Skip to main content

Earthquake hazard assessment in seismogenic systems through Markovian artificial neural network estimation: an application to the Japan area

abstract

An earlier work (Herrera et al.: Earth Planets Space, 58, 973–979, 2006) introduced two new methods for seismic hazard evaluation in a geographic area with distinct, but related, seismogenic regions. These two methods are based on modeling the transition probabilities of states, i.e. patterns of presence or absence of large earthquakes, in the regions, as a Markov chain. This modeling is, in turn, based on a straightforward counting of observed transitions between states. The direct method obtains transition probabilities among states that include events with magnitudes MM r , where M r is a specified threshold magnitude. The mixed method evaluates probabilities for transitions from a state with MM m r to a state with MM M r , where M m r < M M r . Both methods gave very good results when applied to the Japan area, with the mixed method giving the best results and an improved magnitude range. In the work presented here, we propose other methods that use the learning capacity of an elementary neuronal network (perceptron) to characterize the Markovian behavior of the system; these neuronal methods, direct and mixed, gave results 7 and 6% better than the counting methods, respectively. Method performance is measured using grading functions that evaluate a tradeoff between positive and negative aspects of performance. This procedure results in a normalized grade being assigned that allows comparisons among different models and methods.

References

  • Bishop, C. M., Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, 488 pp., Calen-don Press Oxford, UK, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brillinger, D., Seismic risk assessment: some statistical aspects, Earthq. Predict. Res., 1, 183–195, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, L. C. and M. J. Skibniewski, Estimating construction productivity: Neural network-based approach, J. Comput. Civil Eng., 8(2), 234–251, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowla, F. U., S. R. Taylor, and R. W. Anderson, Seismic discrimination with artificial neural networks: preliminary results with regional spectral data, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 80, 1346–1373, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedotov, S., Regularities of the distribution of strong earthquakes in Kamchatka, the Kurile Islands, and northeast Japan, Trudy Isnt. Fiz. Zemli. Acad. Nauk. SSSR, 36, 66–94, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Fernández, M. and J. J. Egozcue, Seismic hazard assessment in TERESA test areas based on a Bayesian technique, Nat. Haz., 2(3–4), 249–265, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, S., Information Theory, 385 pp., Dover Publs. Inc., USA, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg, B. and C. Richter, Frequency of earthquakes in California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 34, 185–188, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, C., F A. Nava, and C. Lomnitz, Time-dependent earthquake hazard evaluation in seismogenic systems using mixed Markov Chains: An application to the Japan area, Earth Planets Space, 58, 973–979, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirata, N., Past, current and future of Japanese national program for earthquake prediction research, Earth Planets Space, 56, xliii–l, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, T., S. Yoshioka, and S. Miyazaki, Interplate coupling in southwest Japan deduced from inversion analysis of GPS data, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 115, 17–34, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, T., S. Yoshioka, and S. Miyazaki, Interplate coupling in northeast Japan deduced from inversion analysis of GPS data, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 176, 117–130, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, Y and D. Jackson, Seismic gap hypothesis: Ten years after, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 21419–21431, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori, H., The energy in grat earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 2981–2987, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karunanithi, N., W. J. Grenney, D. Whitley, and K. Bovee, Neural networks for river flow prediction, J. Comput. Civil Eng., 8, 201–220, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashyap, R. L., Speaker recognition from an unknown utterance and speaker-speech interaction, IEEE Trans on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 24, 481–488, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsumata, K. and M. Kasahara, Precursory seismic quiescence before the 1994 Kurile Earthquake (Mw = 8.3) revealed by three independent seismic catalogs, Pure Appl. Geophys., 155, 443–470, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomnitz, C. and F. Nava, The predictive power of seismic gaps, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 73, 1815–1824, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, W. R., S. P. Nishenko, S. P. Sykes, and J. Krause, Seismic gap and plate tectonics: seismic potential for major boundaries, Pure Appl. Geophys., 117, 1082–1147, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcllraith, A. L. and H. C. Card, Birdsong recognition using backpropa-gation and multivariate statistics, IEEE Trans on Signal Processing, 45, 2740–2748, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogi, K., Migration of seismic activity, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., 46, 53–74, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogi, K., Earthquake Prediction, 355 pp., Academic Press, Japan Inc., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nava, F. A., C. Herrera, J. Frez, and E. Glowacka, Seismic hazard evaluation using Markov chains; Application to the Japan area, Pure Appl. Geophys., 162, 1347–1366, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patwardahan, A. S., R. B. Kulkarni, and D. Tocher, A semi Markov model for characterizing recurrence of great earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 70, 323–347, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, H. F., The mechanism of the Earthquake, The California Earthquake of April 18, 1906, in Report of the State Earthquake Investigation Commission, edited by Carnegie Institution, 2, 16–18, Washington D.C., 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, C., Elementary Seismology, 521 pp., W H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, F., The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain, Psychological Rev., 65, 386–408, 1958 (Reprinted in Anderson & Rosenfeld, 92–114, 1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, F., Principles of Neurodynamics, 215 pp., Spartan, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttener, E., J. J. Egozcue, D. Mayer-Rosa, and S. Mueller, Bayesian estimation of seismic hazard for two sites in Switzerland, Nat. Haz., 14, 165–178, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimazaki, K., Intra-plate seismicity and inter-plate earthquakes: historical activity in southwest Japan, Tectonophysics, 33, 33–42, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimazaki, K. and T. Nakata, Time predictable recurrence model for large earthquakes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 7, 279–282, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, W. and J. B. Rundle, A viscoleastic coupling model for the cyclic deformation due to periodically repeated earthquakes at subduction zones, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 7631–7640, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utsu, T., Estimation of parameters for recurrence models of earthquakes, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., Univ. Tokyo, 59, 53–56, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyss, M., K. Shimazaki, and T. Urabe, Quantitative mapping of a precursory seismic quiescence to the Izu-Oshima 1990 (M6.5) earthquake, Japan, Geophys. J. Int., 127, 735–743, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y. and K. Takano, An artificial neural network approach for broadband seismic phase picking, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 89, 670–680, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Herrera.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herrera, C., Nava, F.A. Earthquake hazard assessment in seismogenic systems through Markovian artificial neural network estimation: an application to the Japan area. Earth Planet Sp 61, 1223–1232 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352975

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352975

Key words

  • Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment
  • neural networks
  • Markov chains