- Open Access
A simple method for deriving the uniform field MT responses in auroral zones
Earth, Planets and Space volume 54, pages443–450(2002)
Source field effects in magnetotelluric data acquired at high geomagnetic latitudes can result in erroneous interpretations of Earth conductivity structure deep within the mantle. This paper describes a simple technique most appropriate for a region that is dominantly one-dimensional (1-D) and uses the vertical magnetic field variations for identifying intervals of likely low contamination by non-uniform sources. Times are chosen when the variations stay within prescribed limits defined on the basis of a histogram of the variations for the whole recording interval. An example is given showing application of the method for data from a site under the auroral oval at a time when solar activity was at its lowest for the last solar cycle. A model derived from the responses obtained by processing all available data implies a decrease in resistivity at about 350 km to about 100 Ω.m. In contrast, the model obtained from low activity interval responses shows a less rapid decrease in resistivity, without a change at around the 410 km phase boundary. The responses obtained from all data can be explained by the influence of a source with an average wavelength of 3,000 km.
Akasofu, S.-L., Polar and Magnetospheric Substorms, 280 pp., Springer, New York, 1968.
Cagniard, L., Basic theory of the magneto-telluric method of geophysical prospecting, Geophysics, 18, 605–635, 1953.
Camfield, P. A., Magnetometer array study in a tectonically active region of Quebec, Canada, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 65, 553–570, 1981.
Constable, S. C., R. L. Parker, and C. G. Constable, Occam’s inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data, Geophysics, 52, 289–300, 1987.
Dmitriev, V. I. and M. N. Berdichevsky, The fundamental model of magnetotelluric sounding, Proc. IEEE, 67, 1034–1044, 1979.
Egbert, G. D., Robust multiple-station magnetotelluric data processing, Geophys. J. Int., 130, 475–496, 1997.
Egbert, G. D., M. Eisel, O. S. Boyd, and H. F. Morrison, DC trains and Pc3s: Source effects in mid-latitude geomagnetic transfer functions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 25–28, 2000.
Gamble, T. D., W. M. Goubau, and J. Clarke, Magnetotellurics with a remote reference, Geophysics, 44, 53–68, 1979.
Garcia, X., A. D. Chave, and A. G. Jones, Robust processing of magnetotelluric data from the auroral zone, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 49, 1451–1468, 1997.
Hermance, J. F., Electromagnetic induction in the Earth by a moving ionospheric current system, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 55, 557–576, 1978.
Hermance, J. F. and W. R. Peltier, Magnetotelluric fields of a line current, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 3351–3356, 1970.
Hibbs, R. D. and F. W. Jones, The calculation of the electromagnetic fields of a sheet current with arbitrary intensity distribution over a layered half space—I: The general method and results, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 46, 433–452, 1976a.
Hibbs, R. D. and F. W. Jones, The calculation of the electromagnetic fields of a sheet current with arbitrary intensity distribution over a layered half space—II: The computer program and its application, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 46, 453–465, 1976b.
Jones, A. G., Geomagnetic induction studies in Scandinavia—I. Determination of the inductive response function from the magnetometer data, J. Geophys., 48, 181–194, 1980.
Jones, A. G. and I. J. Ferguson, The electric Moho, Nature, 409, 331–333, 2001.
Jones, A. G. and H. Jödicke, Magnetotelluric transfer function estimation improvement by a coherence-based rejection technique, 54th Society of Exploration Geophysics Annual General Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A., December 2–6, Abstract volume pages 51–55, 1984.
Jones, A. G., A. D. Chave, G. Egbert, D. Auld, and K. Bahr, A comparison of techniques for magnetotelluric response function estimation, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 14,201–14,213, 1989.
Kuckes, A. F., Relations between electrical conductivity of a mantle and fluctuating magnetic fields, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 32, 119–131, 1973a.
Kuckes, A. F., Correspondence between the magnetotelluric and field penetration depth analysis for measuring electrical conductivity, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 32, 381–385, 1973b.
