend, P. J. M. van Santvoort, and G. J. de Lange, Fuzzy c-means cluster analysis of early diagenetic effects on natural remanent magnetization acquisition in a 1.1 Myr piston core from the Central Mediterranean, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 85, 155–171, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Friedman, M. and A. Kandel, Introduction to Pattern Recognition-Statistical, Structural, Neural and Fuzzy Logic Approaches, Imperial College Press, London, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jain, A. R., Geomagnetic storm effects on ionospheric total electron content in Indian zone, Indian J. Radio Space Phys., 7, 111–118, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jain, A. R. and N. S. Sastri, The H amplitude of Sudden Commencements of Magnetic Storms at Sabhawala (Dehra Dun), J. Geophys., 45, 101–106, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson, R. A. and D. W. Wichern, Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall, NJ, USA, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klir, G. J. and T. A. Folger, Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty and Information, Prentice hall of India Private Ltd., New Delhi, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klir, G. J. and B. Yuvan, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic, Theory and Applications, Prentice Hall of India Private Ltd., New Delhi, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kruiver, P. P., Y. S. Kok, M. J. Dekkers, C. G. Langereis, and C. Laj, A pseudo-Thellier relative palaeo intensity record, and rock magnetic and geochemical parameters in relation to climate during the last 276 kys in the Azores region, Geophys. J. Int., 136(3), 757–770, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Parkinson, W. D., Introduction to Geomagnetism, Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh and London, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rastogi, R. G. and A. R. Patil, On certain aspects of daily variation of geomagnetic field at low latitudes, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 44, 495–503, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rastogi, R. G., N. D. Kaushika, and N. B. Trivedi, Some relations between the sudden commencements at the equatorial electrojet, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 26, 771–776, 1964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rastogi, R. G., D. R. K. Rao, S. Alex, B. M. Pathan, and T. S. Sastry, An intense SFE and SSC event in geomagnetic H, Y and Z fields at the Indian chain of observatories, Ann. Geophys., 15, 1301–1308, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sridharan, M. and A. M. S. Ramasamy, Multidimensional scaling technique for analysis magnetic storms at Indian observatories, Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 111, 459–465, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sridharan, M. and N. Gururajan, Fractal behavior of geomagnetic storm on 29–31 October 2003, Int. J. Mat. Sci., 54, 303–311, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Srivastava, B. J., H. Abbas, D. R. K. Rao, and B. M. Pathan, Extended main phase of some sudden commencement great geomagnetic storms with double SSCs, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 61, 993–1000, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sugiura, M., The solar diurnal variation in the amplitude of sudden commencements of magnetic storms at the geomagnetic equator, J. Geophys. Res., 58, 558–559, 1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsurutani, B. T., W. D. Gonzalez, G. S. Lakhina, and S. Alex, The extreme magnetic storm of 1–2 September 1859, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 2002.

  23. Valdivia, J. A., A. S. Sharma, and K. Papadopoulos, Prediction of magnetic storms by nonlinear methods, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23(21), 2899–2902, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Valdivia, J. A., D. Vassiliadis, and A. Klimas, Spatiotemporal activity of magnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 12239–12250, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vassiliadis, D., A. J. Klimas, J. A. Valdivia, and D. N. Baker, The Dst geomagnetic response as a function of storm phase and amplitude and the solar wind electric field, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 24957–24976, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zadeh, L. A., Fuzzy sets, Inform. Control, 8, 338–353, 1965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Sridharan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sridharan, M. Fuzzy mathematical model for the analysis of geomagnetic field data. Earth Planet Sp 61, 1169–1177 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352968

Download citation

Key words

  • Fuzzy logic
  • transitive closure
  • geomagnetic storm
  • geomagnetic Sq
  • EEJ current