- Open Access
Earthquake hazard assessment in seismogenic systems through Markovian artificial neural network estimation: an application to the Japan area
Earth, Planets and Space volume 61, pages 1223–1232 (2009)
An earlier work (Herrera et al.: Earth Planets Space, 58, 973–979, 2006) introduced two new methods for seismic hazard evaluation in a geographic area with distinct, but related, seismogenic regions. These two methods are based on modeling the transition probabilities of states, i.e. patterns of presence or absence of large earthquakes, in the regions, as a Markov chain. This modeling is, in turn, based on a straightforward counting of observed transitions between states. The direct method obtains transition probabilities among states that include events with magnitudes M ≥ M r , where M r is a specified threshold magnitude. The mixed method evaluates probabilities for transitions from a state with M ≥ M m r to a state with M ≥ M M r , where M m r < M M r . Both methods gave very good results when applied to the Japan area, with the mixed method giving the best results and an improved magnitude range. In the work presented here, we propose other methods that use the learning capacity of an elementary neuronal network (perceptron) to characterize the Markovian behavior of the system; these neuronal methods, direct and mixed, gave results ∼7 and ∼6% better than the counting methods, respectively. Method performance is measured using grading functions that evaluate a tradeoff between positive and negative aspects of performance. This procedure results in a normalized grade being assigned that allows comparisons among different models and methods.
Bishop, C. M., Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, 488 pp., Calen-don Press Oxford, UK, 1995.
Brillinger, D., Seismic risk assessment: some statistical aspects, Earthq. Predict. Res., 1, 183–195, 1982.
Chao, L. C. and M. J. Skibniewski, Estimating construction productivity: Neural network-based approach, J. Comput. Civil Eng., 8(2), 234–251, 1994.
Dowla, F. U., S. R. Taylor, and R. W. Anderson, Seismic discrimination with artificial neural networks: preliminary results with regional spectral data, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 80, 1346–1373, 1990.
Fedotov, S., Regularities of the distribution of strong earthquakes in Kamchatka, the Kurile Islands, and northeast Japan, Trudy Isnt. Fiz. Zemli. Acad. Nauk. SSSR, 36, 66–94, 1965.
García-Fernández, M. and J. J. Egozcue, Seismic hazard assessment in TERESA test areas based on a Bayesian technique, Nat. Haz., 2(3–4), 249–265, 1989.
Goldman, S., Information Theory, 385 pp., Dover Publs. Inc., USA, 1953.
Gutenberg, B. and C. Richter, Frequency of earthquakes in California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 34, 185–188, 1944.
Herrera, C., F A. Nava, and C. Lomnitz, Time-dependent earthquake hazard evaluation in seismogenic systems using mixed Markov Chains: An application to the Japan area, Earth Planets Space, 58, 973–979, 2006.
Hirata, N., Past, current and future of Japanese national program for earthquake prediction research, Earth Planets Space, 56, xliii–l, 2004.
Ito, T., S. Yoshioka, and S. Miyazaki, Interplate coupling in southwest Japan deduced from inversion analysis of GPS data, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 115, 17–34, 1999.
Ito, T., S. Yoshioka, and S. Miyazaki, Interplate coupling in northeast Japan deduced from inversion analysis of GPS data, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 176, 117–130, 2000.
Kagan, Y and D. Jackson, Seismic gap hypothesis: Ten years after, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 21419–21431, 1991.
Kanamori, H., The energy in grat earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 2981–2987, 1977.
Karunanithi, N., W. J. Grenney, D. Whitley, and K. Bovee, Neural networks for river flow prediction, J. Comput. Civil Eng., 8, 201–220, 1994.
Kashyap, R. L., Speaker recognition from an unknown utterance and speaker-speech interaction, IEEE Trans on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 24, 481–488, 1976.
Katsumata, K. and M. Kasahara, Precursory seismic quiescence before the 1994 Kurile Earthquake (Mw = 8.3) revealed by three independent seismic catalogs, Pure Appl. Geophys., 155, 443–470, 1999.
Lomnitz, C. and F. Nava, The predictive power of seismic gaps, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 73, 1815–1824, 1983.
McCann, W. R., S. P. Nishenko, S. P. Sykes, and J. Krause, Seismic gap and plate tectonics: seismic potential for major boundaries, Pure Appl. Geophys., 117, 1082–1147, 1979.
Mcllraith, A. L. and H. C. Card, Birdsong recognition using backpropa-gation and multivariate statistics, IEEE Trans on Signal Processing, 45, 2740–2748, 1997.
Mogi, K., Migration of seismic activity, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., 46, 53–74, 1968.
Mogi, K., Earthquake Prediction, 355 pp., Academic Press, Japan Inc., 1985.
Nava, F. A., C. Herrera, J. Frez, and E. Glowacka, Seismic hazard evaluation using Markov chains; Application to the Japan area, Pure Appl. Geophys., 162, 1347–1366, 2005.
Patwardahan, A. S., R. B. Kulkarni, and D. Tocher, A semi Markov model for characterizing recurrence of great earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 70, 323–347, 1980.
Reid, H. F., The mechanism of the Earthquake, The California Earthquake of April 18, 1906, in Report of the State Earthquake Investigation Commission, edited by Carnegie Institution, 2, 16–18, Washington D.C., 1910.
Richter, C., Elementary Seismology, 521 pp., W H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1958.
Rosenblatt, F., The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain, Psychological Rev., 65, 386–408, 1958 (Reprinted in Anderson & Rosenfeld, 92–114, 1988).
Rosenblatt, F., Principles of Neurodynamics, 215 pp., Spartan, New York, 1962.
Rüttener, E., J. J. Egozcue, D. Mayer-Rosa, and S. Mueller, Bayesian estimation of seismic hazard for two sites in Switzerland, Nat. Haz., 14, 165–178, 1996.
Shimazaki, K., Intra-plate seismicity and inter-plate earthquakes: historical activity in southwest Japan, Tectonophysics, 33, 33–42, 1976.
Shimazaki, K. and T. Nakata, Time predictable recurrence model for large earthquakes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 7, 279–282, 1980.
Thatcher, W. and J. B. Rundle, A viscoleastic coupling model for the cyclic deformation due to periodically repeated earthquakes at subduction zones, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 7631–7640, 1984.
Utsu, T., Estimation of parameters for recurrence models of earthquakes, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., Univ. Tokyo, 59, 53–56, 1984.
Wyss, M., K. Shimazaki, and T. Urabe, Quantitative mapping of a precursory seismic quiescence to the Izu-Oshima 1990 (M6.5) earthquake, Japan, Geophys. J. Int., 127, 735–743, 2007.
Zhao, Y. and K. Takano, An artificial neural network approach for broadband seismic phase picking, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 89, 670–680, 1999.
About this article
Cite this article
Herrera, C., Nava, F.A. Earthquake hazard assessment in seismogenic systems through Markovian artificial neural network estimation: an application to the Japan area. Earth Planet Sp 61, 1223–1232 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352975
- Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment
- neural networks
- Markov chains