Liu, H.-P. and D. D. Kosloff, Numerical evaluation of the Hilbert transform by the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) technique, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 67, 791–799, 1981.
Mareschal, M., Source effects and the interpretation of geomagnetic sounding data at sub-auroral latitudes, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 67, 125–136, 1981.
Mareschal, M., Modelling of natural sources of magnetospheric origin in the interpretation of regional induction studies: a review, Surv. Geophys., 8, 261–300, 1986.
Narod, B. B. and J. R. Bennest, Ring-core fluxgate magnetometers for use as observatory variometers, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 59, 23–28, 1990.
Osipova, I. L., S. C. O. Hjelt, and L. L. Vanyan, Source field problems in northern parts of the Baltic shield, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 53, 337–342, 1989.
Parker, R. L., The inverse problem of electromagnetic induction: existence and construction of solutions based on incomplete data, J. Geophys. Res., 85, 4421–4425, 1980.
Parker, R. L. and K. A. Whaler, Numerical methods for establishing solutions to the inverse problem of electromagnetic induction, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 9574–9584, 1981.
Peltier, W. R. and J. F. Hermance, Magnetotelluric fields of a Gaussian electrojet, Can. J. Earth Sci., 8, 338–346, 1971.
Pettersen, F., Aurora borealis—the northern lights, Way North: Earth Science, publication from Tromsø Museum, Univ. Tromsø, 1, 1992.
Pirjola, R. J., Modelling the electric and magnetic fields at the Earth’s surface due to an auroral electrojet, J. Atmos. Solar-Terrestr. Phys., 60, 1139–1148, 1998.
Price, A. T., The theory of magnetotelluric fields when the source field is considered, J. Geophys. Res., 67, 1907–1918, 1962.
Schmucker, U., Anomalies of geomagnetic variations in the southwestern United States, Bull. Scripps Inst. Oceanogr., Univ. Calif. Press, 13, 1970.
Schmucker, U. and P. Weidelt, Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth, Lecture Notes, Aarhus Univ., Denmark, 1975.
Srivastava, S. P., Method of interpretation of magneto-telluric data when source field is considered, J. Geophys. Res., 70, 945–954, 1965.
Tikhonov, A. N., On determining electric characteristics of the deep layers of the Earth’s crust, Dolk. Acad. Nauk. SSSR, 73, 295–297, 1950. Reprinted in Vozoff (1986), 2–3.
Viljanen, A., R. Pirjola, and L. Häkkinen, An attempt to reduce induction source effects at high latitudes, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 45, 817–831, 1993.
Viljanen, A., R. Pirjola, and O. Amm, Magnetotelluric source effect due to 3D ionospheric current systems using the complex image method for 1D conductivity structures, Earth Planets Space, 51, 933–945, 1999.
Vozoff, K. (ed.), Magnetotelluric Methods, Soc. Expl. Geophys. Reprint Ser. No. 5, Tulsa, OK, ISBN 0-931830-36-2, 1986.
Wait, J. R., On the relationship between telluric currents and the Earth’s magnetic field, Geophysics, 19, 281–289, 1954.
Weidelt, P., The inverse problem of geomagnetic induction, Z. Geophys., 38, 257–289, 1972.
Weidelt, P., Entwicklung und Erdprobung eines Verfahrens zur Inversion zweidimensionaler Leitfähigkeitsstrukturen in E-Polarisation, Habilitation thesis, Dept. Math. Natural Sciences, Univ. Göttingen, 1978.
Xu, Y., B. T. Poe, T. J. Shankland, and D. C. Rubie, Electrical conductivity of olivine, wadsleyite and ringwoodite under upper-mantle conditions, Science, 280, 1415–1418, 1998.
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, A.G., Spratt, J. A simple method for deriving the uniform field MT responses in auroral zones. Earth Planet Sp 54, 443–450 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03353035
- Solar Cycle
- Apparent Resistivity
- Auroral Zone
- Auroral Oval
- Instantaneous Amplitude